FBI 'Revolt of Watergate Proportions' if Hillary Skates

a reply to: xuenchen

Media Matters is a credible source. Unbiased. Non partisan.

Refute the info with reason or
K~

They have turnd a blind eye to all kinds of things.
becouse the work for the bad guys.
do you realy thing they will do one good thing now?

a reply to: Metallicus

I hope that justice is served. But I turned off the right wing radio shows long ago, they are one sided at best and are doing good conservatives a disservice by cherry picking information.They do their best to convince people that Clinton is slammer bound. She isn't.

www.mrctv.org... inton-you-may-have-forgotten

Some other scandals that the Clinton's are going to jail for:

Cattle-Futures Miracle - Hillary’s first commodity trade was in cattle futures where she ordered 10 futures contracts which normally cost $12,000 dollars with only $1,000 dollars in her account. This turned into $6,300 dollars by the next morning and after 10 months totaled $100,000, with trading help from James B. Blair.Text

Whitewater Scandal - Hillary and her husband were partners in a shady real estate development firm called Whitewater Development Corp in Arkansas. Accusations of impropriety against the Clintons and others soon surfaced, regarding improper campaign contributions, political and financial favors, and tax benefits. Clinton’s friends and majority owners, James and Susan McDougal were jailed for fraud, Clinton's successor, Governor Jim Tucker, was jailed for fraud along with municipal judges David Hale and Eugene Fitzhugh who worked with James McDougal. The Clintons walked away unscathed, having apparently done nothing wrong. See Whitewater Timeline.Text

a reply to: reldra

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer

16 Most Notorious Hillary Clinton Scandals

a reply to: neo96

And yet they have not been convicted of anything. If there were real evidence to prove they were guilty of anything, someone would have been able to take it to court, especially those that despise her.

In fact, if there is good evidence of her crimes, why hasn't Judicial Watch taken care of this for us?

a reply to: reldra

Trump will actually be on trial either right before or right after the election. That is going to be a problem for his base. There is no certainty Clinton will face any trial.

The RICO case!
LOL That's why he went after that judge so hard, RICO ain't no joke.
They can burn a mutha with that.

K~

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: reldra

Hillary Roddam Clinton is a career cess pool politician of the WORST kind.,

HRC makes Trump look like a choir boy.

There are only more conspiracy ideas about Hillary Clinton. I doubt anyone can make Trump look like a choir boy.

Neither arrive with clean hands.

I really hate debate that relies on 'the other party/guy does the same corrupt things' type of crap.

It goes on so much that who can seriously argue that the two parties don't get away with murder because they exploit the divide and all the eyes it blinds? Who can seriously claim there is a divide and one party has the moral high ground?

Nonpartisan voters are being held hostage by the voters who do this.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: reldra

From Whitewater to Benghazi: A Clinton-Scandal Primer

16 Most Notorious Hillary Clinton Scandals

I am aware of history. It doesn;t apear, that at this time, she will face trial for anything.

Trump will though. I am not sure you are aware of that. The news just before or after the election (no matter the outcome) will be of Trump on trial.

a reply to: Metallicus


LOL

This is the Republican wet dream....Never gonna happen.

She'll never be indicted for turning over all her personal emails. She'll never be indicted for using a personal server during her tenure as Secretary of State, not while Bush and Cheney are still alive.

Here's why.

If she is, it sets a precedent. The entire Bush White House will be rounded up and sent to Federal Prison. Do not pass go. Do not collect 200 bucks. Straight to jail.

They refused to turn over and instead launched a massive shred, scrub, erase campaign and DELETED MILLIONS of State Department communications from a number of personal servers being used at the State Department. This was common practice. It's also why many people (democrats and fair minded individuals across the country) think Hillary should be given a pass for sending out some things on her own personal server. She apologized and turned over those items.

She did not DESTROY what had to be, incriminating evidence... like the Bush - Cheney - Rice- Rumsfeld White House did.

So - As much as GOP are frothing to establish some charge against her, they know the previous administration will go down like a house of cards if they do.

Pity eh?

a reply to: neo96

No, no silly this time it is different, there is going to be a REVOLT!

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: aethertek

Media Matters is a credible source.

Unbiased.

Non partisan.

One of the worst arms of partisan political propaganda. Same with Factcheck.org, Snopes, and Politifact.

These are probably the most effective sources of media-propaganda, too, because they claim to be watchdogs. Someone really needs to file a class action fraud lawsuit on behalf of their donors.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: reldra

Hillary Roddam Clinton is a career cess pool politician of the WORST kind.,

HRC makes Trump look like a choir boy.

There are only more conspiracy ideas about Hillary Clinton. I doubt anyone can make Trump look like a choir boy.

Neither arrive with clean hands.

I really hate debate that relies on 'the other party/guy does the same corrupt things' type of crap.

It goes on so much that who can seriously argue that the two parties don't get away with murder because they exploit the divide and all the eyes it blinds? Who can seriously claim there is a divide and one party has the moral high ground?

Nonpartisan voters are being held hostage by the voters who do this.

Nonpartisan voters cannot be held hostage. They will vote their conscience.

If I say 'neither comes with clean hands' is that bothersome?

Obviously, in regard to a political party, my preference should be known. But for this thread, I have tried to respond to the OP with normal debate.

What is it that would be better?

a reply to: reldra

"Nonpartisan voters cannot be held hostage. They will vote their conscience. "

It's a figure of speech. I am figuratively 'held hostage by the majority vote.

"If I say 'neither comes with clean hands' is that bothersome?"

Kind of. Because this thread isn't about 'both.' It's about Hillary. And can we please just discuss serious questions and issues concerning her character and ethics without being distracted by Trump? There are active Trump threads, right now, better suited for that.

a reply to: aethertek

All that article has is cherry-picked material from months ago and from last year before official statements from the government were released.

Especially damning is the State Dept Inspector General's report a few weeks ago.

The evidence is real.

originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: reldra

"Nonpartisan voters cannot be held hostage. They will vote their conscience. "

It's a figure of speech. I am figuratively 'held hostage by the majority vote.

"If I say 'neither comes with clean hands' is that bothersome?"

Kind of. Because this thread isn't about 'both.' It's about Hillary. And can we please just discuss serious questions and issues concerning her character and ethics without being distracted by Trump? There are active Trump threads, right now, better suited for that.

I did not mean physically. Non partisan voters should just vote.

If the OP of this thread was factual in any way, shape or form, sure. I understand what you mean.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: aethertek

All that article has is cherry-picked material from months ago and from last year before official statements from the government were released.

Especially damning is the State Dept Inspector General's report a few weeks ago.

The evidence is real.

You are allergic to sourcing?

That was snarky. sorry.

I just hobbled away for some water, you know broken foot.

But as I was going, I thought "That would make a cool movie trailer" . *DEEP VOICE TRAILER GUY* "And the evidence is real....."
From Xuenchen, who brought you "SJW Dark Thirty " and "The Immigrant Wars" comes an epic tale of murder, blue dresses and maybe Donald Trump as a Democrat Plant.



I was really thinking that and not in a bad way.

originally posted by: reldra
If the OP of this thread was factual in any way, shape or form, sure. I understand what you mean.

Unless you have foreknowledge or can predict what's to come, then you cannot discount the OP.

This investigation is STILL ongoing after a year and a half+. There's as much reason to expect a recommendation to indict as there is to expect the FBI to simply close its investigation....maybe more, IMO.

If Hillary is as powerful and corrupt as many people believe (including me), I would never have expected it to have gone this far. But here it is...still going on. It's still supposedly 'unpredictable' and the DNC has still allegedly placed all their bets on Hillary -- even though she could be recommended for an indictment.

If this topic isn't worthy of much focused discussion, I don't know what topic would be.

a reply to: MotherMayEye

The soure discounted the OP. No, I can't see the future. But we need to rely on good sourcing here. There are so many threads that make a mountain out of a poorly written interview copied on on all the nut sites.

OK...and then we get Trump by default? We are fooked.
Cheers

originally posted by: JaMeDoIt
OK...and then we get Trump by default? We are fooked.
Cheers

YEP. Either way we are 'fooked'. I am hoping we are less fooked with Hillary. I am thinking sahe won;t be murdering friends while in office. Trump is a wild card of craziness , though.