It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: tony9802
By "carried the gun on the plane" they mean it was in his checked baggage. He picked up the bag, went to the bathroom to remove the gun, went out and started shooting. That's how I read it.
makes more sense if he went to the bathroom and collected the gun...
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: tony9802
originally posted by: TheBulk
WARNING GRAPHIC: www.liveleak.com...
In the video, he has taken shots at passengers collecting luggage..but the report states that he had carried the gun on the plain and that it was upon exiting the bathroom of the plane that he began shooting.. so what is it, he was shooting on the plain or shooting at the baggage claim terminal?
It's all unclear.
Apparently Air Canada have just stated that there is no record of him in their passenger lists and no checked guns on inbound flights to FtL that day.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: EchoesInTime
It would explaing the "jewish" comment.
Just speculating.
He's bug# crazy is yet another one. And I'd say it's in the pole position at the moment.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: tony9802
I've seen them at just about every airport I've been to. There's usually at least one bathroom for every two or three claim areas. Honolulu, where I worked for years, had one set of bathrooms in just about ever claim area.
A photograph of a well-dressed black man holding a baby is reportedly of George Zimmerman's great-grandfather - and could become a crucial piece of evidence in his murder trial.
CNN aired the picture last night and if its authenticity can be verified then it supports what the accused murderer's family have been saying since the shooting took place - that Zimmerman is from a mixed-race family and did not kill Trayvon Martin because he was black. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... Fo
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: EvillerBob
originally posted by: tony9802
originally posted by: TheBulk
WARNING GRAPHIC: www.liveleak.com...
In the video, he has taken shots at passengers collecting luggage..but the report states that he had carried the gun on the plain and that it was upon exiting the bathroom of the plane that he began shooting.. so what is it, he was shooting on the plain or shooting at the baggage claim terminal?
It's all unclear.
Apparently Air Canada have just stated that there is no record of him in their passenger lists and no checked guns on inbound flights to FtL that day.
Could be an accomplice was the passenger and this guy knew what suitcase to find.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: tony9802
By "carried the gun on the plane" they mean it was in his checked baggage. He picked up the bag, went to the bathroom to remove the gun, went out and started shooting. That's how I read it.
makes more sense if he went to the bathroom and collected the gun...
That was my first thought.
originally posted by: roadgravel
What's to say the gun was packed, not reported and security didn't see it if they scanned the luggage.
This is another thing that puzzles me. The Termnal 2 Baggage Claim area appears to be public access/pre-security. If so, that means the whole elaborate scheme of flying a firearm in/accomplices looking for particular bags etc would be pointless. Just walk through the public entrance and start shooting.
It just feels a bit, to borrow a phrase, "stupid-elaborate" in terms of a planned "terrorist" attack.
originally posted by: tony9802
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Soloprotocol
originally posted by: JimSmith
a reply to: tony9802
By "carried the gun on the plane" they mean it was in his checked baggage. He picked up the bag, went to the bathroom to remove the gun, went out and started shooting. That's how I read it.
makes more sense if he went to the bathroom and collected the gun...
That was my first thought.
So if that person with that name was never even on the flight, I suppose we can say that names are here being fabricated..so are we moving towards a false flag yet?
originally posted by: tony9802
Very scary..no one with that person's name on their passanger list..this is when the disturbing horror movie soundtrack starts setting in..