It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I don't give a *crap* what some SJW or "intellectual" thinks about what I think and do. They can simply go sod off and take their definitions and vile terminology with them.
originally posted by: SomeDumbBroad
a reply to: woodwardjnr
I don't particularly use the term but I hear it a lot... Try a dictionary
I found no actual, legitimate definition of the term, only articles such as the one's below that seem to be telling me I am not allowed to wear feathers in my hair on Halloween or "Twerk" because I am white.... utter absurdity.
What Is Cultural Appropriation And Why It Is Wrong?
The Bane Of Cultural Appropriation
What's Wrong With Cultural Appropriation
The Dos & Donts Of Cultural Appropriation
Scar iest Examples of Cultural Appropriation.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SomeDumbBroad
My opinion only.
I think everyone should take that giant bug that lives up their ass and pull it out. Some cultures have cool things, so others will do it.
What's the big deal?
A term used to describe the taking over of creative or artistic forms, themes, or practices by one cultural group from another. It is in general used to describe Western appropriations of non‐Western or non‐white forms, and carries connotations of exploitation and dominance. The concept has come into literary and visual art criticism by analogy with the acquisition of artefacts (the Elgin marbles, Benin bronzes, Lakota war shirts, etc.) by Western museums. The term emerged during the last twenty years of the 20th cent. as part of the vocabulary of the post‐colonial critique of Western expansionism. One early significant discussion was by Kenneth Coutts‐Smith in ‘Some General Observations on the Concept of Cultural Colonialism’ (1976), where he brings together the Marxist notion of ‘class appropriation’ (the dominant class appropriating and defining ‘high culture’) and what he calls ‘cultural colonialism’, though he himself does not combine the two in the phrase ‘cultural appropriation’. www.oxfordreference.com...
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: SomeDumbBroad
My opinion only.
I think everyone should take that giant bug that lives up their ass and pull it out. Some cultures have cool things, so others will do it.
What's the big deal?
I'm with you in general.
But, the complete appropriation like Rachel Dolezal, I'm not sure. But, didn't she fight for and do a lot for black people?
If you weigh what she did work wise against what she did personally - - - "don't shoot the messenger" - - - I guess.
OXFORD REFERENCE:
A term used to describe the taking over of creative or artistic forms, themes, or practices by one cultural group from another. It is in general used to describe Western appropriations of non‐Western or non‐white forms, and carries connotations of exploitation and dominance. The concept has come into literary and visual art criticism by analogy with the acquisition of artefacts (the Elgin marbles, Benin bronzes, Lakota war shirts, etc.) by Western museums. The term emerged during the last twenty years of the 20th cent. as part of the vocabulary of the post‐colonial critique of Western expansionism. One early significant discussion was by Kenneth Coutts‐Smith in ‘Some General Observations on the Concept of Cultural Colonialism’ (1976), where he brings together the Marxist notion of ‘class appropriation’ (the dominant class appropriating and defining ‘high culture’) and what he calls ‘cultural colonialism’, though he himself does not combine the two in the phrase ‘cultural appropriation’. www.oxfordreference.com...
originally posted by: SomeDumbBroad
a reply to: Annee
See I have no issue with Rachel Dozel. It doesn't bother me in the slightest.
it means when you use the language you butcher it so it can be used along with your mutant language
originally posted by: SomeDumbBroad
a reply to: woodwardjnr
I don't particularly use the term but I hear it a lot... Care to explain what you mean by this?