It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If everyone had say, 30 guns, imagine how many more accidents there would be?
Unfortunately no headway will ever be made in this debate due to this reason....
My question is ''why?''. Why debate the gun issue. Why not a discussion. The gun debate will solve nothing as either side of that debate is intractable. It has been debated, and argued TO DEATH.. That ''debate' is over and done. It has rung down the curtain and joined the choir in-visa-bule. This,,, is a dead,,,,debate.
To be be a debate, both sides must present their points with agreed upon parameters and contexts. To be a debate, either side or an agreed upon third party must have the capacity and knowledge of those parameters and contexts to
acknowledge the superior presentation.
We have none of that here. Not just this thread, but all of ATS. All we have is a forum for argument or discussion.
And that is our choice. Do we argue it or discuss it.
originally posted by: Templeton
There might be fewer gun deaths, especially suicides but we would see more vehicle attacks. And we would be helpless to stop them. That was a fun exercise, now let's imagine if every eligible citizen was required to carry a firearm and attend safety classes.
Cathexis: the investment of libido in objects. An example would be Freud's enormous cathexis of interest around sexuality. Cathexes correspond to ideas, whereas affects are discharge products.
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: Templeton
There might be fewer gun deaths, especially suicides but we would see more vehicle attacks. And we would be helpless to stop them. That was a fun exercise, now let's imagine if every eligible citizen was required to carry a firearm and attend safety classes.
And people who still want to inflict mass damage would use a vehicle because they know everyone has a gun.
What are you going to do with your 9mm hand gun in your pants against a van going 60mph through a crowed of people?
I understand the logic, but it's not as black and white as you make it out to be. If everyone had a weapon, then someone will just think of some other way to NOT get shot. Example, what happened in Vegas, or yes vehicle attacks.
I recently realized that the UK and US's views on gun control are so diametrically opposed
If no-one had guns, think how hard it would be to get hold of one? Would this result in less shootings or more?
originally posted by: PerfectAnomoly Americans believe that a society with more guns is a safer society, the more guns the better.
If everyone had say, 30 guns, imagine how many more accidents there would be? How would this affect the number of shootings that happen?