It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
So basically, when Obama said I'd save $2,500/year, my premiums went up. Now Bernie is promising that total government control will make save me as much as $1,500 more per year than Obama promised?
Uh-huh, so should I just go file that bankruptcy now to beat the rush?
I can barely afford the extra money Obamacare costs.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
For those that oppose Sanders and wish to keep our current rulers:
originally posted by: ketsuko
So basically, when Obama said I'd save $2,500/year, my premiums went up. Now Bernie is promising that total government control will make save me as much as $1,500 more per year than Obama promised?
Uh-huh, so should I just go file that bankruptcy now to beat the rush?
I can barely afford the extra money Obamacare costs.
originally posted by: LeoStarchild
Or.. just let the private sector handle it. If you don't have a job.. well .. get one.
originally posted by: Moors
originally posted by: LeoStarchild
Or.. just let the private sector handle it. If you don't have a job.. well .. get one.
The private sector has failed. Even with ACA 9 million are still without health insurance and the lust for corporate profits makes deductibles and premiums barely affordable for most.
We don't need corporate-friendly darwinism in government policy.
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
Some people just need to understand there are things in society we need that are not best served by the free market and the concepts of economic growth and profit. Health care law enforcement and the penal system are just a few of these things, best served by a sensible tax system. I'm not saying the private sector can't contribute to the success of these systems and ease the burden on the tax payer, but on the whole. Some things are not best served by the private sector with its emphasis on profit and growth.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
a reply to: poncho1982
Either way when you elect corporate politicians rather R's or D's you get laws that favor the corporations, not laws that help the people. i.e. corporate rule.
originally posted by: ketsuko
So basically, when Obama said I'd save $2,500/year, my premiums went up. Now Bernie is promising that total government control will make save me as much as $1,500 more per year than Obama promised?
Uh-huh, so should I just go file that bankruptcy now to beat the rush?
I can barely afford the extra money Obamacare costs.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: AlaskanDad
As we already see, this type of comment is ruined by the failed execution of the ACA.
Now the arguments of why it failed is going to be highly contested, as would be the reasoning WHY the numbers didn't work out for some.
People that got screwed have every reason to be weary of this type of comment.
It saddens me that people think that the ACA is even close to socialized medicine, when I have my tin foil hat on it makes me wonder if that wasn't all part of the plan.