It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: dragonridr
No because you would stillhave to store the information eveen if it wasnt rendered in case it needs to be. To give you an idea to map aa human and the current positions of each cell would require more computing power then we have on the entire planet.
and if reality is a simulation then this quoted below really isn't an issue
I don't think there is a computer big enough to simulate everything, like every blade of grass in the 'world' every beach pebble, every leaf, every snow flake (with every flake thought to be unique ?) every raindrop, and so on ?
in which you agreed to.
If we are in simulation then our computers are a part of it.
Yes, the computers that we have knowledge of cannot process anywhere near that much info.
However, if the OP is saying reality is a simulation then something which we know as computers that run small simulations here for us to use for whatever purpose is most likely the only way of understanding what is running the simulation we experience as reality.
Who or what programmed the machine running the simulation or who or what created the computer to run simulations on is a whole other ball game of wild speculation and imagination.
Nonsense you dont get to use magic computers. Information needs tobe stored and requires space to do it. A computer simulation works by keeping track of interactions between objects. As i said earlier just keeping track of whats going on in 1 person requires more computing power then we currently possess.
Wow!
You are really struggling with this aren't you...
One last time for you...
The computing power we currently possess is IRRELEVANT.
If our reality is a computer simulation, our computing power is part of the simulation.
The computing power running the simulation IS NOT our computing power.
The computing power running the simulation is OUTSIDE of the simulation, OUTSIDE of our reality.
Is this really too much of a concept to grasp??
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Ruiner1978
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
a reply to: dragonridr
No because you would stillhave to store the information eveen if it wasnt rendered in case it needs to be. To give you an idea to map aa human and the current positions of each cell would require more computing power then we have on the entire planet.
and if reality is a simulation then this quoted below really isn't an issue
I don't think there is a computer big enough to simulate everything, like every blade of grass in the 'world' every beach pebble, every leaf, every snow flake (with every flake thought to be unique ?) every raindrop, and so on ?
in which you agreed to.
If we are in simulation then our computers are a part of it.
Yes, the computers that we have knowledge of cannot process anywhere near that much info.
However, if the OP is saying reality is a simulation then something which we know as computers that run small simulations here for us to use for whatever purpose is most likely the only way of understanding what is running the simulation we experience as reality.
Who or what programmed the machine running the simulation or who or what created the computer to run simulations on is a whole other ball game of wild speculation and imagination.
Nonsense you dont get to use magic computers. Information needs tobe stored and requires space to do it. A computer simulation works by keeping track of interactions between objects. As i said earlier just keeping track of whats going on in 1 person requires more computing power then we currently possess.
Wow!
You are really struggling with this aren't you...
One last time for you...
The computing power we currently possess is IRRELEVANT.
If our reality is a computer simulation, our computing power is part of the simulation.
The computing power running the simulation IS NOT our computing power.
The computing power running the simulation is OUTSIDE of the simulation, OUTSIDE of our reality.
Is this really too much of a concept to grasp??
No your just not thinking logically at all. Doesn't matter where the computer is it would require more information to be stored then the simulation would have . So if day our universe was a simulation the computer needed to hold that much information would have to be about 10 times as massive as all the matter in out universe. Has nothing to do with where computing power comes from that's just stupid
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ruiner1978
i have to wonder why you put so much effort into avoiding answering a simple question
originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: InhaleExhale
if reality is a simulation then the computer running it is far more complex than any machine we can come up with and so it is my opinion that the computer running it doesnt exist within this dimension or in fact within this universe and is not machine like in nature but more a biological field or being of some epic grandiose scale as to be completely mind boggling
such as shiva in the godhead multi dimensional form
Nonsense you dont get to use magic computers.
As i said earlier just keeping track of whats going on in 1 person requires more computing power then we currently possess. At a minimum our simulation would have to keep track of every atom.
And heres the problem any simulation the computer has to have more storage space then the size of ghe simulation.
Its no issue because the imaginary computer we are speculating about running the simulated reality we experience has that processing power.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: InhaleExhale
Its no issue because the imaginary computer we are speculating about running the simulated reality we experience has that processing power.
that gets a gold star for circular " logic "
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Ruiner1978
Im not struggling at all you just have zero understanding of how computers work. Lets say we have super advanced computers that use spin for on and off. So we have a computer that 1 bit equaled 1 atom. As a bare minimum you would need to use 6 atoms to identify anything with error correction 8 atoms just to label one atom in our universe. Once labeled we can assign it properties You figure minimum of 32 if you wrote the code properly. So i allready need 40 atoms just to define 1 in our universe. So i all ready need 40 times the matter of our galaxy just to assign the basic building blocks. Then comes the interactions that would need tobe programmed between atoms and then the difference between groups of atoms. Lifeforms trough in even more equations because not only do you have to keep up with biological functions but now you have to plan for movement from place toplace and those interactions as well.
Only a fool would think this possible. But heres the realkicker If you believe you’re living in a computer simulation, then everything you think you know about the world—including the concept of computers,planets,stars or your existence—is part of that simulation, and so is completely worthless. Because its all a simulation we have no core information on anything and no data. In other words even debating it is pointless because our reality wouldnt change. Thougicould see people coming despondent if they found out. Which leads to another point if we are simulated wouldnt the creator have theability to remove thoughts that could negatively impact the simulation like oh i dont know thefact were not real. Just creating a simulation for 1 person wouldbemind boggling but billions would be impossible this isnt the matrix.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Ruiner1978
oh FFS - we really do have an evassive little critter dont we
why are you so adamant to avoid answering such a simple question
and my " counter argument " is the question - because as i state - i am now convinced that people are using a flawed view of what a simulation is
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Ruiner1978
You i refer to the second paragraph
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: InhaleExhale
Its no issue because the imaginary computer we are speculating about running the simulated reality we experience has that processing power.
that gets a gold star for circular " logic "
another poster talking about logic in a skunkworks thread based in a speculative idea.
Im not struggling at all you just have zero understanding of how computers work.