It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I, like all of you, love these new advances in technology but we are being misled into re-discovering the wheel, because the real truth about fusion would cause society to collapse.
We the peeps are ready for it, but we the oil-driven society isn't.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
THANK you for your work...I wish they had a civlian SCIENTIFIC branch ,like the military and equally as funded..SOMEONE needs to watchdog our country for facts not money or politics.
TOO INCLUDE MEDICAL(Talk about NEEDING scientific THEORY construction..)...but I'M weird...
originally posted by: TEOTWAWKIAIFF
a reply to: cavtrooper7
Man, would love to be a researcher for Lockheed! Get my grubby hands on their files and ready for prime time unpatented tech. I am certain they already have some of the stuff that is reported about today like 10 years (or longer!) ago. The field of metamaterials is amazing. And if it has anything to do with radar or visible light I'm certain LM already has "been there and done that" like they said back in the 1990s!
Like vvvvvv
phys.org, May 5, 2017 - Physicists demonstrate photonic hypercrystals for control of light-matter interaction.
Then I realized they had probably already done that. Then I sat down and it hit me. The world is about to change. Drastically change. Oil will soon die and what will replace it? Well, they just announced it! LM even gave a timeline.
the word "fusion" is being used. We are being conditioned so it wont surprise you when it happens.
From my view point you are going to need "energy storage" and "more efficient" power lines before a fusion reactor comes on line (TEOT's best guess). Then you get full benefit of energy creation, distribution, and storage. Guess what else Lockheed is doing? Energy storage. Hum?
originally posted by: punkinworks10
a reply to: cavtrooper7
There will always be a market for gas fuels, and as the carbon burden of large scale generation is lifted by fusion, we will see blossoming of clean gas technologies.
My ex was the general contractor/chief engineer for an experimental fuel cell installation about 15 years ago. It runs on natural gas, I think it was built by Mitsubishi, for sure a japanese firm. It's foot print is similar to that of the proposed fusion plant.
She is a ME, and was working for a mechanical contractor at the time, they got the job for the install at a 1920's office building restoration.
It supplies hot and cold water and all the electricity that the 15 floor building, plus the whole block of buildings its on, and still have an excess to sell back on to the grid.
The hot and cold water provide not only running water but heating and cooling as well.
The natural gas is catalytically cracked before the fuel cell itself
Carbon and another solid by product are periodically collected.
And one thing we are starting to see in the natural gas fields here is well head generation. There is a small gas turbine generator at each well head, and it just so happens that these old gas fields lie beneath several of the states major hi tension lines. You find new well heads clustered near transformer stations, where there is a minimum distance of wire to be laid to hook into the grid.
I think the real future in energy is diversification, the fusion plant wont be right for every economy or location or application, but it will take over for the giant fossil fuel power plants, as Teot has mentioned , all you do to convert is change the heat source.
But for that small community in remote alaska, or the congo, only accessable by air or water, a fusion plant weighing even 200 tons would not be practical to install in a remote location.
But,if they lie over or near a gas field, they can utilize well head generation, those can be flown in by heli.
And like fusion you would put generation as close to use, to minimize transmision loss and transmision network upkeep.
Even as cool as fusion is I still think complete diversification is the future, unless we make progress into the realm of serious sci fi.
Our portion of the universe is awash in energy, its just a matter of capturing it.
Wind, waves, solar, hydro, geo-thermal, geo-electrical can all be taken advantage of.
Teot, you mentioned storage technologies need addresses to make the most of fusion, I absolutely agree. And so many new storage techniques; thermal, kinetic, electrical and electro-chemical.
In last few months I have seen papers on liquid salt and liquid metal thermal storage techniques that have proven quite effcient. There has been talk in the av forum of solid heat storage and heat transfer technologies possibly used in black aircraft.
A solid heat sink that can absorb a tremendous amount of heat, yet still be cool to the touch. When the material has reached saturation, it will store that energy like a heat battery. Discharge is then electricly initiated at a later time.
Imagine capturing even more of the heat energy of the fusion reactor, and storing it as heat. Along with generating electricity at the plant, you could run a heat battety recharge service.
You use your heat battery to run a small closed loop super critical fluid turbine generator.
And imagine if the rumors of direct heat to electricity are true, and you what they are somewhat true.
That is the significance of that new photo voltaic material that generates electricity from the infra red.
Eliminating the mechanical cycle makes things so much simpler.
But for that small community in remote alaska, or the congo, only accessable by air or water, a fusion plant weighing even 200 tons would not be practical to install in a remote location.
But,if they lie over or near a gas field, they can utilize well head generation, those can be flown in by heli.