Fort Lauderdale Airport Shooting Suspect Claims U.S. Intelligence Forced Him to Watch ISIS Videos

The shooter visited the Anchorage Alaska FBI Field Office last November making claims the U.S. Intelligence HAD "Infiltrated his mind" and forced him to watch ISIS Propaganda Videos.

Quite Interesting as this area is riddled with post-HAARP ultra-low frequency experiments. Was stationed up at Elmendorf AFB from 1995-1999. Super weird business going on up there. All I can say.
www.foxnews.com...

Fort Lauderdale Airport Shooting Suspect Claims U.S. Intelligence Forced Him to Watch ISIS Videos

Possibly valid based off 22 years active duty Air Force experience. Truth IS Stranger than Fiction!!!

I have personally witnessed Information Operations, formerly known as PsyOps in the works...this reeks of it!

Tripe on many levels.

a reply to: DickBrisket

Since he chickened-out by not allowing himself to be killed, this murderer apparently didn't pay close enough attention.

a reply to: DickBrisket

You might be onto something, a resident guardian of the official narrative is one of your first post responders,no it couldn't have anything to do with the UN arms treaty Obama has before the senate which could circumvent the second amendment could it??....LOOK LOOK THERES A RUSSIAN IN THE BUSHES.

a reply to: DickBrisket

The shooter visited the Anchorage Alaska FBI Field Office last November making claims the U.S. Intelligence HAD "Infiltrated his mind" and forced him to watch ISIS Propaganda Videos.

Quite Interesting as this area is riddled with post-HAARP ultra-low frequency experiments. Was stationed up at Elmendorf AFB from 1995-1999. Super weird business going on up there. All I can say.

What the hell is that?!

Did you mix your own commentary in with your quote from a news agency?

???

a reply to: Dan00

Yes. Yes they did. And HAARP? Really? *sigh*

A better question is why did the FBI not detain him then, and either get him help or locked up? Do they not know how to vet someone properly? Then why is our government saying nothing is wrong with our vetting process for muslim immigrants? That alone is enough to raise some red flags and wonder why the hell our National Security cannot do their jobs very well.

a reply to: 3daysgone

That's right.

And I don't know why.

originally posted by: 3daysgone
A better question is why did the FBI not detain him then, and either get him help or locked up? Do they not know how to vet someone properly? Then why is our government saying nothing is wrong with our vetting process for muslim immigrants? That alone is enough to raise some red flags and wonder why the hell our National Security cannot do their jobs very well.

What does this incident have to do with vetting Muslim immigrants? Take your political baiting elsewhere.

The news is reporting that this guy was hearing voices.

The guy more than likely has been exhibiting symptoms of schizophrenia for some time. Seems that men in their twenties can begin to show symptoms of the disease. And it all culminated into this.

It's really messed up.

Well well well...didn't see that plot twist coming. Isn't that interesting...I wonder what they're up to now. We shall see.

He shouldn't have been "detained" upon any other premise but that he presented with a mental illness.

The problem is, that folks with what he has usually need to present themselves for help, the FBI is not warranted to "detain" someone based on what Esteban presented.

There would have to be a recording somehow of what he presented when he visited the FBI, and some other professional would have had to examine the recording (which could be flagged based on keywords) to determine whether or not help could have been offered to, or compulsory, for poor Steve.

Wow, this interesting news is quickly getting shut down, as expected.

originally posted by: 3daysgone
A better question is why did the FBI not detain him then, and either get him help or locked up? Do they not know how to vet someone properly? Then why is our government saying nothing is wrong with our vetting process for muslim immigrants? That alone is enough to raise some red flags and wonder why the hell our National Security cannot do their jobs very well.

MSM says he sought mental health.Help for him was dismissed. Another one to fall through the cracks or used for an agenda due to that?

There is court docs being shared on him(not sure if I can share here) sharing his anger issues(domestic violence) for example.
One source
The source also mentions he was investigated for child porn but due to non evidence it was dismissed. Weapons were siezed then as by a CBS report.

a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Because the left is saying nothing is wrong with the vetting process. Because this was an act of terrorism no matter how you look at it. If they could not know that something was wrong with this guy, that diminishes this nations faith in their training and questions their agenda. What specifically made me think of the muslim immigrants was the fact that he mentioned ISIS, which has been rumored to use the immigrant situation to infiltrate nations.

There is no baiting here. But you sure did bite, and I would like to inform you that this is not a safe space. Maybe turn off the computer, go get some crayons, and possibly pet a dog or two. You will run into things from time to time that you disagree with, but you do not tell me what to say on any platform that I may stand.

a reply to: dreamingawake

Wow. Now that is a very beneficial post. Thank you. Why would you let someone slip through the crack that even mentions ISIS? Very interesting indeed.

originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Because the left is saying nothing is wrong with the vetting process. Because this was an act of terrorism no matter how you look at it. If they could not know that something was wrong with this guy, that diminishes this nations faith in their training and questions their agenda.

Again, this has nothing to do with vetting immigrants. And just because something is 'wrong' with somebody, does not give the FBI or anyone else the authority to detain them. Being mentally ill is not a crime. Had he done something criminal when he walked into the FBI field office, he would have been arrested.

You will run into things from time to time that you disagree with, but you do not tell me what to say on any platform that I may stand.

Cool it, Spartacus.

originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: AdmireTheDistance

Because the left is saying nothing is wrong with the vetting process. Because this was an act of terrorism no matter how you look at it. If they could not know that something was wrong with this guy, that diminishes this nations faith in their training and questions their agenda. What specifically made me think of the muslim immigrants was the fact that he mentioned ISIS, which has been rumored to use the immigrant situation to infiltrate nations.

There is no baiting here. But you sure did bite, and I would like to inform you that this is not a safe space. Maybe turn off the computer, go get some crayons, and possibly pet a dog or two. You will run into things from time to time that you disagree with, but you do not tell me what to say on any platform that I may stand.

I agree about terrorism. The BSO deemed it as such. So, no matter if he was associated with ISIS or not, it's an act of terrorism, this possibly just case domestic terrorism. As you can see by my other reply, he had some major issues that were not dealt with, one was anger.