It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
FBI Director James Comey announced Tuesday that the bureau is recommending the Justice Department pursue no charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a personal email account to handle government business.
But he said that is largely because investigators found Clinton and her team had no intent to violate the law.
She sent and received classified information
Some emails have been lost
Her email might have been hacked
Many servers, not one
So why no charges?
Many speculated about these lies, and now the proof is in the open along with some proof from a recent Inspector General report.
[The damning things the FBI said...
originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: xuenchen
Many speculated about these lies, and now the proof is in the open along with some proof from a recent Inspector General report.
This has been played out before! Does everyone forget how Bush's lies were exposed? There's video's of him being caught in lies! He and his entire corrupt administration were never held accountable! Why should this be any different? They're all lying self-centered power hungry politicians. The justice system Is controlled by them. It's like a family member condemning their own sister or brother. They'll never condemn one of their own!
I thought on what FBI Director James Comey said. Comey stated that she had broken the law and outlined how she had. The world knows now irrefutably that Clinton broke security laws. They know that while she did not do so intentionally, that even the FBI has stated that her actions as a very high ranking official in our country were “Grossly Negligent”. At the same time that Comey passed the buck on indicting Clinton and even went so far as to not recommend it, he has destroyed a good portion of her credibility. What can be said about the capability of a presidential candidate when they can’t even handle emails properly – something that is day one kind of stuff. Clinton has been judged many times in her capacity and many times has the verdict been that she lacks competency and temperament to be our president. This is just one more in a long line of Clinton’s proven blunders.
With these two thoughts, I once again thought on our path to victory. We NEED Clinton to stay in the election because against her we have the best chance. If she is pulled our path will likely become more difficult. Even discounting the ease (or lack thereof) of our victory, we also need to consider her platforms. Atrocious left minded “feel good” policies to be sure, but not as far out there as a pinch hitter could have. We need her wounded, but not so wounded that she will be replaced. Comey has done what we needed him to do – keep Clinton in the race but wound her so she can limp past the convention. Every wound that doesn’t disqualify her will make the debates that much more one sided.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
He said they found no evidence of hackers Then went on to say she used her phone in a country with the technical capability to hack her. That it was possible. He suggested possibility while also saying there was no evidence that hacking took place.
With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Ahabstar
At this point, what difference does your vote make?
It works like a placebo.....
originally posted by: lordcomac
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
originally posted by: Ahabstar
At this point, what difference does your vote make?
It works like a placebo.....
Not for me it doesn't.