It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Call it a win for the federal government - mostly. The Court has issued a ruling in the battle between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Coinbase, a company which facilitates transactions of digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, to determine whether the IRS is entitled to customer data. Today, the Court granted in part and denied in part the federal government's petition to enforce the hotly contested summons: in other words, the IRS may legally investigate Coinbase account holders who may not have paid federal taxes on their virtual currency profits, but the scope of the summons has been dramatically narrowed.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Riffrafter
Why shouldn't people pay taxes on their crypto-currency gains? I have to pay them on my other financial instruments and investments.
originally posted by: peter_kandra
Paying your taxes is fine. A big draw towards crypto-currencies is their anonymity (mostly).
Having the IRS all over the data pretty much eliminates that.
Why shouldn't people pay taxes on their crypto-currency gains? I have to pay them on my other financial instruments and investments.
originally posted by: intrptr
Caesar's face is not on the coin. Bit coin is not a coin of the realm. That just pissses Trajan off, don't it...
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: intrptr
Caesar's face is not on the coin. Bit coin is not a coin of the realm. That just pissses Trajan off, don't it...
Your lack of knowledge about investment and taxable gains is not really relevant. I'd tell you to go educate yourself but I have better things to do like clip my toenails.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: intrptr
The topic is about paying taxes on investments which you obviously do not understand which is why you resorted to hysteric hyperbole.
I would teach you about investing but I don't really have the time today. Or tomorrow.
Or ever.
originally posted by: Riffrafter
Call it a win for the federal government - mostly. The Court has issued a ruling in the battle between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Coinbase, a company which facilitates transactions of digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, to determine whether the IRS is entitled to customer data. Today, the Court granted in part and denied in part the federal government's petition to enforce the hotly contested summons: in other words, the IRS may legally investigate Coinbase account holders who may not have paid federal taxes on their virtual currency profits, but the scope of the summons has been dramatically narrowed.
IRS Nabs Big Win Over Coinbase In Bid For Bitcoin Customer Data
I knew this was going to happen eventually.
All governments *hate* Bitcoin and all crypto currencies.
Now the war will really begin...
originally posted by: intrptr
Under the radar insults aren't working, this time. You whined about how you have to pay taxes and bit coin doesn't. May I recommend another investment, like bitcoin?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: intrptr
Under the radar insults aren't working, this time. You whined about how you have to pay taxes and bit coin doesn't. May I recommend another investment, like bitcoin?
But you do have to pay taxes on Bitcoin proceeds. You'd know this if you understood investing. Or tax policy. Which you don't.
Paying taxes on Bitcoin income Tax compliance is a topic of concern for small businesses. We aren't accountants or lawyers, and can't give legal or accounting advice. But in many respects, Bitcoin transactions work very much like cash. Just like Bitcoin, cash is anonymous and doesn't leave a paper trail, yet is widely used in commerce every day. Ask yourself how you would handle a cash transaction. Do you accept cash transactions? Do you normally pay taxes on cash transactions? The answer for Bitcoin should probably be the same. As for how to decide what a Bitcoin transaction is worth: the IRS, as far as we know, has never issued a guide mentioning how to value Bitcoin transactions. But they have rules and guidelines on how to value transactions made in foreign currency or "cash equivalents". We imagine the accounting would be similar. With Bitcoins, there's likely to be some difference between the value of BTC when you received them as payment, versus when you go to exchange them for another currency like USD, should you decide to do so. This scenario, likewise, would be no different if you accepted foreign currency or gold as payment. Under some scenarios, it might make sense to book the dollar value of BTC income as it is received, and then to book any difference incurred when it is exchanged for fiat currency. Under others, it might make sense to book the whole thing at the time of exchange. Perhaps you might talk to your accountant. You don't need to get into a discussion with your accountant about block chains and private keys or the philosophy behind a decentralized currency. By comparing the fundamentals of Bitcoins to accounting concepts already well understood by the public, you can probably get all the answers you need. What would you ask your accountant if you decided that you wanted to accept Berkshire Bucks or 1-ounce gold coins as payment?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: notsure1
Yep it even says it right there on BC's website.
This should only come as a surprise for people who don't understand investing.
originally posted by: face23785
Which is probably most of the people buying it.