It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
.who needs a cable box when you have the internet...
originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
Not liking a president using executive orders like a King or Prince.
He's not a King. He's not a Prince. He's a president of a republic.
originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
a reply to: Gothmog
Does he even consult with the congress before he writes an executive order?
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
Not liking a president using executive orders like a King or Prince.
He's not a King. He's not a Prince. He's a president of a republic.
No, you've got a congress who act like a bunch of school kids that leaves no other option. Maybe whoever wins next time they will be grown up enough to not deflect everything just to try and score points and actually look fully at the proposals.
Score points with who? If you think they're scoring points with the people, you're not paying attention.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
a reply to: Gothmog
Does he even consult with the congress before he writes an executive order?
From what I have read , no. Thats why Congress is so upset. So , with that being said , he does fit the definition of Dictator at least a good part of it.
originally posted by: uncommitted
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
a reply to: Gothmog
Does he even consult with the congress before he writes an executive order?
From what I have read , no. Thats why Congress is so upset. So , with that being said , he does fit the definition of Dictator at least a good part of it.
The Executive Orders are passed mainly because Congress won't budge on anything because they are acting and have acted for nearly four years like sulky children. At least state facts.
originally posted by: John_Rodger_Cornman
a reply to: Gothmog
Does he even consult with the congress before he writes an executive order?
Its far easier to do all sorts of outlandish crap (like force ACA through without even reading the goddamned thing first) to create division, then point and whine about how divisive "they" are.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
Its far easier to do all sorts of outlandish crap (like force ACA through without even reading the goddamned thing first) to create division, then point and whine about how divisive "they" are.
The ACA is a law, not an executive order.
It carries the weight of law, an executive order does not.
Congress does not seem to need any excuse to be assholes. Don't put it on this admin because it's been an ongoing process.
ACA is an example of divisive behavior on the part of the Presidents party, and its the kind of shenanigans that led to the GOP congress having an excuse to be divisive, too.
If you're referring to the ACA, that's not really an accurate statement. I think it would be closer to say "This thing is a monster. It is so expansive that those who wrote it don't really know what it means or what all its consequences will be but what's been happening in medical care so far is broken. Consider this a work in progress." You imply that the entire constituency is dissatisfied with the results. I don't think that's true. I think that people who were previously unable to obtain medical insurance at any price are not dissatisfied.
Only that sending out your crony in Congress to say "We have to pass the bill to know whats in it" is not the way you spread good will among your constituents.
Sounds like another Democrat campaign ruse.