It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: soficrow
You would probably appreciate seeing this:
The Story of the Millennium: The AGI Manhattan Project:
Welcome to the Unpossible Future... The AGI Manhattan Project
CHAPTER 2 - Economic World War: Technocratic Plutocrat Elites vs. The People
CHAPTER 3 - The Global Meltdown of FEAR
My original 'legacy series' from mid-2010. Everything I worked towards during the decade. I had several other chapters up in the website I launches specifically for the project. But shortly after I got that far I had Youtube and my paid Photobucket accounts nuked with no route for redemption provided. Totally screwed the media in the bulk of the some 1,000 blog / forum etc posts I had made during those years (many of which had been reposted by others further and wider than I could ever really know).
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: BeefNoMeat
a reply to: soficrow
I'm not sure what news org produced the segment, but it was a 8-10 min piece on the coming revolution in job-killing robots...same actors involved in the research and development: MIT.
Here is June, 2013 article from Technology Review remarking a lot of the same things about robotics: Job-killing Robots At a Plant Near You Soon
The robotics department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is truly revolutionary - now they're mastering AI and telling us our jobs are going bye-bye.
It's coming folks and the solutions a few, if any. Do we want to live an economy where you can get Amazon Prime Now delivery within 2-4 hours? Do we want ever-increasingly, ubiquitous smart phones that can task our lives (e.g. actively do task for you that frees up/eliminates leisure/work time)??
What trade-offs are you willing to make? - is the key question here. How much do you need/want? How much can you go without?
Anyone willing to suggest a trade-off they would make in the face of ever-increasingly capable robotics and AI software??
I'd honestly give up my sovereign driving ability to driver-less cars if it meant less traffic. There's a trade-off off the top of my head...
I'd give up the "luxury" of having to take the overflowing, foul-smelling, easily breakable bin bag out to the curb quite happily, does that count?
Robotic chef can cook Michelin star food in your kitchen by mimicking world's best cooks
A smartphone-controlled robotic chef that can cook world-class food using recipes downloaded from an online store sounds like pure science fiction - but the robot is real, will go on sale in 2017 and just made me a crab bisque.
It is hard to put into words exactly how much the Moley robotic chef feels like it is from the future. A pair of robotic arms suspend from above a conventional kitchen with hob, oven, work surface and sink. They can match the dexterity of human hands, work just as quickly as a professional chef, and are issued commands by an iPhone app.
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: soficrow
The 4th industrialisation is a special kind of terminator.
Indeed, all the evidence so far is that the benefits of the coming change will be concentrated among a relatively small elite, thus exacerbating the current trend towards greater levels of inequality.
This was a point stressed by the Swiss bank UBS in a report launched in Davos. It notes that there will be a “polarisation of the labour force as low-skill jobs continue to be automated and this trend increasingly spreads to middle class jobs.”
Fourth Industrial Revolution brings promise and peril for humanity
originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: PublicOpinion
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: soficrow
The 4th industrialisation is a special kind of terminator.
Indeed, all the evidence so far is that the benefits of the coming change will be concentrated among a relatively small elite, thus exacerbating the current trend towards greater levels of inequality.
This was a point stressed by the Swiss bank UBS in a report launched in Davos. It notes that there will be a “polarisation of the labour force as low-skill jobs continue to be automated and this trend increasingly spreads to middle class jobs.”
Fourth Industrial Revolution brings promise and peril for humanity
Yes. But. Maybe we can direct and control it? Change our economic system, make sure ALL humanity benefits?
Turn the nightmare into a dream?
originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: Ohanka
a reply to: strongfp
Are you sure you wouldn't enjoy your own automated kitchen? And a robot cook making star quality food in your own home? These things are gonna be standard like dishwashers soon...
Robotic chef can cook Michelin star food in your kitchen by mimicking world's best cooks
A smartphone-controlled robotic chef that can cook world-class food using recipes downloaded from an online store sounds like pure science fiction - but the robot is real, will go on sale in 2017 and just made me a crab bisque.
It is hard to put into words exactly how much the Moley robotic chef feels like it is from the future. A pair of robotic arms suspend from above a conventional kitchen with hob, oven, work surface and sink. They can match the dexterity of human hands, work just as quickly as a professional chef, and are issued commands by an iPhone app.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Ohanka
originally posted by: underwerks
Capitalism will be the end of conservatism.
Kind of ironic.
True.
It will also be the end of most of the human race. Since the ultra rich elites that stand to benefit the most from this will no longer have need for the livestock.
The rich will become the food before that happens.
Turn the nightmare into a dream?
Overall, these results give some indication that the common conjecture that citizens demand direct democracy seems to be correct.
Industry in France and Germany should embrace open source, the governments of both countries say in the closing statement of the German-French digital conference in Berlin on 13 December. Open source is a key driver for digital innovation, the countries say.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: soficrow
Hi Soficrow!
“I am less concerned with Terminator scenarios - if current trends continue, people are going to rise up well before the machines do,” said MIT economist Andrew McAfee on the first day at Asilomar.
My counter is this.
Since machines are programmed to fulfill the tasks programmed into them by the overlords, they will make them more lethal and more numerous. Imagine swarms of micro drones unleashed on "riots" and or revolts, each a micro attack drone armed with a mall smart brain that seeks out and attaches to people in the crowd, detonating a small warhead, lethal injection, gas cloud, electric shock.
The options are pretty much endless, the clouds of swarming micro drones don't require airstrikes, tanks, helicopter gun ships, mines or boots on ground to be anywhere near the area targeted. In the future sic fi of Terminator, the "machines " are portrayed as huge tracked vehicles grinding thru the rubble like bulldozers, "John taught us ways to dust them".
Thats not possible with clouds of little screaming attack drones descending from 20000 feet, each programmed to seek out and kill one individual person in a crowd.
Most certainly a "sky net" approach and completely undeveloped as yet.
originally posted by: BeefNoMeat
originally posted by: soficrow
a reply to: PublicOpinion
originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: soficrow
The 4th industrialisation is a special kind of terminator.
Indeed, all the evidence so far is that the benefits of the coming change will be concentrated among a relatively small elite, thus exacerbating the current trend towards greater levels of inequality.
This was a point stressed by the Swiss bank UBS in a report launched in Davos. It notes that there will be a “polarisation of the labour force as low-skill jobs continue to be automated and this trend increasingly spreads to middle class jobs.”
Fourth Industrial Revolution brings promise and peril for humanity
Yes. But. Maybe we can direct and control it? Change our economic system, make sure ALL humanity benefits?
Turn the nightmare into a dream?
Ok, I asked (replied to you) earlier, but I will ask again: what trade-offs are you willing to make? "Turn the nightmare into a dream" is gonna involve a cost, but more importantly, a trade-off. What say, you??