It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: burntheships
Can you please show what prominent democrats agree with this nonesense??
originally posted by: burntheships
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: burntheships
Can you please show what prominent democrats agree with this nonesense??
If Podesta or DWS lied to congress it could be perjury charges!
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: xuenchen
Still don't see anything that should deem Mueller recuse himself from the Trump investigation. All I see in this thread are Trumpkins trying to make a mountain out of mole hill to provide shade for Donald Trump.
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No they will need to charge Hillary first.
And second, and Third.
Trump is not even under investigation....
originally posted by: Dudemo5
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: RazorV66
They are very nervous.
I think perhaps they have lost control of the narrative and are
running out of time to scheme.
They've got to keep you guys in a constant state of rage against the opposition, or you'll get discouraged and tune out of the political process. And then you won't show up to support your guy at the booth. Which of course they can't abide.
Every race since the Daytona 500 has had a smaller audience year-over-year, and the last three weeks have seen double-digit drops in viewers and ratings compared to the 2016 season.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Mach2
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Mach2
1) I'm not a Democrat
2) Mueller is a Republican
3) Mueller still wasn't involved with the Uranium One deal.
1) I'll take your word for it.
2)RINO maybe, but that is irrelevant to the
fact that he was head of the FBI.
3) maybe not "involved" in the deal itself,
but he was investigating it, and allowed
the investigation to be shut down. This is
not even in dispute.
No. he wasn't investigating it. He was just overseeing the FBI while someone else was investigating it, but to believe he was personally involved is just wishful thinking.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DanteGaland
It's really sad and scary at the desperation Trump supporters are showing to side line Mueller's investigation.
originally posted by: DanteGaland
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DanteGaland
It's really sad and scary at the desperation Trump supporters are showing to side line Mueller's investigation.
As I said...they should FOCUS on saving their NASCAR.
Politicians come and go...
But Stock Cars endlessly circle a track!!!
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: DanteGaland
It's really sad and scary at the desperation Trump supporters are showing to side line Mueller's investigation.
Former CIA Director Leon Panetta said those are enough red flags to warrant an investigation.
"Well, it certainly makes the situation very awkward," Panetta nodded. "If you're testifying and saying you have no knowledge and the attorney sitting next to you is one of those that knew what, what was involved here, I think it does raise an issue that the committee is going to have to look at and determine just exactly who knew what."