It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes global hawk would be the last addition to this set : )
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Practice makes perfect. Looks like they are trying to get a full set. All they are lacking is a global hawk. You'd think there could be a self destruct procedure or something. On a lighter note, it's not like they can use them against us.
American military drones. Gotta catch 'em all
a reply to: haman10
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
well if they are able to figure out how to jam it's signal and capture it, i would say they can figure out how to control it.
originally posted by: Woodcarver
Practice makes perfect. Looks like they are trying to get a full set. All they are lacking is a global hawk. You'd think there could be a self destruct procedure or something. On a lighter note, it's not like they can use them against us.
American military drones. Gotta catch 'em all
a reply to: haman10
A second senior U.S. military official said that a major question is how the drone could have remained "virtually intact," given the high altitude from which it is said to have crashed. U.S. Navy Captain John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, told a news conference on 8 December 2011 that Pentagon analysts were examining the video.[24] Both Kirby and fellow spokesman George Little would not comment further on whether the U.S. military believed the drone was the one missing, both did say that the missing drone had not been recovered.[24] Later that day, CBS reported that the US officials had confirmed in private the authenticity of the drone shown by the Iranians.[25]
US acknowledgement
I for one? I think we are "letting" them get their hands on them...that way they spend time breaking them down to see how they work...while all the time...we have the higher tech ones up there flying around...
RQ-170 was THE most advanced UAV US had in her arsenal . by all means continue "letting" Iran get her hands on these "conventional" technologies .
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: haman10
Interesting (but not unexpected) there's basically no mention of this across the media. Surprise surprise.
I have to think that because of the ease this is happening...the U.S. (and Allies)...have got others more advanced as well out there. They'd have to...or it'd be like losing a war.
I for one? I think we are "letting" them get their hands on them...that way they spend time breaking them down to see how they work...while all the time...we have the higher tech ones up there flying around...
"Broke down" . literally tens of US drones have "broken down" over Iran without having a scratch on them .
originally posted by: paraphi
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
well if they are able to figure out how to jam it's signal and capture it, i would say they can figure out how to control it.
Maybe they did, maybe they did not. Maybe it just broke down.
TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's Revolutionary Guard has built a new attack drone which is similar to a U.S. unmanned aerial vehicle captured five years ago, Iranian media reported on Saturday.
The semi-official Tasnim news agency says the "Saegheh" (Thunderbolt) drone is similar to the RQ-170 Sentinel spy drone. Iran's state-run Press TV says the long-range drone can carry four precision-guided bombs. Neither report gave figures for the drone's range.