It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Chadwickus
In order for it to be blasphemous wouldn't you first have to prove that god existed .
originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: Raggedyman
Sure he may have offended some. Is that any reason to waste taxpayers money prosecuting him?
Hell, what he said about kids getting cancer making him think god was a maniac is pretty reasonable isn't it?
originally posted by: seagull
a reply to: Chadwickus
You aren't kidding, are you?
Blasphemy?
I don't even know what to say to that...
...
Got nothin'.
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: grainofsand
So if you are not an atheist would you share which deity you believe in?
There's only one and if you had the mind for it you'd know that.
originally posted by: Raggedyman
originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: Raggedyman
Sure he may have offended some. Is that any reason to waste taxpayers money prosecuting him?
Hell, what he said about kids getting cancer making him think god was a maniac is pretty reasonable isn't it?
dont go all triggered sjw on me Sprock, not my country, not my laws.
The Irish laws, the Irish taxpayer, the Irish voters who placed those who make the laws of the land in power.
Right or wrong in your opinion is irrelevant, they are the laws, abide by those laws or get charged
Little arrogant dictators like you demanding everyone lives by your standard is a as bad to me as those Irish laws that had Mr Fry charged
You are them, just on the other side of the fence, having a big sob because others wont listen to you
The middle ground is to accept that Ireland is not your country, dont visit them
If I ever go, I wont bad mouth anyone so as not to offend anyone.
Hell, thanks to religion, not so long ago it was legal for a man to rape his wife in the UK.
And what other concepts do you accept from people with no proof?
originally posted by: namelesss
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Chadwickus
In order for it to be blasphemous wouldn't you first have to prove that god existed .
Nope.
For 'blasphemy' to exist, the existence of God must be assumed/accepted.
And in certain societies, that is exactly the case; no 'proof' necessary.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
a reply to: Raggedyman
It is impossible to have a conversation with you. You have invented your own religion, and expect everyone to understand exactly what you believe. Then you toss out insults to anyone who disagrees with you. You don't believe in Christianity but you use the Bible to argue your points. Then when someone else tries to point out that the Bible is stupid, you toss out that you don't believe in the Bible. Talking to you is a waste of time.
originally posted by: SprocketUK
a reply to: Raggedyman
Well, talking of votes, I was mostly on about the UK where most of our laws were put in place by unelected people way back. Do bishops get to vote on laws in Ireland?
By the way, if you are a Christian and believe in hell, then you are going to that hell mate, cos your attitude stinks massively.
Try walking the walk instead of taking the talk.
No, that is your belief, you don't 'know' that about any claims of gods so it is dishonest to present your belief as fact.
Lol, are you going all cryptic and mystic on me now LMAO!