It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
If they wanted to take your guns why did they not do it after Sandy Hook???
originally posted by: YouSir
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
If they wanted to take your guns why did they not do it after Sandy Hook???
Ummm...isn't the present timeline...after...Sandy Hook...?
YouSir
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
Does anyone else think that giving a whole load of military grade weapons to the same people who voted for George Bush (twice!) and Trump are probably not the best idea?
Its a bit like letting a wife beater work in a women's refuge.
Sorry but I have to be honest and stand by my convictions on this one.
You lot having carte blanche to own pretty much any killing tool you want with very little in the way of restoration or regulation is dumber than two planks of woods.
Your whole concept of a second amendment is broken, the founding fathers would be rolling in their graves to see the horrible situation your obsession with these tools of death has caused. Over 600 kids killed or injured last year thanks to guns, 600, thats mental! All because the you guys have this irrational fear that the redcoats are going to turn up and ensalve you all or your government is going to turn against you all.
If there were not so many people dying form it, it would be hilarious!
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: JDmOKI
How come the most strict gun law areas have the worst crime rates?
With our without gun laws that won't change.
Whats funny is when people say point out Chicago as a example, strict gun laws high gun crime, as if that somehow means we shouldn't have gun laws.
Its like saying a area has a high rate of narcotic related deaths so we just shouldn't have drugs laws.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
If they wanted to take your guns why did they not do it after Sandy Hook???
originally posted by: chrismarco
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
If they wanted to take your guns why did they not do it after Sandy Hook???
The Obama Administration had the ability from 2009-2011 to take the guns...why didn't they? They had total control of congress back then...just something to chew on...I'm sure there are factions within the house that want to legitimately take guns but as a whole they will not...
If they wanted to take your guns why did they not do it after Sandy Hook???
originally posted by: Irishhaf
originally posted by: chrismarco
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
If they wanted to take your guns why did they not do it after Sandy Hook???
The Obama Administration had the ability from 2009-2011 to take the guns...why didn't they? They had total control of congress back then...just something to chew on...I'm sure there are factions within the house that want to legitimately take guns but as a whole they will not...
Because that would have ended the Democratic party in short order, and above all these parasites want to be in power so they will do so in small bites to remove it, or price it out of the grasp of the regular people.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin
You really couldn't sound any more ignorant here...I think its time to back away from the keyboard lol.
I think its time you lot considered if your constitutionally gauranteed penis enlargements are really worth so many deaths each year?