It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: breakingbs
If cern was "responsible" they'd have to name it some thing else, as it would have nothing to do with that guy, and it properly didn't anyway. Preferably something long and "sciency" that doesn't have any last or hyphenated last names. No, the cern effect doesn't do it either...
originally posted by: Monger
This 'Mandela effect' is the most embarrassing thing to crawl out from the dumber corners of the internet.
Human memory is not very good at recording things. It's fallable.
But some people can't accept that their recollections are imperfect, so they've constructed this truly laughable theory.
There is no reason to tell anyone in your private life about any Mandela Effect you believe you have experienced. You can only lose; you can't win.
No matter how you slice it, the Mandela Effect we're seeing with the JFK assassination is an entirely new phenomenon.
My conclusion: If the consequences of one's actions are real, it doesn't matter if 'reality' is real
'd wake up and my noisy neighbor would be Hugh Hefner, struttin around his outdoor pool in a robe, surrounded by scantily clad chicks...and I'd suddenly have no arms and legs
This is why...We don't trust Australians, alright! Why should we?
Quit coloring inside the lines and connect the dots man! -*This has been a paid advertisement by the Law Offices of Quantum, Quantum and Quantum.*
Human memory is not very good at recording things. It's fallable.
That "guess" is based on other evidence. Eyewitness testimony is known to be very low on the reliability scale.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Monger
Human memory is not very good at recording things. It's fallable.
And yet in a court case people verbally testify based on memory and are cross examined and then a black robed "senior" takes a guess as to who is more believable, who would have figured hey?
I'm struggling to figure out how or why you dragged 1984 into the discussion. Must have been the result of a dimensional shift.