U.S House Prepares Contempt Action Against FBI DOJ After Leaks Show Mueller Probe Collusion

I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

a reply to: burntheships

So what we have here is the previous administration was seen to have used the IRS, the Justice Department, and the Intelligence apparatus against political opponents. On top of which, they also allowed the diplomatic corps (State Department) to be run by an individual who was, "extremely careless," in the handling of highly sensitive classified information (indeed, all of it's communications) and, "should have known better," than to have had such communications on an unsecured, privately owned server. That former president Obama knew about Hillary's illegal server is beyond doubt as there were emails from him to her on it and so his goose would have been cooked as well as Hillary's which is why it was found that she never intended to break any laws and thus was not prosecuted under a law in which intent is not a factor.

Throw in the Awans and crew and we have quite a mess that needs cleaning up.

This is worth highlighting:

The dossier, which included salacious allegations about Trump, was paid for in part by the Democratic National Committee and Clinton through a law firm. Nunes and other committee Republicans -- backed by Speaker Paul Ryan -- say they want to investigate whether the Justice Department and FBI may have improperly relied on the dossier to kick-start federal surveillance that caught up Trump associates, without independently confirming the information they used to justify such spying.

Strzok was instrumental in receiving, controlling access to and utilizing the dossier, which gave Hillary and the corrupt DNC a way to exploit Trump and his team. They needed an excuse to wiretap, so they made one up and used the FBI to guard their operations.

Fox News’ James Rosen also reveals Strzok played a key role in agreeing to pay ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele $50,000 to find evidence to further support the dossier’s explosive claims. FBI officials were uncomfortable with the validity of Steele’s findings, yet they moved forward with FISA surveillance anyways.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

A thought crosses my mind, if this phone Strzok was using
Was government property. Ouch.

Someone can do an FOIA on that?

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

Maybe but that doesn't explain the stonewalling from the FBI and why they kept it a secret for so long. Are they afraid that Peter Strzok could be flipped? That guy wasn't just one of many insignificant persons. He interviewed Hillary without recording the conversation ffs. This reeks of coverup.

originally posted by: six67seven


The heat is.........ON!

Trump reloads....
And by all appearances The Intel Panel is done with this game.

Trump,won't stop either until he rests.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: six67seven


The heat is.........ON!

Trump reloads....
And by all appearances The Intel Panel is done with this game.

Trump,won't stop either until he rests.

Well i hope Peter and his female lawyer friend hired extra security because we all know what happens if Hillary feels threatened.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy


The american people deserve to know the truth and how they got played by Obama and Hillary. Scandal free my ass.

He had lots of cover from these agencies. But there are some within
them that did not want to give up our country for this Shadowy Agenda.

Whoever they are, like the one who leaked Loretta and Bill on a plane,
they deserve a Medal of Honor.

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

lol, ya right.

He's the dirty cop caught planting drugs on a dude and now all his collars are in jeopardy of being over turned.

a reply to: darkbake

It may also be the thing that sinks Muellers boat.

Essentially, by banishing him to a desk job ( which is an indication
that his career is over) Mueller sealed Strozk's fate.

Strzok and Page made an inexcusable and stupid mistake
using Government devices on Government time;
not only does this compromise the entire investigation,
it is a potential violation of The Hatch Act.

So then why did Mueller cover this up?

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: projectvxn

Pretty sure this is unprecedented in the history of the FBI.

Some experts think this will have compromised the
Special Counsel investigation and will allow Manafort to
claim this is all a political vendetta.

Crazy times indeed!

I think that it has been going on since JE Hoover days but what is unusual is that it has a spot light on it.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: six67seven


The heat is.........ON!

Trump reloads....
And by all appearances The Intel Panel is done with this game.

Trump,won't stop either until he rests.

For decades Donald Trump has said, "When you hit me, I fight back."

So one of the highest people involved in Mueller investigation is now proven to be a trump hater?

Shocking!

I wonder where all of the leaks from Mueller team and the fbi were coming from?

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

I think firing the guy shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure no one else in his group is implicated.

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

I think firing the guy shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure no one else in his group is implicated.

Yes imagine of the shoe was on the other foot.

Democrats screamed bloody murder when Coney announced Hillary was still being looked out when weiners computer business happened.

Many still claim he cost Hillary the election.

Imagine if he or another higher up responsible for making that announcement was then found out to be sending text about how much he hated Hillary to his mistress.

There would be riots in the streets from democrats!.

But when it's against trump, it's no big deal, and this man's demoting is somehow proof Mueller is doing good, even after he has stonewalled requests for info on this situation for months now.

originally posted by: whywhynot

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

I think firing the guy shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure no one else in his group is implicated.

In a sense, its too late.

The spotlight is now on his group.

Intriguing

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

If Mueller felt the offense was worthy of being fired from the investigation and to ensure objectivity in collecting evidence and building the case going forward...

..what about Manafort's search warrant that was already executed based on an affidavit signed by/authorized by Strozk?

Shouldn't all that evidence collected be *fired,* too?

***

(Or that's what I think Manafort's defense attorneys will try to argue, anyway.)

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: darkbake
I think firing the guy from the investigation shows how far Mueller is willing to go to make sure it is non-partisan.

Maybe but that doesn't explain the stonewalling from the FBI and why they kept it a secret for so long. Are they afraid that Peter Strzok could be flipped? That guy wasn't just one of many insignificant persons. He interviewed Hillary without recording the conversation ffs. This reeks of coverup.

This guy has to testify who gave him his marching orders.

a reply to: burntheships

I notice this thread is eerily quiet!

It makes sense, as all of the talking points those who have upheld the Rah Rah Russia narrative have gone out of the window.

Things are not looking good for the previous administration, no amount of obfuscation by the MSM can hide this fact.

Pandora's box has been opened and the light is shining upon everything that has been hiding in the shadow.

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Here's my question:

Has Strozk ever filled out an FBI Form 302 based on interviews with witnesses and suspects in cases involving political and/or politically-connected figures?

The FBI Form 302 policy is an open door for corruption and there is no good reason behind it.

Until that policy changes, the FBI cannot be trusted.