It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: intrptr
Good. Now turn one hair on your head white or black.
originally posted by: Psychonautics
So you posted a well worded and well meaning thread, but just had to end it with something akin to DON'T REPLY WHEN IF YOU DON'T AGREE.
Man, what's the point of posting, then?
Curve balls ain't magic.
"I believe the technique is just the ritual and it is the Will that achieves the objective."
"This can be achieved in any sphere of life. It is a question of getting the Will to bend matter."
The hair on my head have already materialized and are not in the wave state.
originally posted by: UKTruth
My only doubt comes from some new theories that suggest solidity does not exist - it's just an interpretation of our own minds. If that were true then the mind would ultimately control, and be able to shape, everything.
originally posted by: Sahabi
a reply to: crowdedskies
Wonderfully said, and I agree with the essence and nature of what you are alluding to. This op is a rare gem amongst the static, thanks
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: crowdedskies
The hair on my head have already materialized and are not in the wave state.
The wave state? Whats that?
originally posted by: bastion
It's basic lift/drag physics. He's capable of doing it 1 time in 100 as he's had years of practice (used to play across the road from me in his early career). If it's all in the head why can't every other player equally do the same so no one will ever score a goal ever again?
You mention quantum mechanics, where are your PDE for this? Why not just be honest and say you picked the word out of thin air and tried to apply it to something you clearly have no knowledge of because it sounds 'cool'.
It's reads like you're trying to declare you're Da Vinci before learning how to hold a pen to anyone with basic physics/applied maths education.
originally posted by: bastion
As a scientific type (degrees in applied maths, law and journalism) can you please not do?
It's obvious to anyone who has studied the subjects you haven't applied any critical thinking or scientific approach, which is ok for you, but to the general populace all you're doing is further entrenching common, long debunked misconceptions about QM and consciousness and making it sound as if there's evidence to support things - it's at best misleading and at worst actively deceitful and may put off brilliant minds from helping humanity discover more about mother nature.
Of course I'm denying your interpretation of QM as it's completely wrong, but a common mistake the public make. It stems from the ambiguous language used in Schrodinger's Cat hypothesis - the mind has nothing to do with the state, you have just what the term observer actually means in QM.