Stricter laws wouldn't of stopped Orlando Shooting

Every-time one of these mass shootings happen, our leaders come out and say we need stricter gun laws to keep guns out of criminal hands. I'm going to use the Orlando shooting as an example. Omar Mateen worked as a security guard for G43. He also had a licenses to carry firearms.

Omar Mateen (Here is his wikipedia page)

It also goes on to tell us that Omar Mateen PASSED a criminal back ground check and a psychological test...

He held an active firearms license and an armed security guard license.[32][33] He passed a psychological test and medical exam performed by Dr. Syed Shafeeq Rahman, who had close ties with Mateen's family.[16] It was also noted that Mateen had no criminal record.

Now we have politican's protesting that we need stricter gun laws, which would of never stopped this shooting from happening. I'm going to post some videos, one is of Mateen working as a security guard and the other is a video on contradictions of a Orlando shooting witness. This witness claims that he got trampled and had to crawl out of the nightclub over bodies and blood yet there wasn't a drop of blood on him during his interview right after. You guys make up your own mind on what you think...was it staged?

How could you crawl over dozens of bullet ridden bodies and not get bloody?
www.youtube.com...

Here is the famous video of Mateen. Skip to 36:00
www.youtube.com...

Sorry I'm kinda new to this, I couldn't get the youtube videos to post but got the links.

Only in America does making More laws for something that is already illegal on top of something that is already illegal make 'sense'.

To those that lack absolute sense common or otherwise.

I agree, remove firearms from the situation and people would just resort to homemade bombs anyway. What are they going to do, make everyday household chemicals illegal?

Actually stricter laws would have made it worse. If guns were harder to get he would just have made bombs instead and killed 320 people instead of 49. Anyone with a basic chemistry text book can make a bomb with stuff from home depot that could level a building for $100.00. It is good thing these terrorists are uneducated idiots. Just like the attack at the airport. If they were smart enough to jack one of the airplanes refueling trucks with thousands of gallons of jet fuel and ignited their bombs they could have took out most the airport. Stupid is as stupid does as Forest Gump would say.

How about no more training and entrapment campaigns?

That is probably a good start.

a reply to: Mandroid7

That made my blood boil when I found out the FBI doing that. The agent who came up with that idea should be charged as an accesory w/ conspiracy to commit anytime the plan falls through like it did in Florida, and also should dismantle the whole program. Anyone is capable of bad stuff if you push the right buttons.

The law of incrementalism, or death by a thousand cuts.

It doesn't matter if it would have stopped a tragedy, they will use that tragedy for political gain until they can ban guns.

What do you think their ultimate end-goal is?

a reply to: DeviantMortal

Exactly, you encourage it, you babysit it.

Oopsie, is not acceptable.

Guy had a predisposition to instability.

Not very confidence inspiring. Intentional or accidental.

It is as bad as drug dealing cops.

a reply to: ArnoldNonymous

What do you think their ultimate end-goal is?

Me personally, I think it would be modern-slavery. Everything we do or say they wan't to know about it. I think they actually believe they are above us.

a reply to: BLee8127

As a former correctional officer, I detest all "charge stacking."

Charge stacking is why people do 20 years for smoking a joint whilst in possession of a gun for example.

The FBI could have prevented this and were. They had him under watch and on the no fly , no buy list. Not once but twice. And I have heard they were asked to back off both times. Now , who has the power in the US to back the FBI off twice ? Think about that.

Then you will know who (not what including guns) is killing people in the US.

originally posted by: DeviantMortal
I agree, remove firearms from the situation and people would just resort to homemade bombs anyway. What are they going to do, make everyday household chemicals illegal?

Box cutters,pressure cookers, planes,boats, automobiles.

The state sure has ALOT of things to ban.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: DeviantMortal
I agree, remove firearms from the situation and people would just resort to homemade bombs anyway. What are they going to do, make everyday household chemicals illegal?

Box cutters,pressure cookers, planes,boats, automobiles.

The state sure has ALOT of things to ban.

And we can't forget the shoe bomber.



They should of outlawed Air-Jordens.

a reply to: xuenchen

Don't forget THIS.

From the way back machine.

Breast implants suicide bomb threat: Heathrow on high alert over "credible" intelligence

They gonna BAN fake hooters?

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: xuenchen

Don't forget THIS.

From the way back machine.

Breast implants suicide bomb threat: Heathrow on high alert over "credible" intelligence

They gonna BAN fake hooters?

It wasnt fake hooters that were the problem it was the risk of someone hiding a bomb inside breasts disguised as implants. Just as shoes are not a problem but the ability to hide something in them is. So you just devise a way to check them more thoroughly.

Fake hooters in themselves are not dangerous.

a reply to: BLee8127

Oh I can say they definitely feel above us!

And who wouldn't in their position? They keep treating everyone like trash and lying to us, and people still vote them in office.

They own the government, they own the media, they own science (climate change/global warming/extreme weather), we need to stop rolling over for them.

originally posted by: neo96
Only in America does making More laws for something that is already illegal on top of something that is already illegal make 'sense'.

To those that lack absolute sense common or otherwise.

Well, the problem is that law makers only have the power to make laws.

They can't judge nor execute any laws.

So, out of frustration, even though they know there are already laws on the books, the only "tool" in their tool box to fix any problem is another "law".

If you go to a carpenter with a toothache, he will use a hammer and a nail to knock out the bad tooth. A hammer and a nail, because that's what is in his toolbox.

The law maker has no power to make the judge judge rightly, nor the executive execute expediently.

He can only get the legislature to introduce, raise, and pass, a new law.

Not having the perps elected to the highest office in the US would have ensured none of this ever happened, and of course not bringing high risk floods of immigrants, and even one step further, not destabilizing and destroying the middle east for elite plans, and forcing this influx, and even doing those things to create this, would certainly have made a 100% difference.