#TROLLGATE: Hillary Shill Just Spilled The Beans On Trollgate…And It’s Getting Weirder

a reply to: IAMTAT

Exactly

Since we are not supposed to do copy pastes over 3 paragraphs I will just add the list of actions demanded of the astro turfers by HRC and her campaign.

Be sure to read the explanation of how to accomplish each of the following

1) Sexism.

2) Racism.

3) Electability.

4) Dirty tactics.

5) Opponent outreach.

Please see the source for more details!

How can anyone think this is a good thing in politics, are we now defending the rampant lies and disinformation as acceptable? I know I would not want to vote for the flip flop queen, errr ummm #WhichHillary, the Queen of Wall Street is buying lies for you!

a reply to: AlaskanDad

No internet shill effort will ever top FightTheSmears. I've had eight years to roll my eyes about FightTheSmears, and it would take a lot for me to be aghast by another organized campaign shill-effort on the internet.

I cringe when I recall the racebaiting, exploitative days of FightTheSmears.

U.S. elections are nothing to be proud of.

a reply to: Annee

Evidently . . . you have a different construction on reality re the heart of man . . . and how corrosively corrupt such systems

AUTOMATICALLY and quickly become.

Every time.

Every time.

Even the Biblical example didn't last long.

a reply to: dreamingawake

Actually, she was chosen and trained as a dyed-in-the-wool Communist from early in her adult life--after her Goldwater years. . . . as Maxine Waters or some such bragged about decades ago.

The oligarchy is determined to remake the world along the lines of Communism mixed with a bastardized monopoly form of capitalism. This has long been known. They have bragged about it in a number of documents. The gritchy one is merely playing her puppet role at higher levels . . . as assigned.

She just does it with a ruthlessness, vileness, vengefulness, evil-heartedness that is shocking for those who work around her without blinders and lobotomies to see.

originally posted by: introvert
. . .
And if the goal is to control the masses, it's not working. ATS is proof.

What unmitigated nonsense.

The raft of gah-gah sheeple spewing the party line of various components of the oligarchy's memes, schemes, themes, plans, values, etc.

is nothing short of extremely shocking.

There used to be more evidence of higher IQ's in the thought processes until such greater numbers of sheeple Eloi began to carry such a large percentage of the posting weight hereon.

It has been an ongoing very sobering indication to a number of us as to how far down the yellow brick road to hell the oligarchy has already managed to shove the media, what passes as discourse in the public square, . . . etc. etc. etc.

originally posted by: introvert

. . .

A person with a logical and skeptical mindset will not believe anything unless proof is provided. A conspiratorial mindset is neither logical or skeptical. . . .

Nonsense yet again.

Very bright people with a very logical and fittingly skeptical mindset

will have realized relatively early in life

that FAR FROM ALL of life fits in tidy little boxes in lock-step line with whatever fantasies the cult of Scientism and related groups imagine.

They will have realized early on that many things are not discoverable by such rigidly narrow analyses, constructs and structures.

They will have realized that many things that are ABSOLUTELY TRUE are simply not easily, if at all discoverable through such narrow notions, blather and trumped up structures.

One can know their spouse via dissection--a la the Cult of Scientism--rather hard on the spouse and the relationship

or

by 'KNOWING' their spouse by imersion, experiential merging--as in Adam Knew Eve and she conceived a son . . .

Those addicted to doing their own thing--often in fierce rebellion--seem to also be addicted to only tolerating a very narrow and rigid route to knowing much of anything.

Their loss.

That leaves them open to understanding very well at all, if well at all--a very limited slice of reality.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Some people must be getting paid to write what they do.

It can't be anything else! lol!!

That dude was getting only $100 a week? Cig and beer money, I guess.

Cheap date.

Probably helps pay the rent for living in Mom's basement at 40.

Haha!

Hillary creating jobs!

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: dreamingawake

Actually, she was chosen and trained as a dyed-in-the-wool Communist from early in her adult life--after her Goldwater years. . . . as Maxine Waters or some such bragged about decades ago.

The oligarchy is determined to remake the world along the lines of Communism mixed with a bastardized monopoly form of capitalism. This has long been known. They have bragged about it in a number of documents. The gritchy one is merely playing her puppet role at higher levels . . . as assigned.

She just does it with a ruthlessness, vileness, vengefulness, evil-heartedness that is shocking for those who work around her without blinders and lobotomies to see.

She wrote a 92 page thesis on Alinsky.

"Thesis[edit]
Rodham researched the thesis by interviewing Alinsky and others, and by conducting visits to low-income areas of Chicago (near where she grew up) and observing Community Action Programs in those areas.[1] Her thesis adviser was Wellesley professor of political science Alan Schechter.[2]

The thesis was generally sympathetic to Alinsky, but offered a critique of Alinsky's methods as largely ineffective, all the while describing Alinsky's personality as appealing.[3][4] The thesis sought to fit Alinsky into a line of American social activists, including Eugene V. Debs, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Walt Whitman. Written in formal academic language, the thesis concluded that "[Alinsky's] power/conflict model is rendered inapplicable by existing social conflicts" and that Alinsky's model had not expanded nationally due to "the anachronistic nature of small autonomous conflict."[4]

In the acknowledgements and end notes of the thesis, Rodham thanked Alinsky for two interviews and a job offer. She declined the latter, saying that "after spending a year trying to make sense out of [Alinsky's] inconsistency, I need three years of legal rigor." The thesis was praised by all four of its reviewers[5] and Rodham, an honors student at Wellesley, received an A grade on it.[4] She stayed in touch with Alinsky for the next several years and the two expressed regard for each other.[3]"

So she well versed in all the black arts.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: AlaskanDad

I remember awhile back when i mentioned the topic of paid trolls. I even wrote a topic on it and how to spot them in great detail. I had a brutal time.

Can I be vindicated now?
It's Time to fight Back- How To Identify A Troll

Because honestly.. the cat's out of the bag so might as well aye?
S&F

originally posted by: SoulSurfer
a reply to: AlaskanDad

I remember awhile back when i mentioned the topic of paid trolls. I even wrote a topic on it and how to spot them in great detail. I had a brutal time.

Can I be vindicated now?
It's Time to fight Back- How To Identify A Troll

Because honestly.. the cat's out of the bag so might as well aye?
S&F

I remember your great thread. It was illuminating.
Tell us your thoughts on AD's topic. Is there anything you can add, considering your personal experience with this type of thing?

Be honest with ourselves.

Obviously there are people paid to be on here.

US Govt, China, Russia and even ISIS. CIA, MI6, Mossad ... everyone!

Every dog ( i use that term with intent although it is an insult to our canine friends ) in the US Race has people in these forums.

They are not that difficult to spot.

So ..... use them.

Check their comments, check when they come out to comment and learn what their masters wish to obscure.

Now you are well informed.

Understand that you need to find out and can find out what these Masters want you to believe.

You can also tell when things are desperate ... and when they are not.

You have the power!

P

a reply to: onequestion

Did you read the article? Perhaps you get paid anyway?

a reply to: AlaskanDad

...and he had a better paying job offered at the same time?

Was the new job for Trump's campaign? Okay, first task, go online and claim to be a internet shill who quit Hilary's campaign for moral reasons.

"But if he was working for Trump, than was he really working for Hilary?" Oops! I just went cross-eyed.

Don't trust what you read on the internet. Goes both ways. Should have the same opinion on junk coming out about 'disgruntled Trump staffers' too. Since anyone can hire someone to claim they working for the opposite.

a reply to: IAMTAT
Nothing really "new" to add, everything has been said. However there is a link between the paid internet trolls and other types of trolls.


Black lives matters is paid by George Soros.
Occupy wall-street Paid by George Soros
I am curious, if George Soros is behind the Hilary case.

But they all have one thing in common, they disrupt society to cause chaos & confusion in order to further divide & alienate the public or person(s). The only goal is character assassination, search & destroy. You're seeing it within mainstream and other sources during the attacks on Donald Trump. (for example).

They labeled trump as racist, bigoted, while trying to apply political correctness.

Political correctness in itself is a troll tactic. And a very successful one at that. It is a whole new level of trolling.
But you can see through political correctness by staying within range of common sense, morality & care.


But busting open this can of worms, (just an example), Do you see the trend and the similarities between them?
Occupy Wallstreet


Trump Protestors/blm (yes Caucasians are also participating with Black lives matter.)


I don't like Bill o'reily, but he is right on target on this one. (Which surprised me. But then again, Bill once upon a time was trying to expose the illuminati. I think he sold out in the end.)



Bill Oreily Investigating the Illuminati


The reason im saying this is because there is really nothing "new" to add. It's virtually the same tactic being done over and over again because it has a high success rate due to people having a Naive mindset. This tactic has been used for a couple hundred years (if not more)

To see this though, I invite you to watch the Origin of all this mess. Watching these chapters from "Know Your enemy" will give you a much clearer view on this tactic being done.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: dreamingawake

Actually, she was chosen and trained as a dyed-in-the-wool Communist from early in her adult life--after her Goldwater years. . . . as Maxine Waters or some such bragged about decades ago.

The oligarchy is determined to remake the world along the lines of Communism mixed with a bastardized monopoly form of capitalism. This has long been known. They have bragged about it in a number of documents. The gritchy one is merely playing her puppet role at higher levels . . . as assigned.

She just does it with a ruthlessness, vileness, vengefulness, evil-heartedness that is shocking for those who work around her without blinders and lobotomies to see.

She wrote a 92 page thesis on Alinsky.

"Thesis[edit]
Rodham researched the thesis by interviewing Alinsky and others, and by conducting visits to low-income areas of Chicago (near where she grew up) and observing Community Action Programs in those areas.[1] Her thesis adviser was Wellesley professor of political science Alan Schechter.[2]

The thesis was generally sympathetic to Alinsky, but offered a critique of Alinsky's methods as largely ineffective, all the while describing Alinsky's personality as appealing.[3][4] The thesis sought to fit Alinsky into a line of American social activists, including Eugene V. Debs, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Walt Whitman. Written in formal academic language, the thesis concluded that "[Alinsky's] power/conflict model is rendered inapplicable by existing social conflicts" and that Alinsky's model had not expanded nationally due to "the anachronistic nature of small autonomous conflict."[4]

In the acknowledgements and end notes of the thesis, Rodham thanked Alinsky for two interviews and a job offer. She declined the latter, saying that "after spending a year trying to make sense out of [Alinsky's] inconsistency, I need three years of legal rigor." The thesis was praised by all four of its reviewers[5] and Rodham, an honors student at Wellesley, received an A grade on it.[4] She stayed in touch with Alinsky for the next several years and the two expressed regard for each other.[3]"

So she well versed in all the black arts.

en.wikipedia.org...

Exactly why she has no problem pandering to cover what she really is:

"The Crony Capitalism Of Hillary Clinton"

Unlike her husband, Hillary Clinton was a disciple of Saul Alinksy, the radical Marxist who employed social activism as a means of destroying both private and governmental institutions so that a “new era” could take its place.

Well, until now with this OP's subject.

Source
Not going to get a non Communist Socialism from her.

a reply to: onequestion

Would he be the first?

I would beg to differ. People have given up far more than a pay check for their morals before now.

a reply to: SoulSurfer

"Know your enemy" is an excellent series I highly recommend to everyone.

Thanks for your posts.

originally posted by: burgerbuddy

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: burgerbuddy
Some people must be getting paid to write what they do.

It can't be anything else! lol!!

That dude was getting only $100 a week? Cig and beer money, I guess.

Cheap date.

Probably helps pay the rent for living in Mom's basement at 40.

Haha!

Hillary creating jobs!

Star for that one lol.

I wonder how much she is paying and for how much content? Just an hour or two of writing and I'd be willing to do it. Bet you have to be a Hillary supporter though. I'd assume they offer the work to people they poll.