Study concludes explosives used on 911

a reply to: cavtrooper7

Nuclear weapons technology is really further ahead than most think. Just my two cents.

As I'Ve said for many years now, people who buy the # storm of lies that is the OS. Won't be able to believe it forever. Our gov. Will taunt us with the truth.

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: DimensionalChange03

It's already a known fact

BB18 Littelfuse Manufatcurer information

These are pictures within the world trade center prior to the attacks. Remember the falling man?

Full Story


This has been known yet ignored for a long time.

Littelfuse makes electrical fuses and breakers. So much for that....

www.littelfuse.com...

originally posted by: tadaman
unless a micro nuke was used underground.

The bathtub was not damaged, and how did a nuke underground start the collapses where the planes hit?

a reply to: tadaman

If anything a theromobaric.
Nukes ,even neutron systems leave a signature,not to mention why risk a very potent weapon on a "Northwoods" psyop?
THEY wouldn't need that and the complications of drawing it from any magazine.

a reply to: cavtrooper7

custom built, to core out the buildings.

With a unique signature from a classified and dead weapons program no one will ever hear about.

Ghost weapon....

a reply to: hellobruce

The blast was directed upwards with a particular fission chamber designed to that end.

Bathtub? There was molten metal for days...

again just my 2 cents.

a reply to: nOraKat

As the building floors above collapse the air displaced is forced down - like floors acting like piston in cylinder

The displaced air forced down will blow the windows out

Seen it happen in college - bunch of engineering students calculated could blew out picture window at end of
floor by slamming doors along hallway in sequence

Worked on it all semester until got it right - blew that sucker clean out of the frame

Administration was less than impressed.......

a reply to: DimensionalChange03

Yes, and this evidence will unfortunately, and probably be ignored in the short term, just like similar data from AE911. But, it is an important study. There are now not one, but two major studies, which we can point to as major pieces of evidence, which proves fairly conclusively that the offical story is a lie.

The painful truth to the pro-offical story crowd is that the jig is up, a growing percentage knows that lies have been showed upon us, without a review of the evidence, and like an arranged chorus from the MSM. Yep, the truth wins in the end! It's merely a matter of time, and how much of it remains until the bubble bursts.

custom built, to core out the buildings.

a reply to: tadaman

Core out the building ?? - you are aware that there were 20 survivors INSIDE THE BUILDINGS after the collapse

14 in stairway B of North Tower (12 FDNY, 1 Port Authority Police, 1 civilian) , 2 Port Authority workers were in stairway
as building collapsed - one was ejected to wake up on rubble pile suffering only broken ankle, other was trapped in debris until following morning. Several more survived collapse, but were trapped in rubble and died of their injuries before
rescuers could reach them.

In South tower 2 Port Authority Police were recovered from destroyed elevator shaft - again several more survived
initial collapse of building, only to be buried by rubble during subsequent collapses

Then they were the 2 people who were trapped in underground concourse and were able to get out

So if buildings were "Cored OUT" why all the survivors ....??

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

like tritium? People had hanging skin. Many first responders have died of all sorts of BS typical with high radiation exposure.

Name the ones that died within hours. Civilians would have died in hours. Yes radiation is a toxin to the body. Many toxins are going to produce the same symptoms. Sailors on sailing ships use to loose teeth and have open sores from not radiation sickness, but vitamin deficiencies.

If a nuke was used at the WTC:

One, large amounts of civilians and first responders would have died with in hours.

Two, large amounts of civilians and first responders would have started dying in days or have radiation burns.

Three, anywhere people dying from long term radiation poisoning should be contaminated. Their cars, their homes, the hospitals, the places they had lunch everyday.

Sorry that conspiracists use lack of understanding of radiation and fool people into thinking a nuke was used.

a reply to: firerescue

That doesnt negate the posibillity.

It just means that in my scenario, a low yield nuclear weapon with a specialized fission chamber for demolitions, like in a SADM,

caused an upward blast of directed energy, which damaged the internal support structures.....and these people were not in the center of the buildings, rather on the outside peripherals.

A weapon that is completely useless for war...and as such was abandoned by our military but continued its use as an ace up the sleave for some.

Were these people in the center of the building?

I dont think they were.

a reply to: neutronflux

you are thinking about a traditional nuclear weapon. Yes that would be true.

Given that this is all superficial knowledge of nuclear weapons and current capabilities....ON BOTH OUR PARTS.....I will leave it at that.

Dont cite expertise.

The OS is BS.

a reply to:

Gentlemen, this is as bad as Arlen Specter's one bullet theory.
03557">flatbush71

You are aware that conspiracy theory arose because fools mis aligned positions of JFK and Connelly in the car

When properly positioned bullet follows path exactly as laid out by Warren Commission said

DISCOVERY CHANNEL performed experiment to see if could replicate trajectory of bullet -- used anatomical dummies
of same size as JFK/Connelly, dressed them in same style suits, positioned them exactly as were that date and had
sniper fire same model rifle using ammunition from same lot

Were able to demonstrate trajectory of bullet matched ......

Most conspiracy theories arise because fools "get it wrong:, because of deliberate falsification, ignorance or
incompetence......

a reply to: firerescue

doesnt answer why he was killed and who did the paying.

So.......We still have an assasinated president that was killed by unknown powers...

Who cares about bullets and crap. That could have been all a ruse to divert attention.

WHO KILLED OUR PRESIDENT?

originally posted by: Jchristopher5
a reply to: DimensionalChange03

Yes, and this evidence will unfortunately, and probably be ignored in the short term, just like similar data from AE911. But, it is an important study. There are now not one, but two major studies, which we can point to as major pieces of evidence, which proves fairly conclusively that the offical story is a lie.

The painful truth to the pro-offical story crowd is that the jig is up, a growing percentage knows that lies have been showed upon us, without a review of the evidence, and like an arranged chorus from the MSM. Yep, the truth wins in the end! It's merely a matter of time, and how much of it remains until the bubble bursts.

Sorry, but it's conspiracists that use pseudoscience and ignorance to push false narratives.

Which truth is it. Classic controlled demolition, thermite, quite bombs, lasers and holograms, jet drones, nukes, missiles and holograms, dustification.

Funny how the conspiracists disprove each other? And how the narratives are not consistent among conspiracists for getting to the one truth. In fact, the conspiracist movement keeps diminishing in number and keeps separating into different truths. They are farther from a consensus than ever.

Sorry you can comprehend and makes you afraid the United States of America cannot control everyone and things like 911 happen.

The only conspiracy was the US government let it's guard down and inside persons let the terrorists in. Conspiracists have no credible or physical evidence otherwise.

a reply to: neutronflux

You feel very strongly about this. And you feel very adversly about "conspiracists".....on a conspiracy site.

Makes me want to look deeper.

You use this and that idea thrown around, some by intelligence to discredit all asociated like the bullet crap was with Kennedy....

How about, we dont believe a government known to lie and do outright crazy shait to its own people.

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

you are thinking about a traditional nuclear weapon. Yes that would be true.

Given that this is all superficial knowledge of nuclear weapons and current capabilities....ON BOTH OUR PARTS.....I will leave it at that.

Dont cite expertise.

The OS is BS.

Then prove it can happen otherwise. If it's nuclear, and it's based on fission, it's going to make fission products. It's going to release radiation.

Name what isotope in your imagined weapon.

a reply to: neutronflux

LOL

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: neutronflux

You feel very strongly about this. And you feel very adversly about "conspuracists".....on a conspiracy site.

Makes me want to look deeper.

Sorry, but how much UFO sightings are false or misunderstood. How many times have Bigfoot hunters have faked evidence.

Conspiracists have Steven Jones who produces experiments that the results cannot be reproduced and publishes BS papers. Or Dr Wood who has gone to great lengths to disprove controlled demolitions and believes in dustification. Know the one thing in common, they make a living off conspiracists.