It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: markovian
I'm still waiting for Graphene heat sinks waterblocks and radiators
It been 10 years still none
The development of the lens still has quite a ways to go before soldiers can scrap those heavy goggles. Right now the graphene only absorbs 2.3 percent of the light. Those percentages have to rise before true night vision can be achieved.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: intrptr
Oh I understand this is still in process, but I cannot see them resolving that simple problem, without, as NightFlight suggested, yet another bit of kit being involved.
However, while terms such as “epitaxial graphene,” “graphene oxide” and “few-layer graphene” are commonly used across industry, prior to the publication of this new standard, there were no universally-agreed definitions — in some cases, material that is hundreds of layers thick has been incorrectly branded “few-layer graphene.” Inconsistencies like this prevent companies that are developing new products from fully understanding the properties of commercially-available graphene-based materials and selecting the material best suited to their application. This is a key barrier to commercialization of new products and prevents trust in the supply chain.
Recognizing the clear industry need, NPL, as part of the U.K. Nanotechnologies Standardization Committee (NTI/1) of the British Standards Institution (BSI), initiated the development of this ISO standard in 2013.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: penroc3
I see only one glaring (did you see what I did there?) issue with the idea of NV contact lenses...
Lets say that one is part of a squad of fellows, tasked to some sneaky acts of daring do, behind enemy lines and equipped to work at night, with these contact lenses. You are carefully picking your way across a courtyard in a compound, having clambered quietly over the wall. All of a sudden, high powered flood lamps and flares bathe the courtyard in tens of thousands of lumens, millions upon millions of candlepowers of light.
Now, with normal NV goggles, although they have their significant limitations, you can at least hinge them up and away from your face, if the lighting circumstances rapidly change. But if your NV is in contact lens form, and you need to get them off in a hurry, I cannot see that working nearly as well.
The problem with what he said was that was back in 2013! Which means they've known how to make it from before that, say the ten year rule, which means the research was done before that.