Man charged with Assualt on a female

I wasn't aware of this Assualt on a woman precedent, It was always "assault" period.

Here's the link, if someone could embed the video so I can add it to the OP it would be greatly appreciated.
www.latimes.com...

ASHEVILLE - Shirley Teter participated in protests during some of the most controversial and conflict-ridden times in our nation's history. But she said she was shocked at her experience at Monday's Donald Trump rally that ended with the 69-year-old being punched by a South Carolina man, police say

IMO this was very shameless, I'm not saying I in anyway whatsoever condone an act of this nature. and with that being said

Why is an attack on a female charged differently than an attack on a male?

I thought these Social Justice issues were about equal rights. This is a very slippery slope to attach female to it. Next it will be assault on a "transgender" or assault on a "black man", a "jew", simply labeling every assault as a hate crime which is not so.

Also let me state that no one should ever punch anyone in the face over different opinions or views,

It's part of VAWA, or Violence Against Women Act. This law was passed by feminazis who feel women are equal or superior to men but, apparently need special protections...

a reply to: AtheAlmightyOne

Special protection for the weaker sex. Only possible reason, but even as that I'm not sure...

From your source:

Buncombe County Republican Chairman Nathan West said protesters at first were restrained and respectful. But as the doors opened and the number of protesters grew to about 75-100, they pressed close to supporters entering the center and some screamed and cursed at event-goers, calling them "racists" and "Nazis."

"I saw one dust-up where a protester bumped into a younger man and things escalated momentarily but was quickly resolved as other supporters grabbed the young man and pulled him back and (Asheville police) arrived within seconds," West said.

So 7000+ people being called racists, nazis, and I'm sure many other deplorable things and 1 incident happened. There are crazies in every crowd.

originally posted by: AtheAlmightyOne
It's part of VAWA, or Violence Against Women Act. This law was passed by feminazis who feel women are equal or superior to men but, apparently need special protections...

Women are equal to men in every way except size and strength though right?

I hate the term feminazi because I believe it was first introduced by that dimwit Rush Limbaugh.

That whole thing sounds to convenient for the DNC. I wonder if the DNC told the guy to pretend to be a trumpe supporter and go smack some old lady and they would pay off his house. DNC isn't underhanded though.....right?

Assault should be assault. Just shows you how powerful special interest groups can be.

a reply to: Orionx2

I was thinking the same to be honest, but no way to prove it. They rigged the primaries already against Bernie. I wouldn't put anything past the DNC. Bunch of scumbags!

a reply to: ssenerawa
Here is a video leading up to the incident. The Trump supporters had to go through a hostile crowd of protesters to get into the event.
The accused elderly man and his wife were making their way through this crowd when according to the accused man the lady who is the supposed victim grabbed the man on the shoulder and he turned around and she got knocked to the ground.

The cops should have had more control of the protesters, and I think this lady is exaggerating to smear Trump.
Wouldn't be the first time.
Here is a video of the supposed victim talking about it. Does it look like she got "cold cocked"?

Here is an article at Breitbart of the accused man saying the lady made the whole thing up.

Richard L. Campbell, the man accused of sucker-punching a 69-year-old protester outside a Donald Trump rally in Asheville, NC on Monday, is vigorously denying the charge — and has video that his attorney says proves his innocence.

Because it is quite obvious that we are not equal in relative terms, but the law will make it so!!

a reply to: ssenerawa

North Carolina legislature views a grown adult male assaulting a female of any age as more serious than two grown men throwing punches at each other.

The law was upheld during an appeal case in 1979, and supposedly goes all the way back to 1911.

Your slippery slope argument seems to be a touch off the mark, unless your contention is that social justice warriors were running the North Carolina legislature in at least as far back as 1979 and potentially as far back as 1911, I would say the slope isn't that slippery at all.

a reply to: ssenerawa

I read nowhere about the specific charge "Assualt on a woman". Crazy woman was probably paid to be an agitator anyways. Why is the video focused on her until the alleged "moment of impact". I am trying to find the actual warrant and/or arrest information from the local government.


so Upon browsing the city's recent arrests, it appears assault on a female is a valid existing charge. However, I found it against other named persons, and not yet for Mr Campbell. Thus far. Also:

How to check on a warrant

To check on warrants that were taken out against you, or warrants that you have taken out on another person, you must contact the Buncombe County Magistrates Office located in the Buncombe County Court House. This must be done in person.

Right, inquire about your warrant in person an then get arrested on site. How wonderful.
a reply to: stosh64

Ms. Teeter, in spite of her claim of injuries, was later photographed at the rally smiling with other protestors. www.facebook.com...
She does appear to have a bandage to her left elbow where she fell. Multiple video and photographic evidence of Ms. Teeter’s face the following day show no bruising or other trauma to Ms. Teeter despite her claim that she was “punched in the jaw”. Photographs of Mr. Campbell’s hands also so no sign of trauma. As Mr. Campbell is on blood thinner, he bruises easily and with little pressure applied.
Breitbart

a reply to: amazing

I find the term femi nazi a rather accurate description of certain females who despise males but demand special treatment
and priviliges

originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: ssenerawa
Here is a video leading up to the incident. The Trump supporters had to go through a hostile crowd of protesters to get into the event.
The accused elderly man and his wife were making their way through this crowd when according to the accused man the lady who is the supposed victim grabbed the man on the shoulder and he turned around and she got knocked to the ground.

The cops should have had more control of the protesters, and I think this lady is exaggerating to smear Trump.
Wouldn't be the first time.
Here is a video of the supposed victim talking about it. Does it look like she got "cold cocked"?

Here is an article at Breitbart of the accused man saying the lady made the whole thing up.

Richard L. Campbell, the man accused of sucker-punching a 69-year-old protester outside a Donald Trump rally in Asheville, NC on Monday, is vigorously denying the charge — and has video that his attorney says proves his innocence.

Yes I agree, but isn't it usually just assault. Not Assualt on a woman? I could be totally wrong I just wasn't aware

a reply to: worldstarcountry

The reporter stated the charges in a ABC news video he said the police stated they issued a warrant not for assault but for assault on a female 1:55 m.worldstarhiphop.com...

a reply to: ssenerawa

I found it in writing finally. They make it difficult to isolate though when looking.

AN ACT to create the offense of aggravated assault on a female.

The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:

SECTION 1. Chapter 14 of the General Statutes is amended by adding a new section to read:

"§ 14-34.7A. Aggravated assault on a female.

Unless covered under some other provision of law providing greater punishment, any male person, who is at least 18 years of age, that assaults a female person and inflicts serious injury shall be guilty of a Class F felony."

SECTION 2. This act becomes effective December 1, 2005, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.

Is there a way to challenge the constitutionality of this law? Obviously it is dishonorable for a man to smack around a female. But to codify it into law as having a worse penalty based only on sex, well does that not defeat the purpose of equality under law??

originally posted by: ssenerawa
I wasn't aware of this Assualt on a woman precedent, It was always "assault" period.

Here's the link, if someone could embed the video so I can add it to the OP it would be greatly appreciated.
www.latimes.com...

ASHEVILLE - Shirley Teter participated in protests during some of the most controversial and conflict-ridden times in our nation's history. But she said she was shocked at her experience at Monday's Donald Trump rally that ended with the 69-year-old being punched by a South Carolina man, police say

IMO this was very shameless, I'm not saying I in anyway whatsoever condone an act of this nature. and with that being said

Why is an attack on a female charged differently than an attack on a male?

I thought these Social Justice issues were about equal rights. This is a very slippery slope to attach female to it. Next it will be assault on a "transgender" or assault on a "black man", a "jew", simply labeling every assault as a hate crime which is not so.

Also let me state that no one should ever punch anyone in the face over different opinions or views,

Actually it was a 69 year old lady that happenened to have fallen onto her oxygen tank after being decked by a Chump supporter. And I'm no Hillary supporter so save the drivel. She happenened to be a White lady and the coward that pulled that s#!t should have his punk ass handed to him on a platter. My mother is that age. I would have went bat guano crazy on his ass and engaged something fierce. No weaponry. Personal...would have had to put hands on him.

A poster on the www.msn.com website said that he saw the video of the incident and nobody punched her; someone brushed up against her and knocked her over. I have not seen video of the incident so I can't say who is telling the truth. But I can say I see no visible evidence on Shirley Teter's face that someone punched her.

Sal

a reply to: ssenerawa

a reply to: worldstarcountry

Chalk that up to ineptness with Google. Searching for North Carolina assault on a female law brings up literally dozens of websites and articles about the specific charge, including the code section.

The law has been challenged. No challenge has been successful.

ETA - you're not even citing the right portion of code. That's aggravated assault on a female, which is a felony. The crime in the OP is simple assault, or misdemeanor assault.

www.ncleg.net...

This is North Carolina folks.. Remember this is the place where they have long debates and fights about which "potty" is the correct one.. Something like this would be like Chinese math...

I'm betting We could put it 'out there' that this is "Edith Wagner, a well known crisis actor..." and someone would run with it and then the opposing voice would be called a dolt or worse...


Does a Bear snip in North Carolina???

a reply to: JimiBlack

Headline only I am guessing?? The video where the agitator approaches the elderly vision impaired man from behind just happens to conveniently drop out of view when the allegation of "battery by way of punch to the jaw" occurs the moment she places her unwarranted physical contact on him during a vulnerable state. However, she is all smiles with no visible injuries, nor was she treated for any serious injuries at the hospital. The only injury she was treated for was the scrape of her elbow for which she was provided a band aid.

I am leveling accusations here that she and the cameraman who dropped it right as she made unwarranted physical contact with the vulnerable elderly man were working together on behalf of the Dem party to setup a media circus. This is also evident when she asks the question during an interview "She asks if people find a Trump supporter punching her in the face deplorable." This was a complete setup to try and legitimize Clinton's slanderous remarks.

The only video evidence presented in fact shows that this woman was the only one to make physical contact with 73 year old Richard L. Campbell who also suffers from cataracts. He was reported to have no trauma on his knuckles, which would be clear as Mr. Campbell is on blood thinner, he bruises easily and with little pressure applied.

This scammer of a woman threw herself to the ground and started putting on a good act typical of a con artist in an effort to legitimize Hillary's claims of "deplorables" . I pray that when Mr Campbell wins the lawsuit, which he welcomes with open arms, that this woman is subsequently charged with Filing a False Police Report.

a reply to: Shamrock6

Thank you for that. This was exactly what I was looking for. I just posted the first search result from the NC legislative assembly website. I don't use google, I DuckDuckGo, so maybe that was what happened. I still feel it should continue to be challenged on constitutionality basis.