ASSANGE: Obama administration destroying public records ‘now’

a reply to: odzeandennz

Your comment and avatar are the polar opposite of each other.

originally posted by: angryproctologist
a reply to: xuenchen

I also might add that it really is kind of scary to think about how many people (potential witnesses/victims) are either being bribed or murdered by either the Obama administration,Clinton thugs,and alphabet agencies-just to keep Hillary,Wiener,Huma,Pedestal,Soros,BLM terrorists (and quite possibly Obama himself) out of prison.

Like, is Eric Braverman still 'missing'?

a reply to: neo96

That isn't far fetched.

That isn't a vast 'right wing' conspiracy.

Sandy Berger did it for CLinton.

Clinton 'aids' did it for those emails.

But like how are they doing it? Remember during the california primary, shredder trucks were photographed outside the DNC headquarters?

How do they go about shredding stuff in the whitehouse? Do they have their own underground factory wth a smoke stack sticking up out back?

Funny 'shredding room' scene from a funny movie, @:43 seconds into here...

a reply to: xuenchen

Julian is consistent with George Webb in that the documents and evidence they do have should be released and hopefully measures by Trump will preserve these very important paper trails .

So he's offering money to people to support his ridiculous claim?
He doesn't have the proof of his statement. He's just throwning # against the wall to see what sticks at this point.
The loser.

a reply to: UKTruth

You guys reek of despritness.
This is too funny.

a reply to: Sillyolme

He doesn't have the proof of his statement

That's why he is offering money for proof.

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

I'll take the word of Wikileaks over that of the likes of CNN NBC ABC CBS FOX WaPo NYT LAT (all of them combined).

a reply to: thesaneone

Right he doesn't have it .

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Sure you would. No surprise there.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: thesaneone

Right he doesn't have it .

What?????
I don't understand your comment.

a reply to: Sillyolme

When Wikileaks is responsible for pushing wars or covering up the overthrow of governments, that costs the lives of we'll leave it at tens of thousands, then come talk to me about that point. Until then the blood and suffering of millions are on all of their hands.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
So he's offering money to people to support his ridiculous claim?
He doesn't have the proof of his statement. He's just throwning # against the wall to see what sticks at this point.
The loser.

Nobody had proof of Hillary Clinton deleting work related emails either. Or sending classified material on private systems.

.......... Until the FBI recovered them.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: thesaneone

Right he doesn't have it .

I bet he does.

We are seeing the preliminary proof already aren't we.

The whole thing will be exposed before Jan 20th.

Happens all the time in our government. The government has made it harder for bureaucracy to do it but always leaves a way to do this high up on the hill. If they can't hide it appropriately a scape goat is selected to take the bullet.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Obama has a history of obfuscation, perjuring himself, lying to all Americans, and prosecuting whistle blowers in many ways.

Given his 8-year history of prosecuting whistle blowers, I have to laugh at the people asking him to pardon Edward Snowden and Chelsea (Bradley) Manning. There's a much better chance that Snowden will be assassinated and Manning will "commit suicide" while in solitary confinement, then for either to be pardoned by Obama.

a reply to: thesaneone

He's offering money to get the proof he needs to support his, what can only be an assumption at this moment, because now he's got it in for Obama.
He doesn't have anything. He's simply trying to sew seeds.

a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah. What ever...
Not holding my breath.

a reply to: xuenchen

That's an entirely different thing . No one is investigating Obama for anything.

Assange is pissed off because he was called out that's all.
What proof are you seeing to support his claim and why does he have to pay for proof if he has anything?

The more assumptions you have to make the less likely the story is true.

a reply to: Sillyolme

The "reward" is all part of the game.

He is successfully triggering the triggerables.

You will soon see.

I already know.