It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
. . . Gradual loss of species coherence and more people being unable to successfully breed with other humans.
originally posted by: The angel of light
I only can answer that with the same upside down logic that there is people that can't host a baby inside for nine months, can't give birth to a child naturally, can't feed a baby with the milk of her chest, but they believe to be women, like for instance Mr. Bruce Jenner.
Now, with all respect, if Mr. Jenner or any other transgender decides to feel insulted by this comment why we don't ask the millions of natural women what they feel when somebody comes and say to them that an artificial woman can perform their role in life entirely equally?
How in the world medicine can develop treatments that are killing fundamental organs of the body of a young person and believe it is ethically correct?
The fact that while we allow them to reject their reality and substitute their own, it isn't enough. Instead all of us must be forced to reject reality to suit them.
I only can answer that with the same upside down logic that there is people that can't host a baby inside for nine months, can't give birth to a child naturally, can't feed a baby with the milk of her chest, but they believe to be women, like for instance Mr. Bruce Jenner.
originally posted by: The angel of light
The Peace of God to all that belong to the Light,
Dear Readers,
We have seen along all the past year the tremendous media campaign in support of who after so many years of not producing
a real great achievement in his life, suddenly became a celebrity everywhere:
Bruce Jenner a Gold Olympic medal Athlete in Montreal 1976 that suddenly transformed to Mrs Katrine Jenner, a woman that legally is still
a baby, since her life is counted in months not in years.
Well, now we have a case of a woman that after deep personal reflection has found that she is actually a cat that is living in the body
of a human body.
I am wondering if there is no Physician that wants to receive the Nobel Prize and have the necessary charity act to develop a treatment
to allow this confused 20 year Norway girl to achieve her true self? to be perhaps the first Trans specie person of History?
www.msn.com...
Some Mandatory questions to ask here that comes to my mind are:
Is this case defying the point of view of the Transgender community and all the medical industry that is profiting of the so costly change of gender treatments?
Is this showing to us that medicine opened a Pandora Box to accept to change Gender instead to apply psychiatric therapies to fix the condition?
Is this case giving the reason to deffenders of the traditional moral that you claim you can't heal the mind by damaging the body, supported by Religious organizations?
Is modern medicine open to accept this new challenge or to the contrary this will promote a professional debate , to restore an ethical approach to many things that right now are done in Hospitals around the world just for marketing to respond the trends of demand?
Is really ethical to offer medical treatments to transform the body beyond what it is naturally granted by birth in order to try to fix problems that exist in the mind?
The thread is of course open to the free discussion of the topic provided that the replies remain in the boundaries of what is the rules of decorum and mutual respect.
Thanks,
The Angel of Lightness
originally posted by: Morrad
a reply to: ketsuko
The fact that while we allow them to reject their reality and substitute their own, it isn't enough. Instead all of us must be forced to reject reality to suit them.
Peter Tatchell, a gay human rights campaigner in the UK, has changed sides in the gay cake saga. He now advocates anti-discrimination against individuals, not ideas.
originally posted by: The angel of light
Is really ethical to offer medical treatments to transform the body beyond what it is naturally granted by birth in order to try to fix problems that exist in the mind?
Is really ethical to offer medical treatments to transform the body beyond what it is naturally granted by birth in order to try to fix problems that exist in the mind?
originally posted by: Darmok
They said that 1:68 kids are being born autistic. Years ago, it was 1:1,000. Now air, land and water are poisoned. So is the food and medicine.
People just want to re-design the world. Whatever. We can't stop it. Nature will stop it eventually.
That is the UK. In the USA - - it is not discriminatory to decline the wording or special decorations for a cake.
It is discriminatory to refuse to bake a cake, using standard design/decoration that has been used/offered to heterosexual couples.
originally posted by: The angel of light
a reply to: Annee
I don't think so, as a matter of fact the decision of Mrs Katrine Jenner to want to date a man is clearly showing that Mr Bruce Jenner was along an entire life a repressed Homosexual.