Associated Press Corrects Big Falsehood In Four Trump-Russia Reports

a reply to: ColdWisdom

So 17 3 4....
Doesn't really matter does it?

You don't think they're going to finally say oops we were wrong do you?

You don't think this changes any facts that Russia hacked us do you?
Because it doesn't change a god damned thing.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ColdWisdom

So 17 3 4....
Doesn't really matter does it?

You don't think they're going to finally say oops we were wrong do you?

You don't think this changes any facts that Russia hacked us do you?
Because it doesn't change a god damned thing.

Wiretap, unmasking, does it really matter.

Obams still acted outrageously.

Yet you called trump a liar for pointing it out.

a reply to: UKTruth

Breitbart.
Pffft too funny.
That rag.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Feel free to back that claim, all agreed in some fashion, up with a link to your source.

a reply to: Sillyolme

I can understand why this upsets you, since you are one of those who repeated this misinformation many, many times on these forums. Clapper clarified this months ago in his congressional testimony, which was pointed out many times, and yet the lies continued.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Breitbart.
Pffft too funny.
That rag.

and yet Breitbart is not the one who has had to retract articles...

a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Like it matters.
You guys .
Every day you grasp at the flimsiest straws to make yourselves believe this is going away.
Every single day.
Last night it was Eric Holder tweeting secret messages to dems about running for the hills instead of what he actually said which was be strong.

The arguments get weaker every day.
Trump gets more desperate and crazy every day.
He'll be peeling on the Whitehouse lawn soon.

originally posted by: redtic

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Pyle

It clearly says "Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment". How do you know they agree if they weren't involved in making the assessment? Because you were lied to, and you believed it.

So do you trust the assessment that was made by the 3? Do you think the other 13 would come to a different conclusion if they had the chance to do their own assessment? It's not as if the other 13 dissented. This is more of technical detail than a bombshell - the top three intelligence agencies in the US, after making their own independent assessment, all agree that Russia was behind the election hacking. That's a pretty strong statement.

it doesn't matter to trump voters what anyone in our government says. they believe EVERYTHING trump says....Russia has won, they have their Manchurian candidate.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Because they never would. Please. You're not going to successfully argue Breitbart into ligitimacy.
Lol ...that is never gonna happen.

PS The National Enquire and the world news never print retraction either.

Breitbarts a joke, like they are.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Direct from the AP

WASHINGTON (AP) — In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies — the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency — and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment.

originally posted by: Pyle

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Pyle

It clearly says "Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment". How do you know they agree if they weren't involved in making the assessment? Because you were lied to, and you believed it.

Because they can read the assessment and agree with it. Do you need to be involved in a report to read and agree with it?

They can, yes, now show they did.

originally posted by: jimmyx

originally posted by: redtic

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Pyle

It clearly says "Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment". How do you know they agree if they weren't involved in making the assessment? Because you were lied to, and you believed it.

So do you trust the assessment that was made by the 3? Do you think the other 13 would come to a different conclusion if they had the chance to do their own assessment? It's not as if the other 13 dissented. This is more of technical detail than a bombshell - the top three intelligence agencies in the US, after making their own independent assessment, all agree that Russia was behind the election hacking. That's a pretty strong statement.

it doesn't matter to trump voters what anyone in our government says. they believe EVERYTHING trump says....Russia has won, they have their Manchurian candidate.

Clinton did not win the election so no Russia doesn't have their Manchurian candidate.

Secondly the intelligence agencies in question never got to examine the DNC server so no they didnt come to an independent assessment. They relied on crowdstrike, whose methods failed in Ukraine... The same method was used for the "russia hacked the DNC" bs.

Finally the "top 3 intel agencies" only said they were moderately confident it was russia...

If you guys are going to try and spin it get your facts right.

a reply to: BlueAjah

So what? Why is this important?
Does it change the fact that Russia hacked the election?
NO, IT DOESN'T.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Breitbart has more credibility than CNN, the NYT, AP and currently, you.

Still waiting for you to cite your source to support your claim.

a reply to: Xcathdra

That's just your opinion.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: BlueAjah

So what? Why is this important?
Does it change the fact that Russia hacked the election?
NO, IT DOESN'T.

Except there is no verifiable evidence Russia hacked anything.

I wonder if this clarification, along with Holder's tweet, might mean that some agencies are going to come out now and say that not only do they disagree with the original report, but it was WRONG.

It makes them look incompetent if their agencies are on record agreeing with a false report.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

That's just your opinion.

Based on facts coupled with the number of corrections some media outlets are churning out.

Breitbart is crap.
It's a rag tabloid
Today lacks any credibility at all.
And I can prove the lies and bull #.

The money must be drying up fast at over at Correct the Record. Less and less people trying to spin lately.