Richard Spencer speech at Florida campus sparks mass protest (live stream)

a reply to: olaru12

51 people caused a ruckus? It's dubbya dubbya tree!



I didn't see any of it honestly. No interest in giving any of the fools my time. Both parts of the same whole.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: olaru12

51 people caused a ruckus? It's dubbya dubbya tree!

I didn't see any of it honestly. No interest in giving any of the fools my time. Both parts of the same whole.

www.nationalreview.com...


Yep.

a reply to: luthier

Yay, it's Jerry F/ing Springer redux in 2017. Problem is, when we laughed at those fools on Jerry Springer, no one thought that would turn into common societal behavior. Hoo boy.

originally posted by: luthier

Are you more likely to be killed by a Muslim terrorist or a non Muslim?

Guess there is no reason to track extremists when there is Chicago. ...

Are gang members extremists?

Why didn't you add "terrorist" to the end of "non Muslim"?

a reply to: Xtrozero

Are people who murder 50 people a weekend terrorists? I would say so.

You have to wonder why it isn't classified legaly that.

Probably because more than the ones given credit for the murders are responsible and tacit supporters.

At the same time the people born and faced with this war zone trting to get ahead wothout being a thug have war zone schools and not much chance to get ahead in comparison to almost any place in the US. Baltimore also comes to mind. With another corrupt PD. And more terrible murder rates.

The solutions seem to be ...

It's the hand gun laws
It's the Democrats
It's the unions
It's the blacks

Unfortunately the common Chicago political use tag lines don't solve the problem.

Neither does throwing out phones like paper towels.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: 4003fireglo
Excuse me, but Willard's wife Jenny makes the sheets AND the hoods. Low thread count my binary hiney.

I don't know who those people are.

If you have about 6 minutes to spare...

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

a reply to: SlapMonkey


Perfect.

a reply to: Shamrock6

Then how about "Ricardo the Retardo?"

Three Richard Spencer supporters arrested on charges of shooting at UF protesters

www.miamiherald.com...

originally posted by: luthier
Three Richard Spencer supporters arrested on charges of shooting at UF protesters

www.miamiherald.com...

The Fear Brothers. Seriously.

Also, there was an ad for "Phil in the Woods," a Duck Dynasty spinoff which features Phil Robertson unfiltered for $99 per year.

The article mentioned one of the brothers is the leader of a white breeding cult. WTF does that even mean? He has an open family? Take my wife, please? I mean, really. We've got white breeding cults all over the US. They're called small towns.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I'll never really understand why people don't want Richard Spencer to speak anyway.

1. Protesting him only gives him more notoriety.

2. Protesting him makes wingnuts who don't understand what he's about feel sympathetic to him.

3. The more he talks, the more he exposes the toxic nature of alt-right ideology.

4. Ironically, bigots like Richard Spencer are among the only people on the right who aren't afraid to acknowledge the historical reality of systemic racism in the US. He doesn't fuss around with asinine apologetics, he just comes right and says things like that immigration laws originated to keep America white.

ironically some early I mmigration laws came out of the Democrat wing....funny how they were for limiting immigration before they were against it. www.google.com... rders/
That being said ...In this I'd prob be for the protesters ... unless they are antifa

Practically the first thing out of his mouth was a discussion of Marxists and college professors.....
strange for someone who is a proponent of white supremacy.
After all Nazism and Marxism are both out of leftist totalitarian ideals. Wikipedia says he was kicked out of a conservative online magazine.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

If you get to hung up on what side people are on you miss the point.

Conservatives and liberals have not been a linear belief pattern.

Just ask Strom Thurman. (Or his ghost)

The classical liberals are now more libertarians, liberals are lost, and conservatives are hypocritical spenders and moral legislators.

What people forget is we are all humans and the exchange of ideas is a good thing. Superiority whether black, orange, red, white, blue, brown, or rainbows is a truly stupid thing.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

If you get to hung up on what side people are on you miss the point.

Conservatives and liberals have not been a linear belief pattern.

Just ask Strom Thurman. (Or his ghost)

The classical liberals are now more libertarians, liberals are lost, and conservatives are hypocritical spenders and moral legislators.

What people forget is we are all humans and the exchange of ideas is a good thing. Superiority whether black, orange, red, white, blue, brown, or rainbows is a truly stupid thing.

You don't need to lecture me about constructs of liberalism and superiority. I've been posting about Hegelianism and dialectical reasoning here for years. I am not into division via skin color. We are all beings of spirit sparks and the Divine within us all. I Am a devotee of Yogananda and many other amazing spiritual leaders. I understand how Hegelianism and managed conflict work and I see it in action everywhere. A good example is Bush Jr running against John Kerry, both members of the secret society Skull and bones, many of whom go on to become members of the CFR. I could go on for hours talking about this you know. Ive done my homework. It disgusting how the Marxists and Leftists in the media keep conflating this alt-right stuff with true conservatism. That's why I mentioned this guy got kicked out of a conservative online mag. Its truly fascinating when a guy asks college kids if they like Trump tax plan but told its Bernie Sanders plan and they just love it then the guy tells them its really Trumps plan.... the look on their faces and reactions is priceless.... its media conditioning they hate Trump so much.
Marxism is a very real thing being taught in the Universities by Marxist professors.... so Spencer is really right about that. Its just his focus on white people and his alt right thing that's so bad. Cultural Marxists have been messing with our cultural norms since at least the 60's and the goal is to destroy our cultural norms so that we have a Marxist culture of anti family anti capitalism. That's what they do. They destroy beautiful art and replace it with ugly art. That's one of their goals. That is a fact not a theory.
Anyway I hope you have a better feel for where I'm coming from. I don't support this Spencer guy or what he stands for. I don't support Marxist philosophy and economic reforms. I support free enterprise and true liberty and Divine art and culture.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

If you get to hung up on what side people are on you miss the point.

Conservatives and liberals have not been a linear belief pattern.

Just ask Strom Thurman. (Or his ghost)

The classical liberals are now more libertarians, liberals are lost, and conservatives are hypocritical spenders and moral legislators.

What people forget is we are all humans and the exchange of ideas is a good thing. Superiority whether black, orange, red, white, blue, brown, or rainbows is a truly stupid thing.

I would say however that Marxism is decidedly Leftist. Leftists and Marxists have been controlling the Democrat Party for some time now, to the point where many members of Congress are also members of DSA. I kid you not, you just cant make this stuff up. Maxine Waters is a perfect example of that, especially interesting when she spouted off that she wanted the government to take over all the oil companies. Indeed Barack as Potus gave US tax money to a foreign oil company in Brazil which is a nationalized company, while putting a moratorium on American oil drilling in the coastal ocean.....wanna explain that one to me? Ok Ill explain it to you, Barack is steeped in Marxism and communism by his mentor frank marshall davis, and he supported a nationalized oil company over American companies with American tax money.... got the picture??? Its NOT about black and white here, its about Marxism and free enterprise. But the construct is to destroy free enterprise and replace with crony and monopolistic capitalism, in that way the Marxists can say hey look how bad capitalism is weve got to replace it with this socialist program.... see how that works? Now you know how Hegelianism works.
I find it interesting how Democrats and Leftists continually go on about "nationalism", when what they want is to nationionalize industry because that is socialistic. Funny thing how that works.

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

You left out most of the story.

Cronism is hardly a leftist Marxist phenom. We are pretty much already an oligarchy.

Democrats are as different from each other as republicans.

Two sides of the extreme are both authoritarian.

Nativeism is not a healthy free market idea.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

You left out most of the story.

Cronism is hardly a leftist Marxist phenom. We are pretty much already an oligarchy.

Democrats are as different from each other as republicans.

Two sides of the extreme are both authoritarian.

Nativeism is not a healthy free market idea.

I left out half the story? which half was that? Cronyism is used by both left and right. That's the story here. You still manage to lean left even when you are pretending not to take sides. Fascism is not a right wing story no matter what the media says. It has nothing to do with genuine conservative values. Fascism came out of socialist thinking no doubt.
What do you mean by nativism? The Democrats are the ones trotting out their native tribal indigenous peoples at their rallies hoping to attract those people to their socialistic ideals...Its worked so far dontcha think?

a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Lol no.

True liberals and true conservatives don't really exist in the two parties as a voice. They skewer rand Paul all the time.

I do lean left socially. Like a classical liberal. As far as the government I am conservative.

Much more so than the Republicans who called an emergency session in NC to make bathroom laws that lost the sate billions.

The right has attached itself to the social moral legislators. Which isn't a conservative thing to do in terms of the role of government.

Nativism

the policy of protecting the interests of native-born or established inhabitants against those of immigrants.