It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: eisegesis
I guess this will have to be explained as well.
Three weeks ago, in a partisan effort to dismiss what is now an admitted forgery, the left-wing Washington Post’s Philip Bump (already a proven liar) consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”
www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.38258b602ab2
The problem is, Nelson has admitted to adding "notes," under Moore's signature. If the "writing seems consistent with one writer" and Nelson has admitted to what she added, this whole thing is one big inconsistent mess.
originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: Grambler
I think the first false premise is that she ever said the Roy Moore wrote it all to begin with.
I’d like to see your video of her ever saying that Roy Moore wrote every word of it.
I don’t remember her ever saying that at all.
Also, I watched the interview and I don’t remember her saying that she had deliberately lied or misled anyone. Maybe I missed that part.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
So you admit Moore wrote the part that matters?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
Oh my.
Well let's wait for breitbart or ABC to tell us the truth like they always do...
As soon as some "reporting" comes out that fits your beliefs make sure to start posting how much it's true. And not just another media psyop.
originally posted by: Jefferton
This is a perfect example of real news and fake news colliding.
And a scumbag will walk away from it.
Sad that *one* side has higher standards.
originally posted by: eisegesis
I guess this will have to be explained as well.
Three weeks ago, Washington Post’s Philip Bump consulted former FBI agent Mark Songer, a forensics documents examiner, to examine a yearbook produced by one of Roy Moore’s accusers as evidence he assaulted her. The expert concluded that the “writing seems consistent with one writer.”
www.washingtonpost.com... rm=.38258b602ab2
The problem is, Nelson has admitted to adding "notes," under Moore's signature. If the "writing seems consistent with one writer" and Nelson has admitted to what she added, this whole thing is one big inconsistent mess.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
Yes where she said she made notes? She certainly doesn't say she forged the yearbook.
Could you show it? Word for word?
He wrote in my Yearbook, He wrote in my Yearbook As Follows, "To a Sweeter, More Beautiful girl I could not say Merry Christmas Christmas 1977 Love, Roy Moore Old Hickory House.
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Grambler
What are you talking about. You think Roy Moore is innocent because she said her noted were his.
You think the special council case is bust because 1/3 of Mueller team donated to democrats and his right hand man was "Clinton lawyer"
Your literally spouting network propaganda.