Hillary's New Years Resolution...Ignore Donald Trump and hard audience questions.

Once again, as discussed in this thread,

Link to thread

it seems Hillary does not want to answer the questions from those in attendance at her rallies that are not part of her narrative or wearing an earpiece. It was revealed she did this on 2007 so why not now.

She spurred this question weeks ago by poking the GOP and blaming them for the rise if ISIS and the use of Trump's declaration on Islam immigrants as a recruiting tool for ISIS. There was no such video when she said this(like there was no Benghazi video), but, it stirred up her base and made the GOP field look like Islam hating knuckle-draggers as I have read referenced in teh MSM. She is trying to show the GOP in a bad light. When you kick the bear be ready to fight back, or in her case...ignore it?

At a rally last night someone asked about Trump stating that she and Obama are the ones responsible for ISIS. Again, the GOP is simply hitting back after the jab in December. All she has to do is simply deny it, or answer it. She does neither.

Link to video

This is an honest question. There are multiple reports that the State Department helped to fund rebels that are associated with ISIS/ISIL in the region and the pictures of them using US equipment are out there that were sourced back to ISIS by the rebels supported by the current administration. Just like supporting the Taliban for earlier administrations spawned Al-Qaeda.

The problem again is, why cannot she not address these issues? Again, if she cannot answer a crowd sourced question at a town hall meeting, is she the one we need to negotiate with world leaders like Putin? Her solution....a New Years resolution to....

Ignore Donald Trump.

Really? The person who is in the media more than any other GOP candidate? The one that she should be confronting? I for one cannot wait for the presidential debates in 2016.

She's afraid....VERY afraid.

originally posted by: matafuchs
Once again, as discussed in this thread,

Link to thread

it seems Hillary does not want to answer the questions from those in attendance at her rallies that are not part of her narrative or wearing an earpiece. It was revealed she did this on 2007 so why not now.

She spurred this question weeks ago by poking the GOP and blaming them for the rise if ISIS and the use of Trump's declaration on Islam immigrants as a recruiting tool for ISIS. There was no such video when she said this(like there was no Benghazi video), but, it stirred up her base and made the GOP field look like Islam hating knuckle-draggers as I have read referenced in teh MSM. She is trying to show the GOP in a bad light. When you kick the bear be ready to fight back, or in her case...ignore it?

At a rally last night someone asked about Trump stating that she and Obama are the ones responsible for ISIS. Again, the GOP is simply hitting back after the jab in December. All she has to do is simply deny it, or answer it. She does neither.

Link to video

This is an honest question. There are multiple reports that the State Department helped to fund rebels that are associated with ISIS/ISIL in the region and the pictures of them using US equipment are out there that were sourced back to ISIS by the rebels supported by the current administration. Just like supporting the Taliban for earlier administrations spawned Al-Qaeda.

The problem again is, why cannot she not address these issues? Again, if she cannot answer a crowd sourced question at a town hall meeting, is she the one we need to negotiate with world leaders like Putin? Her solution....a New Years resolution to....

Ignore Donald Trump.

Really? The person who is in the media more than any other GOP candidate? The one that she should be confronting? I for one cannot wait for the presidential debates in 2016.

Maybe she is mentally unstable, if so her doctors should report her immediately. I hope she doesn't own guns.

a reply to: matafuchs

I'm not a big Hillary Supporter but it's actually a good idea. She's obviously realized the more you talk about Trump, the better he does.

She's hoping if she ignores him, maybe the media will follow and eventually he'll just go away.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
She's afraid....VERY afraid.

That the election might be a fair one.

Otherwise shes in.

a reply to: intrptr

Poor widdle Hillerwee...is afwaid of the big mean old Donald. tsk tsk.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: intrptr

Poor widdle Hillerwee...is afwaid of the big mean old Donald. tsk tsk.

It is just childish to make up funny names for people. It distracts from your post.

a reply to: matafuchs
It is a pretty good idea to ignore Trump.

a reply to: PsychoEmperor

Yeah, ask Jeb and his PAC's how that is working out.

a reply to: reldra

In a position such as the POTUS, she is going to encounter people that are much scarier than Donald Trump. I think it is a mistake and will make her look weak to the middle road voter.

Right now Reuters has a poll that looks like this

Clinton 38%
Trump 32%
Other 30%

Trump is rising and she is falling in the last month. That is a lot of undecided voters.

Link

a reply to: matafuchs

Yeah...Maybe Hillary should 'RESET' her relationship with Trump...It worked so well for her with that big bully Putin.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: reldra

In a position such as the POTUS, she is going to encounter people that are much scarier than Donald Trump. I think it is a mistake and will make her look weak to the middle road voter.

Right now Reuters has a poll that looks like this

Clinton 38%
Trump 32%
Other 30%

Trump is rising and she is falling in the last month. That is a lot of undecided voters.

Link

I do not like her. Make no mistake. But I am not sure responding to questions about him or his crazy rhetoric will help her.

a reply to: PsychoEmperor

The media will never ignore Trump...it's good watching. Good for numbers. It's pure busyness

We she wheeled out the Slick Willie this early.

She is desperate.

If the Dems have any class at all...They vote for Bernie.

I can't understand why when the Clinton's have failed is for 30 years.

Anybody would consider voting for her.

a reply to: matafuchs

Ignoring Donald Trump seems like a pretty good idea to me too.

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: matafuchs
It is a pretty good idea to ignore Trump.

Usually to ignore something or someone long enough makes
it tough to talk the issue down later that spurred the ignorance.
I think it would be a good idea for ANY front runner to
stay engaged through this primary cycle-- or the voter base may
catch the amnesia. I hear it's contagious in both major parties.

If a Purple Gang debate happened tomorrow night-- and the Don
took the gloves off (like as if Hil needs a pair either, she's in favor)
there wouldn't be enough in Debbie's checkbook for the band-aids.

Ignorance. though? I consider the posturing this far into it arrogance.

a reply to: matafuchs

Hillary has nothing to worry about, as long as she keeps on using diapers. Tough questions in debates with Trump may freeze her face momentarily - and we all know then why.

LOL

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: reldra

In a position such as the POTUS, she is going to encounter people that are much scarier than Donald Trump. I think it is a mistake and will make her look weak to the middle road voter.

Right now Reuters has a poll that looks like this

Clinton 38%
Trump 32%
Other 30%

Trump is rising and she is falling in the last month. That is a lot of undecided voters.

Link

The reason shes shown 'ahead' in the polls is because they already picked her. That neck and neck stuff will continue to close and be hairs breath edge of your seat entertainment until the last minute for idiots that still think the process is actually determined by voting.

didn't bother to read your posts or thread... star for the thread title !

good observation

a reply to: intrptr

It's Koch vs Soros...but I think some people were not expecting Trump to perform the way he has.