Newt Gingrich Says We Should ‘Test Every Person’ Of Muslim Descent

a reply to: pryed -eyed-one

There are different ways to fight the cowards that hide behind Islam. Like immediate death, publically televised after they are convicted.

Infringing on the rights of American citizens is something politicians and many ATS members want to do regardless. That needs to be stopped and spoken out against.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

Please don't waste my time. The topic is not firearms and background checks are not comparable to the persectution of people by religion.

It is the topic.

'TESTING' people is WRONG right ?

I'm not going to go off topic while you rant about the 2nd amendment. Considering your recent comments regarding the right, you are not in a position to claim you are pro-2nd, because you are not.

You believe in a religious test for the 2nd as well.

Newt's been on my top enemies list for 10 years. I wonder if for saying that I should be brought in for questioning?

I think we should test everyone and deport the Sharia law loons, the Christian nutters, the Commies, Hassids, the Socialists, Anarchists and basically anyone who is not a Libertarian.

See how that works?

a reply to: TruthxIsxInxThexMist

Again, why should Jews be allowed self governance according to their laws? Why do Christians think it's appropriate to legislate from the Bible and display the 10 Commandments? I mean, we already have laws, right?

a reply to: tinymind

The number of deaths is different. One is a fringe groups of psychos the other is a massive force of organized military strategists. Pretty different.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I think we should test everyone and deport the Sharia law loons, the Christian nutters, the Commies, Hassids, the Socialists, Anarchists and basically anyone who is not a Libertarian.

See how that works?

Exactly.

a reply to: introvert

It IS the topic.

TESTING is wrong, Only so far as muslims are concerned.

Everyone else ?

Doesn't matter.

You believe in a religious test for the 2nd as well.

Stop making snip up.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: neo96


No. Christians are not being persecuted in this country. 3/4's of the country identifies as Christian.

Christians are being persecuted.

They are being called bigots for believing in the things their Holy Book tells them.

They are being forced by law to act against their religious beliefs.

Previously, in North America, the society's civil laws were in harmony with the Christian faith.

So, it was easy to be a Christian, and have everybody think that you were "good".

Today, we're reverting to the attitudes found in the early days of Christianity, where Christians were practicing principles at odds with the general society, so were constantly being persecuted.

Today, it is "bad" to be a Christian. And "good" to be a non-conformer to the book. People keep telling Christians that their ideas are outdated, old fashioned, and bigoted. That God loves everybody, so sin is no longer an issue. The more you sin, the more God loves you. So, lets all go become bigger sinners. It's the fashion. God used to punish sinners long ago. But, not anymore. Today men are proud of their sins. It defines who they are, and who they want to be. Sin is being celebrated as the last great emancipation of mankind. Freedom from restraint. But, the interesting thing is that the bible prophisied that exactly this would happen;

[QUOTE]
"Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; " -- KJV, 2 Thessalonians 2:3
[END QUOTE]

Before the last day, there must be a "FALLING AWAY" from the laws of the scriptures.

And that the "MAN OF SIN" be publicly "REVEALED" to all. They take to the street and march with pride.

The Anglican Church of Canada has just voted to allow gay and lesbian marriage in the Church with full blessings from the priests. They no longer follow the holy book. Now the lay folk are voting for what they want, and telling the clergy what rules and principles the religion must have.

The people teach the priests today, what is religion.

Well, if the people already know the truth, why do they still need the church?

The end of the Church has come. Just as the bible says would happen.

Church today, is nothing but a social club, where people meet to discuss the new fashions in behavior.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I think we should test everyone and deport the Sharia law loons, the Christian nutters, the Commies, Hassids, the Socialists, Anarchists and basically anyone who is not a Libertarian.

See how that works?

To be fair, few members of those groups are committing atrocities and crimes against humanity with such a high frequency.

a reply to: neo96

It IS the topic. TESTING is wrong, Only so far as muslims are concerned. Everyone else ? Doesn't matter

What other religions are being "tested" and deported based on their beliefs?

This from one of the politicians that let 25 million illegal immigrants simply " walk across our Southern border". How in the world we gonna "vett' anyone at all with that damn border wide the hell open. It really boggles the mind that our Government is so concerned with terrorism when again I say it.....our southern border is a BIG GAPING hole in the wire. If all the illegals were "terrorist's", we would certainly be screwed.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

I think we should test everyone and deport the Sharia law loons, the Christian nutters, the Commies, Hassids, the Socialists, Anarchists and basically anyone who is not a Libertarian.

See how that works?

Sharia Law is man-made lunacy not divine revelation in any sense.

www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

All four of the “voluntary” court’s lawyers were unlicensed in the state of Texas, a third degree felony. Mayor Beth Van Duyne received several phone calls on the matter. It seems that the Islamic Tribunal not only was unlicensed, but they failed to notify the city of their illegal court being operated in city limits. She promised to get to the bottom of it, and she did. By their own website’s admission, if U.S. law conflicts with Sharia law, “we follow Sharia law.” It also openly admitted separate rules for men and women in their proceedings, discriminating and humiliating women which is against the U.S. Constitution. The Islamic Tribunal also openly declared that they hope [this] will “set a precedence that will be emulated and duplicated throughout the country.” via Mad World News Read more: www.thepoliticalinsider.com...

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: TruthxIsxInxThexMist

Again, why should Jews be allowed self governance according to their laws? Why do Christians think it's appropriate to legislate from the Bible and display the 10 Commandments? I mean, we already have laws, right?

The missing factor for Christians and Jews is the frequency to which terrorism is committed in their name throughout the world.

originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: 0zzymand0s

You bring them in for interrogation, and if investigators think everything is okay, then they are out. And this applies to everyone, not just journalists.

Better safe than sorry

I see. I see... So in other words guilty until proven innocent?

a reply to: Xcalibur254

So if a journalist goes on to such a website for research they should be arrested? Or what if someone accidentally stumbles upon such a site?

Up to three clicks is a misdemeanor.

It is funny sometimes how logic and effective answers to a problem are considered hate and fear mongering. I suppose we shall let this violence continue unchecked?

And after that, we can test everyone who believes in the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

If groups like that start mass attacking every week or so then sure, test them too.

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker
If groups like that start mass attacking every week or so then sure, test them too.

But they aren't. You have more of a chance of being shot and killed by a police officer (no matter what race you are) than getting killed by a terrorist. ISIS or otherwise.

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Nikola014

So if a journalist goes on to such a website for research they should be arrested? Or what if someone accidentally stumbles upon such a site?

pretty much, websites must include facebook and twitter too, don't forget google, kik, snapchat...