It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has waived part of the fines levied against five megabanks whose affiliates were involved in manipulating the global interest rate and other fraudulent activities.
Among the institutions are Deutsche Bank, which holds about US$130 million of the president's debt.
The four other banks receiving the waivers — Citigroup, JPMorgan, Barclays and UBS — received a temporary waiver by the administration of former President Barack Obama in late 2016 for a period of one year. Now, the Trump administration has offered five-year waivers to Citigroup, JPMorgan and Barclays and three-year waivers to UBS and Deutsche respectively.
The waivers were quietly announced online over the federal register during the Christmas holiday week. Per the laws which protect retirement savings, financial firms with affiliates convicted of violating securities statutes are barred from the lucrative business of managing those savings. However, a special exemption from the U.S. Department of Labor allows these firms to keep their status as "qualified professional asset managers."
The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has waived part of the fines levied against five megabanks whose affiliates were involved in manipulating the global interest rate and other fraudulent activities.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Xcalibur254
Well. At least he's got major interests in it opposed to just being their whipping boy.
S+F
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Xcalibur254
This is extremely disheartening to hear...
The "Too Big To Fail" banks deserve harsher punishments and should be held accountable for their economic crimes... they ruin lives and communities with impunity, all while exploiting the masses. What a crock of s***!
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
I fully agree but who knows what they may be saying or threatening behind closed doors. They kind of hold us hostage until we find a way to circumvent the massive damage they can cause if they so choose. The hit to our economy they could levy would ruin a whole lot of peoples lives...if they even lived through it.
That said, you have to admit it's pretty bad optics for Trump to be waiving the punishment for a bank that has not only given his family close to $2 billion in the past but also has ties to Russia while he is under investigation for colluding with Russia.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Wide-Eyes
I don't know what more info you need. Here is the posting on the federal register. As far as I can tell that official document is the only reference the government has made in reference to exemptions. That lack of info and the fact that it was released over a holiday seems to speak volumes.
I find it amazing that Obama still gets # for going easy on the banks in the wake of the Great Recession even though that helped stabilize the economy. Trump on the other hand goes easy on the banks during a booming economy (according to him and his supporters) and all of a sudden we need more info, or maybe this is better for the economy, or a myriad of other excuses.
One would think that with such a good economy now would be the time to punish these banks since the economy can handle a little extra strain. Who knows what it will look like in 3 to 5 years time. And once again isn't it just a little coincidental that these fines won't be due until after the election? He knows that his base won't agree with this move. That's why there's been absolutely zero mention of it outside the federal register and why it was released when it was. And that's why he's kicked the can down the road to a point where he may not be President anymore and it may be left up to someone else to deal with.