The strangest Coincidence regarding the Pentagon attack on 9/11

a reply to: samkent

The mainstream media would cover for Bush? All the colleges would cover for Bush?

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Angel666

Who was talking about Bush? Can you explain how flight 77 passengers and crew ended up dead at the pentagon?

Can you reveal what remains were released to the surviving family members of flight 77 for burial?

How does your perceived lack of video discredit the 100 eyewitnesses that give an account a large commercial jet hit the pentagon, the damage at the pentagon that could only be caused by a large jet, the physical evidence, the DNA evidence, the radar data, and the flight recorder data?

What I can tell you is where is the video evidence the rest is up to you unfortunately mate. Im only stating the obvious truth of the entire matter. So where is the video? Surely someone can find one?
Sometimes my friend its the lack of the obvious, the absence of the normal that should be investigated.
Convert me back from this conspiracy!!!!! Please because it wrecks my head!!!

a reply to: Angel666

Not one video from literally thousands of video cameras.

There were not 'literally thousands of cameras'.

Read this and see what you make of it.

a reply to: Angel666

You do understand all the flight 77 footage was released through freedom of information requests and court battles.

Can you name one instance where a truth group like AE 9/11 filed a freedom of information request or fought a court battle to release pentagon footage? To fight for the truth?

No? truth groups want to milk the conspiracy cow. Not get to the truth.

Name or cite a source listing what footage is missing from what cameras.

And again, cite how this has anything to do with the overwhelming physical evidence and data.

And you do understand groups like Scientists for 9/11 Truth are stating how large jet deniers are ignoring overwhelming evidence and hurting the cause.

a reply to: neutronflux

You suggested that not everybody supported the official story 100%. Perhaps a bad assumption on my part, but I assumed that you were speaking at least partly for yourself.

If you're not in for 100%, I was simply curious as to how much of the official story you do believe and support. If you prefer not to answer, I would understand.

a reply to: Salander

You need to start with what hit the pentagon, and those claims of eyewitnesses you cannot produce.

All you have is unsubstantiated claims.

a reply to: D8Tee

Was there 1 camera? Just to dispell the conspiracy.

originally posted by: Angel666
a reply to: D8Tee

Was there 1 camera? Just to dispell the conspiracy.

Video evidence been done to death in this thread.

Link

another link

911 Myths is as credibal as the "National Enquire".

I have seen no debunking to death in this thread, but "opinions" and demanding "opinions" as facts.

It is about controlling the OS and nothing else. Everything else is "disingenuous" according to the very few in here.

originally posted by: Informer1958
911 Myths is as credibal as the "National Enquire".

I have seen no debunking to death in this thread, but "opinions" and demanding "opinions" as facts.

It is about controlling the OS and nothing else. Everything else is "disingenuous" according to the very few in here.

The Maguire declaration is not an opinion, it came about as the result of a FOIA request for videos showing the Pentagon impact. How is that an opinion?

Where opinion comes into play is that it's your opinion that the guv is lying to you and has video evidence it is not releasing.

Not everyone is as close minded as you are Informer, some will want to look at the available evidence.

The Maguire declaration and the oral history of Steve Pennington and Brian Austin are both important sources of information to researchers.

You, Informer, can continue on with your drivel about pyroclastic flows and nanothermite all you want, let people make up their own minds as to what is valuable and what is tripe.

a reply to: Angel666

Was there 1 camera? Just to dispell the conspiracy.

There were multiple cameras in NYC but the conspiracy persists.
If you don't want to believe the OS then there is no evidence great enough to convert you to it.

a reply to: D8Tee

You, Informer, can continue on with your drivel about pyroclastic flows and nanothermite all you want, let people make up their own minds as to what is valuable and what is tripe.

I see, and everyone who does not conform to you and your "opinions" are closed minded individuals.

You post 911 Myths as your sources, yet most people who have some real 911 research under their belt know that 911 Myths is a website that is only in support of the OS narratives and nothing else, that website "scoffs", rejects, everything outside the OS narratives, and that is a proven fact. You can call that your Tripe, because that is what it is.

Where opinion comes into play is that it's your opinion that the guv is lying to you and has video evidence it is not releasing.

And yet here you are claiming the very same, that your "opinions" are the correct "opinions" and nothing more.

Pretty juvanal if you ask me.

The Maguire declaration is not an opinion, it came about as the result of a FOIA request for videos showing the Pentagon impact. How is that an opinion?

It is an "opinion" when the very evidence they claim are there, in this FOIA request IS NOT THERE. Perhaps some people prefer their eyes to lie to them, because authority said so.

If you say you see an "airplane" in the only one release video, then knock yourself out!

Who are you to say everyone "opinions" are wrong?

a reply to: samkent

If you don't want to believe the OS then there is no evidence great enough to convert you to it.

I disagree with you about the OS evidence. On the contrary it lacks most of it's evidence to support it's own story.

Just because a lying mainstream properganda News channels say it's true, it doesnt mean it is true. You put our government on a petal stool of no wrong doing. The one fact that most people do support about 911, is there was no investigation.

Without an investigation you have no evidence.

a reply to: Informer1958

Pretty juvanal if you ask me.

Normally I don't make an issue of peoples spelling, but if you're going to keep calling me the same name, (must be the fifth time), at least get it right ok?

It's Juvenile.

Beats being Senile.

Anyways, to reiterate, The Maguire declaration is not an opinion.

You may have an opinion about the Maguire declaration, thats fine, but the declaration itself is evidence, something you never provide.

a reply to: Informer1958

The sites you support are all truther sites look how YOU got fooled re steel temperature how many other things have fooled YOU.

a reply to: Salander

How long since DAY ONE reason being my job involves talking to and discussing STRUCTURES.

NOT one structrat engineer I have spoken to thinks the Towers were brought down by explosives? as for the hole in the Pentgon the main facsde had a collapse after the crash and how many truther sites have posted pictures of internal punch out holes caused by landing gear as the impact point.

Have YOU looked at the impact force calculator yet to work out possible load of a 1000 ton floor slab dropping in the tower collapse.

a reply to: Informer1958

If the NIST reports and the 9/11 commission are so erroneous, should be a simple court case for groups like AE9/11Truth and the pilots for 9/11 Truth to set the record straight.

What legal action, freedom of information requests, and corrections has the truth movement fought for?

All your claims of white washing would make for easy court cases.

I have quoted sources less than 20 percent of the US population believes the government was behind 9/11.

Thanks for presenting facts out of context and straw man arguments to create a false narrative.

Who here totally trusts the government?

The argument is a large jet hit the pentagon.

I guess your juvenile mind blinded by biased hate cannot reason rationally.

a reply to: D8Tee

Normally I don't make an issue of peoples spelling, but if you're going to keep calling me the same name, (must be the fifth time), at least get it right ok?

It's Juvenile.

No, what is juvenal, is you being the spelling police because you have no other arsenal in defending your rants. If your talking about the only video that was released as your holy grail of truth, and evidence of said plane slamming into the Pentagon, and the eyewitness accounts, then you have absulutly nothing for physical evidence.

No different then you telling a (ghost story), with a few eyewitness that claim to have seen one.

a reply to: wmd_2008

The sites you support are all truther sites look how YOU got fooled re steel temperature how many other things have fooled YOU.

You are still fooled, you believe in the OS conspiracy that defies science.

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: D8Tee

Normally I don't make an issue of peoples spelling, but if you're going to keep calling me the same name, (must be the fifth time), at least get it right ok?

It's Juvenile.

No, what is juvenal, is you being the spelling police because you have no other arsenal in defending your rants. If your talking about the only video that was released as your holy grail of truth, and evidence of said plane slamming into the Pentagon, and the eyewitness accounts, then you have absulutly nothing for physical evidence.

Normally I overlook spelling errors, but since the insult has been directed towards me on a half a dozen occasions, I tire of seeing it misspelled. Just trying to help you deny your own ignorance bud. It's Juvenile. Just like Senile, drop the S and add JUV. Doubt you will remember this, senility affects peoples memories, and your's ain't that good.

Plenty of evidence that Flight 77 hit the pentagon. Even Labtop does not deny this and he's researched the story much more than you appear to have.

No different then you telling a (ghost story), with a few eyewitness that claim to have seen one.

Keep telling yourself that, ignore all the evidence. How about your claim of dead bodies in prisoner overalls? You missed the oak leafs on the uniform Informer. When evidence is pointed out to you, there is a refusal to acknowledge it.