It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Nukes? We are missing important possibilities...

page: 1

log in


posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:00 PM
So many threads are started and analyzed saying and overusing NUKE, NUKES, NUKES. Its as though the younger generation (say 50 and younger) think thats the only way to cause mass casualties, when in fact its not. The world doesnt need nukes and mutual country to country, continent to continent mass destruction to kill off the entire populace world-wide.

In disaster response...I train for radiological, biological, environmental and chemical disasters. Many are far more insideous started with no one even knowing they have begun. Germs and disease take longer of course, but in WWW 111, that could be the real weapon. What better way to kill everyone and everything living...and still keep all the buildings, bridges, waterways, infrastructure totally intact for the "bad-guys" to use them after digging the mass graves for the rest of us?

Most threads always talk of this country's nukes, and that country's intercontinental nukes, submarine nukes, briefcase and football sized nukes. Really? A few small test tubes of biohazard substances released in multple countries at the same time, could kill off a huge majority of the population. Just look at the subway release of Sarin in Japan a few years ago.

Breathe it? Touch it? Done. And some could be spread in restaurant buffets. Eat some, and you and your kids go home. You to work and all your co-workers, the kids to school and all their classmates..and they go home to their parents, and they go to work and expose their co-workers who go home to their kids...who go to school etc, etc, etc.

Nukes? Huge destruction area to area. But to wipe out 99% of the world? I'd be waaaay more afraid of germ warfare and emp's that destroy all communications..that may lead to simply us killing our own neighbors. And with all buildings and roads and houses left intact...the enemy(s) can move right in.

We need to stop addressing the world as we know it and its end by nukes only. I think thats the least of all the ways to worry about.*

*I will be leaving this thread to discussion, and not commenting much. But, I did want us all to realize...though a massive worldwide strike is may not be nukes at all. We need to start addressing those other destruction methods.

Advanced Disaster Life Support

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:05 PM
a reply to: mysterioustranger

All you need is a few highly contagious people in an airport that are in the stages of zero symptoms and you literally have biological warfare.

I'd prefer nukes tbh.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:20 PM
What about the insidious neutron bomb? It would leave most of the infrastructure intact. You are right though about chemical and biological weapons, they are pretty sick them selves... I think if there's some kind of occult agenda to discredit religion they would probably use nukes. The "son/sun" of God/government. The return of the sun to take us to heaven.. Sun worship. I think they would use nukes but who knows what else they could use afterwards... in the camps so to speak.

and then theres zika...
edit on 28-8-2016 by AnonymousTi because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:24 PM
a reply to: mysterioustranger

Yes. I agree with that. Most people are quite blind when it comes to warfare. And one small detail here... you cannot detonate nuke any-time, anywhere, it needs geomagnetism and solar positioning calibration. The whole Nuke thing is quite metaphysical indeed, that's why is not the best tool for the economic wars we are experiencing. If it was all about obliteration, yes it is the father of weapons, but that is quite not the goal of any world war, past or future.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:30 PM
a reply to: 5enign4gent

you cannot detonate nuke any-time, anywhere, it needs geomagnetism and solar positioning calibration

Um... no, you simply just need the energy to make the core reach critical mass, no solar alignments needed.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:32 PM
a reply to: mysterioustranger

You of course address a Bioweapon?
MAYBE one that is Mycoplasmic and injectable?
I think that horse LEFT that stable in 90,and MY name is Specialist infector.
NEVER mind finding a legitimate TEST for a disorder like that if you're POOR.
God knows the VA won't agree to test for it,so HERE we are
Mine has become Mycoplasma pneumonia I think because it is causing COPD.
How do I know? Because a VA test came back Mycoplasma incognitus from the Mayo clinic and they ignore it, when I asked they said "This was just a term when they DON'T know what it is"
AS we speak all across America,fatigue and forgetfulness is spreading.
IT NEVER used to be like this at all.

edit on 28-8-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

edit on 28-8-2016 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:38 PM
a reply to: cavtrooper7

Sounds like you might be on to something there... Interesting that they ignore it... trying to avoid being sued maybe..

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 12:50 PM
Yeah, I realized that when ebola was going crazy. What if ebola were weaponized to spread via air and be even more lethal?? It would have been unstoppable.

Not to mention, you have the ability to design biological weapons that kill everyone but your own people. I guess the USA couldn't do something like that because we're too diverse but many much more racially pure countries could.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 01:06 PM
a reply to: AnonymousTi

No it would KILL their budget THEY HAVE to short change vets or they would go under rather quickly.
Most of SJW America wants combat vets dead anyway and THAT is the attitude of the regime right now.
We KNOW we are expendable in war THAT'S the job,I also know the world is NOT at all EVER going to be fair.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 02:05 PM
Nukes get more attention because of the pretty colors.

But you're not bringing anything new to the table here. This has been discussed many many times.

My favorite :
Admittedly not the best source one could hope for but it wouldn't surprise me at all.

Good old cold war ingenuity. Ebola-Pox

"Russia has researched the genetic alteration of smallpox," Alibek told me. "In 1990 and 1991, we engineered a smallpox at Vector. It was found that several areas of the smallpox genome" -- the DNA -- "can be used for the introduction of some foreign genetic material. The first development was smallpox and VEE. VEE, or Venezuelan equine encephalitis, is a brain virus. It causes a severe headache and near-coma, but it is generally not lethal. Alibek said that the researchers spliced VEE into smallpox. The result was a recombinant chimera virus. In ancient Greek myth, the chimera was a monster made from parts of different animals. Recombination means the mixing of genes from different organisms. "It is called smallpox-VEE chimera," Alibek said. It could also be called Veepox. Under a microscope, Alibek said, the Veepox looks like smallpox, but it isn't.

More recently, Alibek claims, the Vector researchers may have created a recombinant Ebola-smallpox chimera. One could call it Ebolapox. Ebola virus uses the molecule RNA for its genetic code, whereas smallpox uses DNA. Alibek believes that the Russian researchers made a DNA copy of the disease-causing parts of Ebola, then grafted them into smallpox. Alibek said he thinks that the Ebolapox virus is stable -- that is, that it will replicate successfully in a test tube or in animals -- which means that, once created, Ebolapox will live forever in a laboratory, and will not uncreate itself. Thus a new form of life may have been brought into the world.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 02:10 PM
a reply to: watchitburn

Dude.. Ebolapox? that is a frightening prospect Lol man some of the things they come up with... Always learning something new on here

edit on 28-8-2016 by AnonymousTi because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 03:01 PM
Scary stuff here...

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 06:02 PM
Quantum Bubble. The US doesn't need nukes, we only used them as contingency, we have better tech now. QE can remote detonate nuclear explosions with just a computer, and no physical bomb. The Quantum Bubble is more destructive than a black hole and takes low energy to produce. If anyone starts nuking anyone, especially the USA, we all die.

posted on Aug, 28 2016 @ 06:50 PM
I'll poke you with a sharp stick.
All 7 billion of ya.

posted on Sep, 5 2016 @ 09:22 AM
To be honest, it's great info and does show how broad the spectrum of mass annihilation can be. But I'd say keep the world ignorant about it because while it is in the back of a mind, not many embrace the idea of it over the use of Nukes. Although there's a strict ban on chemical warfare bringing this to the forefront of a radical's mind could have grave consequences.

And I guess nukes get more attention because it potentially ensures nothing survives due to the 'nuclear winter'.

posted on Sep, 15 2016 @ 08:34 PM
Yes, we are missing artificially induced cold. Among germ warfare there is a series of artificial conditions created by the secret srevices that may at times resemble cold or some sort of sinusitis. These artificially induced conditions are created through different types of neurological manipulation of the immune system and bacteriological exposition.

The effect resembles a normal cold to better be camouflaged to doctors and other specialists. In reality they are manipulations of the secret services designed as a weapon of aggression and control by the EU.

posted on Sep, 15 2016 @ 08:41 PM
Bio-weapons are chancy. They can turn on you as easily as those you use them against. Microorganisms are nothing if not adaptable and designed to survive.

Sure you might design something that you have a working treatment or cure for, but then you release it and all of a sudden it mutates into something you can't cure or treat effectively, or it finds a natural reservoir and hides out just waiting to change and strike.

top topics


log in