It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whywhynot
This should launch an investigation into the partisan bias of the entire Special Council group. A lot of evidence has already come out showing that the group is biased lib. Now this!
We need a special council to investigate Mueller’s group. I’m not kidding.
Sean has been doing a decent job of it.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil
What about it? What do you think these interviews should entail. A single light bulb close over a suspects head. Thumb screws, deprivation of food and water? So what if a Clinton supporter attended the interview? Was he the only one? Were questions that needed asking avoided? Would other agents who might have been in attendance not have objected? This really is nothing. Everybody has an opinion. They don't matter as long as you can still do your job. Most people are capable of keeping personal and professional separate. Again making a mountain out of a mole hill to try and discredit the special counsel and the work Mueller is doing.
A long twisted round about way that is stupid and in the end won't matter.
Good morning, I’m still reporting on: Sen Grassley - Comey Colluded With Clinton, 1683
Synopsis: Senator Chuck Grassley took to the Senate floor on Thursday and delivered a blistering indictment of already disgraced former FBI Director Jim Comey, for colluding with Hillary Clinton help her in her election battle with Donald Trump. Grassley also proved that both House Democrat leader Nancy Polosi and Senate Democrat leader Chuck Shumer continued to pretend that President Trump was under criminal investigation by the FBI, when, in fact, Director Comey had already told them in no uncertain terms that he was not. This allowed months of fake news stories about collusion between Trump and the Russians to proliferate in the MSM in a failed attempt to try to build sufficient momentum for his impeachment. Grassley’s comments show how Comey, the Democrats and the MSM colluded in this shameful scheme that continues to this day and should serve as a warning to every voter to beware of future anti-Trump fake news stories.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy
What's your source for that bullcrap?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy
What's your source for that bullcrap?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot
No it shouldnt. That's ridiculous.
These people are professionals who do a job without personal feelings being involved.
Or do you imagine... they will fabricate evidence?
Explain to me what anyone's opinion of trump or political affiliations has to do with their ability to do the professional jobs they've been doing all along, some for decades?
How are they suddenly corrupted in your mind when they have been so well respected in their fields?
Or is it just trump who has polluted the playing field? With his name calling and lies that everybody is now so well aware of? His scheming and deception and corruption so prevalent that he believes everyone is as filthy as he is.
And he's spread that ugliness. He continues to try and spread it still.
It's not going to work.
The counsel is healthy and capable and will continue its work unimpeded.
This nonsense will pass with no effect.
.
While he was Maryland’s chief federal prosecutor, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s office failed to interview the undercover informant in the FBI’s Russian nuclear bribery case before it filed criminal charges in the case in 2014, officials told The Hill.
And the prosecutors did not let a grand jury hear from the paid informant before it handed up an indictment portraying him as a “victim” of the Russian corruption scheme, or fully review his extensive trove of documents until months later, the officials confirmed.
The decisions backfired after prosecutors conducted more extensive debriefings of William Campbell in 2015, learning much more about the extent of his undercover activities and the transactions he engaged in while under the FBI’s direction, the officials said. The debriefings forced prosecutors to recast their entire criminal case against former Russian uranium industry executive Vadim Mikerinn— removing the informant as a star witness and main victim for the prosecution, the officials added.
James Brower
🍦
🍦 @jbro_1776
4h4 hours ago
Scoop: Four other members of the Special Counsel shared similar texts/emails of Anti-Trump sentiments with others within and outside of the Probe. These are high ranking lawyers that are involved in the Probe.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil
What about it? What do you think these interviews should entail. A single light bulb close over a suspects head. Thumb screws, deprivation of food and water? So what if a Clinton supporter attended the interview? Was he the only one? Were questions that needed asking avoided? Would other agents who might have been in attendance not have objected? This really is nothing. Everybody has an opinion. They don't matter as long as you can still do your job. Most people are capable of keeping personal and professional separate. Again making a mountain out of a mole hill to try and discredit the special counsel and the work Mueller is doing.
A long twisted round about way that is stupid and in the end won't matter.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
Ruh Roah...
James Brower
🍦
🍦 @jbro_1776
4h4 hours ago
Scoop: Four other members of the Special Counsel shared similar texts/emails of Anti-Trump sentiments with others within and outside of the Probe. These are high ranking lawyers that are involved in the Probe.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot
Of course he had to... for optics.
Wanna bet this doesn't lead to anything?
Wanna bet that this investigation continues right to trumps door?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot
Of course he had to... for optics.
Wanna bet this doesn't lead to anything?
Wanna bet that this investigation continues right to trumps door?
FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel’s Office had interviewed Michael Flynn
originally posted by: IAMTAT
Jeezus!
Strzok was also the guy who interviewed Flynn.
FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel’s Office had interviewed Michael Flynn
saraacarter.com...