Google Redefines The Word ‘Fascism’ To Smear Conservatives, Protect Liberal Rioters

a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

You apparently don't understand that fascism has always been considerd a right-wing ideology. People here confuse it with American political left and right system. Nobody is trying to "change" it. Actually conservatives are the ones who started this BS because they don't want to be associated with fascism. Do you see us "leftists" trying to distance ourselves from communism and USSR?

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

You apparently don't understand that fascism has always been considerd a right-wing ideology. People here confuse it with American political left and right system. Nobody is trying to "change" it. Actually conservatives are the ones who started this BS because they don't want to be associated with fascism. Do you see us "leftists" trying to distance ourselves from communism and USSR?

Really? Funny how who is "left" and who is "right" changes so frequently. History (at least until it is permanently changed) has shown us the current "Left" party (Democrats) were the party of racism and the KKK while the "Right" party (Republicans) were the party of Lincoln and abolished slavery. The definition of left and right have changed many times throughout history. For one who speaks under the pretense of being so knowledgeable in history I would think that you know that, or you're pretending you don't- makes no difference to me.

a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

You are talking about America. It's not the same thing. And thanks for proving my point about confusing it with the American political system.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

You are talking about America. It's not the same thing. And thanks for proving my point about confusing it with the American political system.

Not confusing anything, the standards of what is "right" and what is "left" is fluid on a worldwide scale. Go study that history you think you know so well. Saviors and Saints of nations in one decade become the tyrants and fascists a few decades later. Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Castro, etc. were all considered the good guys by their people at one time. Now go have a Hot Pocket and cool down.

a reply to: GeauxHomeYoureDrunk

A party governing a nation “totalitarianly" is a new departure in history. There are no points of reference nor of comparison. From beneath the ruins of liberal, socialist, and democratic doctrines, Fascism extracts those elements which are still vital. It preserves what may be described as "the acquired facts" of history; it rejects all else. That is to say, it rejects the idea of a doctrine suited to all times and to all people. Granted that the XIXth century was the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy, this does not mean that the XXth century must also be the century of socialism, liberalism, democracy. Political doctrines pass; nations remain. We are free to believe that this is the century of authority, a century tending to the " right ", a Fascist century. 

Straight out of Mussolini's mouth.

www.worldfuturefund.org...

The NAZIs were national socialists. National. Like nationalists. They threw in the "socialist" into their name because socialism was popular at the time. Popular. Like populists. Populists like Trump. NAZIs hated leftists and good art because they were far right. Far right does not equal conservative.

Google hasn't changed the definition; they've just expanded on it.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

Please inform me what facts I listed were incorrect. Please inform me which of those programs would be considered right wing? To say I'm embarrassing myself is not a response to a factual argument.

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

I will give you two examples of why Nazis and Fascist Italy were right-wing using American political system to start with.
Were they traditionalists? Yep. So that's right-wing.
Were they against equality but for social stratification? Yep. So that's right-wing.
So that would make them conservatives with those two examples.

Another example of this is to google.
"Black pride"
"Hispanic pride"
"Gay pride"
Then
"White pride"
Google has been SJW'ing for years now!

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TobyFlenderson

"Not to my liking"? Huh? Historians have always considered Fascism a right-wing ideology, and as someone else mentioned, it isn't an American political party.
BTW Mussolini himself said that Fascism tends to the right. Right out of horse's mouth.
Stop muddling up the issue.
BTW just because Nazis had the word socialism in it doesn't mean they were. Please study your history.

And HISTORIANS have almost all been LEFT LEANING. Hmm seems to be a matter of deflecting blame to your political enemies.

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TobyFlenderson

"Not to my liking"? Huh? Historians have always considered Fascism a right-wing ideology, and as someone else mentioned, it isn't an American political party.
BTW Mussolini himself said that Fascism tends to the right. Right out of horse's mouth.
Stop muddling up the issue.
BTW just because Nazis had the word socialism in it doesn't mean they were. Please study your history.

And HISTORIANS have almost all been LEFT LEANING. Hmm seems to be a matter of deflecting blame to your political enemies.

Prove it?
And why would Republicans be my political enemies? It's pretty sad that you see each party as enemies to each other.

a reply to: JAY1980

What should "white pride" be then?

originally posted by: Deaf Alien

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: TobyFlenderson

"Not to my liking"? Huh? Historians have always considered Fascism a right-wing ideology, and as someone else mentioned, it isn't an American political party.
BTW Mussolini himself said that Fascism tends to the right. Right out of horse's mouth.
Stop muddling up the issue.
BTW just because Nazis had the word socialism in it doesn't mean they were. Please study your history.

And HISTORIANS have almost all been LEFT LEANING. Hmm seems to be a matter of deflecting blame to your political enemies.

Prove it?
And why would Republicans be my political enemies? It's pretty sad that you see each party as enemies to each other.

Majority nations that scholars lived were dictatorial,and ran by kings,warlords. So as such they were controlled by their leaders. History is flawed and in accurate to a degree due to this. Notice i also said ALMOST all historians were left leaning. And I didnt say YOU were deflecting. I was saying the HISTORIANS were doing so.

a reply to: yuppa

So what did you think about Mussolini's quote that I posted?

a reply to: infolurker

Yes Conservatives are on the Right but there's much further right to go on the spectrum.



The Daily Caller is flat out wrong. Google is correct.

originally posted by: neo96

an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.

I will give you 4 examples of why this is bullsnip.

1.social security.
2.medicare.
3. gun control.
4. Climate regulation.

ALL RIGHT WING authoritarianism and nationalism.

So you're a Leftist now? Lol

a reply to: Kali74

Nope.

Just pointing out that social programs aka SOCIALISM is a LEFT wing trait.

Not right wing.

a reply to: neo96

Um the topic is about fascism, not socialism.

a reply to: neo96

You just said, as quoted above, that Social Security etc... was Right Wing authoritarianism. You oppose those things so that makes you a Leftist doesn't it?

You confused yourself... again.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

I am talking about the topic.

Even the worlds greatest fascist agrees with me.

But we National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.

The National Socialist State recognizes no ‘classes’. But, under the political aspect, it recognizes only citizens with absolutely equal rights and equal obligations corresponding thereto.

en.wikiquote.org...

The Fuhrer himself.