FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama admin approved nuclear deal with Moscow

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: butcherguy

Yea, I noticed a few of the "regulars" are active on other threads, but scared #less to come into this one. I suppose when you realize a good bit of the charges spit out over the years are actually, true, it kind of takes the wind out of your sails. It reminds me of the thread the other day asking why the conservatives are always on the wrong side of history. This may prove to blow that away in an instant.

Maybe they just have not got here yet? the circle jerk is really really strong with the trump sycophants here today. Almost like this a distortion of the facts to get something on Mueller investigation.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Grambler

I'm not playing victim and I think it is stupid to ignore/dismiss the Trump campaign investigation.

Then-Attorney General Eric Holder was among the Obama administration officials joining Hillary Clinton on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States at the time the Uranium One deal was approved. Multiple current and former government officials told The Hill they did not know whether the FBI or DOJ ever alerted committee members to the criminal activity they uncovered.

Seems to me the FBI was keeping this internal for whatever reason. Going after bigger fish on the Russian side?

Who are the bigger fish? Who were the Russians bribeing , gifting and extorting? Who benefited from this? Hint hint....it's not Donald Trump and we didn't even have to have a special counsel for this.

originally posted by: ausername

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Grambler

They also obtained an eyewitness account — backed by documents — indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow, sources told The Hill

Such information makes me ill to the stomach in light of the public/private views remark. The fact that most media outlets backed that specific candidate makes it all the more frightening.

Really makes you wonder what would have happened if she won?

Imagine the possibilities....

Ummm...OH MY GOD...She...is...Senator Palpatine...



YouSir

a reply to: Kali74

Seems to me the FBI was keeping this internal for whatever reason. Going after bigger fish on the Russian side?

The Russians are bigger fish than turncoats in our own government?

Doubtful that they would be able to ever get their hands of the Russians to arrest or try them.

The whole thing smells of shadow government, deep state.

a reply to: Pyle

"distortion of the facts" are you serious....

you're delusional, the facts are right in front of your face...

the fact the fbi knew this and mueller was director at the time, you really think he would be non bias in this investigation..... seems weird that HE is the one in charge of this doesn't it?..

makes you go hmmmmmm

a reply to: UKTruth

Look at those implicated; hillary, holder, obama, mueller, later comey, mccabe, and others.

Remember, listen to the msm and many on the left. We must leave no stone unturned when investigating russia and there influence here.

Therefore none of them should have any problem into a special investigator looking at this, including the fbis investigation into Hillary's emails., seeing as how fbi leadership is involved in this scandal of possible bribes to hillary.

For the good of the country, right?

And I am sure that the best lawyers for the special investigator to hire will be those that donated to trump. Its only fair, right?

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: butcherguy

Yea, I noticed a few of the "regulars" are active on other threads, but scared #less to come into this one. I suppose when you realize a good bit of the charges spit out over the years are actually, true, it kind of takes the wind out of your sails. It reminds me of the thread the other day asking why the conservatives are always on the wrong side of history. This may prove to blow that away in an instant.

Maybe they just have not got here yet? the circle jerk is really really strong with the trump sycophants here today. Almost like this a distortion of the facts to get something on Mueller investigation.

Wouldn't a good time have been before the sale? When would be a good time?

a reply to: butcherguy

The big story is that the FBI had the information... and the deal went through. What did Obama know and when did he know it???

maybe, if i had another daughter she would look like hillary?

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: butcherguy

Yea, I noticed a few of the "regulars" are active on other threads, but scared #less to come into this one. I suppose when you realize a good bit of the charges spit out over the years are actually, true, it kind of takes the wind out of your sails. It reminds me of the thread the other day asking why the conservatives are always on the wrong side of history. This may prove to blow that away in an instant.

Maybe they just have not got here yet? the circle jerk is really really strong with the trump sycophants here today. Almost like this a distortion of the facts to get something on Mueller investigation.

Great, well you are here.

So explain why this story isn't a big deal or how it's being distorted.

a reply to: loam

The FBI seems to have a severe aversion to letting out information that effects the executive branch or potentially effects an election.

Regardless of whether my interpretation is right or wrong we need to get Russia out regardless if it's one side or both. It appears to be both.

I suspect, that this is just like any other news report regarding Clinton/Obama and company. It goes nowhere. Nothing is investigated, we keep hearing of hints of this or that, but in the end it just goes away and is used as a conversation piece.

a reply to: Grambler

swamp.

just amazing when you really think about it...

a reply to: Kali74

I'm curious. Why is Russia a priority over China or Saudi Arabia (or pick half a dozen of other foreign influencers in American politics) for you?

a reply to: Grambler

2. There is NO WAY Obama was unaware of this. But if that's the argument, the fact that Mueller was in charge and 2009 and apparently said nothing as Obama sold uranium knowing they had eveidence of illegality shows he is incompetent, or criminal, and should not be trusted with an investigation into russia.

You know wanting more control over the FBI is how Trump got that special prospector investigating him and his campaign. The White House is not supposed to have much say in what the FBI does or is investigating. The FBI is independent of the White House other then the White House can Appoint the leader.

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: butcherguy

Yea, I noticed a few of the "regulars" are active on other threads, but scared #less to come into this one. I suppose when you realize a good bit of the charges spit out over the years are actually, true, it kind of takes the wind out of your sails. It reminds me of the thread the other day asking why the conservatives are always on the wrong side of history. This may prove to blow that away in an instant.

Maybe they just have not got here yet? the circle jerk is really really strong with the trump sycophants here today. Almost like this a distortion of the facts to get something on Mueller investigation.

Great, well you are here.

So explain why this story isn't a big deal or how it's being distorted.

It has already been done by a few people now. So feel free to go back through the thread some.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: loam

The FBI seems to have a severe aversion to letting out information that effects the executive branch or potentially effects an election.

Regardless of whether my interpretation is right or wrong we need to get Russia out regardless if it's one side or both. It appears to be both.

Well I agree with the bottom part. Hence why we need a huge investigation into Mueller Obama hillary holder comey, etc. A long with the one on trump.

But why stop at russia? What about chinese, ukranian, british, etc. interference?

And further more, what about collusion with media groups or corporations in the U.S.?

I disagree with the fbi not letting out info. The Intel community has been leaking like a sieve on anything to make trump look bad, and Coney ectivley leaked stuff to the press against trump.

It seems like they are only tight lipped when it comes to other people.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: butcherguy

Yea, I noticed a few of the "regulars" are active on other threads, but scared #less to come into this one. I suppose when you realize a good bit of the charges spit out over the years are actually, true, it kind of takes the wind out of your sails. It reminds me of the thread the other day asking why the conservatives are always on the wrong side of history. This may prove to blow that away in an instant.

Maybe they just have not got here yet? the circle jerk is really really strong with the trump sycophants here today. Almost like this a distortion of the facts to get something on Mueller investigation.

Great, well you are here.

So explain why this story isn't a big deal or how it's being distorted.

It has already been done by a few people now. So feel free to go back through the thread some.

Hahaha! Sure they have!

Thanks for your great contribution to the thread!

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: butcherguy
No mention yet of who the DIRECTOR of the FBI was in 2009...........

Robert S. Mueller III !

How might this affect the Russia investigation f President Trump?
Since the Director of the FBI let this slip by,,, obviously covered it up... and is now investigating the POTUS for what he covered up?

This is how a frame up job is done.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: loam

The FBI seems to have a severe aversion to letting out information that effects the executive branch or potentially effects an election.

Regardless of whether my interpretation is right or wrong we need to get Russia out regardless if it's one side or both. It appears to be both.

Hillary didn't seem to think that way just before the election last year:
Politico

originally posted by: Pyle
a reply to: Grambler

2. There is NO WAY Obama was unaware of this. But if that's the argument, the fact that Mueller was in charge and 2009 and apparently said nothing as Obama sold uranium knowing they had eveidence of illegality shows he is incompetent, or criminal, and should not be trusted with an investigation into russia.

You know wanting more control over the FBI is how Trump got that special prospector investigating him and his campaign. The White House is not supposed to have much say in what the FBI does or is investigating. The FBI is independent of the White House other then the White House can Appoint the leader.

Again, it's ridiculous to assume that Obama would not have been in the loop about this.

This would mean Mueller and the fbi had evidence of wrongdoing from the very people Obama was about to sell uranium to, but intentionally said nothing to him.

we will no doubt them see Obama come out in the coming days and be irrate at this, and demand an investigation into Mueller and hillary.