It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If the b phase came into contact with the c phase therefore both being supplied by the c phase on the load side of whatever how would you have 277 between the 2?
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
originally posted by: dashen
B&C shorted in two places?
I'm going to award it to you, dashen! You are so incredibly close we're practically splitting hairs here.
If you would have said just "B & C are shorted" you would have the correct answer, but there's more to it than that.
You see if the B & C conductors actually "shorted" you'd have a phase to phase short (bad ju-ju).
What had happened was the B conductor came free of the lug in the distribution panel. Because cable that big is so stiff, the B conductor wanted to go back to a straight position. Because the feeders entered the lower left side of the panel they were all bent to the left to make up the lugs. When the B phase came loose it sprang to the right contacting the C lug in the panel. So, technically it wasn't a "short", but rather an open that then re-energized itself on the C leg, hence the 277 reading between B and C. It didn't have to touch in "two" place, but rather only one in this scenario.
We believe that the electrician who made up the connections didn't torque the lug properly. Then when it was under load and heated up the conductor came loose and ultimately came free. That electrician lost his job.
And now you know...the rest of the story.
originally posted by: xxspockyxx
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk
People don't use fuses?
Again if both wires are being supplied by the same phase how would you have voltage between the 2?
I'm calling bs. Your sorry doesn't check out.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: xxspockyxx
Okay, one more time for ... you....
If you meter the circuit on the load side you will see 277 phase to phase (based on the above).
If the failure would have happened the other way, on the line side, it would have been a phase to phase short. Agreed?
I really don't have a lot of compunction to argue this fact any more. You can call BS all you want. I was there!
what math? You test phase to phase on 2 wire connected to the same phase on the load side of anything you will have 0 volts. Story doesn't check out. You may be not telling the story right.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: xxspockyxx
Do the math!