Did Bernie Sanders take credit card info?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
It is kinda of fun...in a political microcosm sort of way...watching two socialists fighting over stealing other people's money from each other.

Chris Matthews vs. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "What's The Difference Between A Democrat And A Socialist?"

Answer: Sanders is out of the closet.

a reply to: Malynn

Maybe not in name.
Progressive/Liberal Democrats would also work.

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: IAMTAT
It is kinda of fun...in a political microcosm sort of way...watching two socialists fighting over stealing other people's money from each other.

Chris Matthews vs. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: "What's The Difference Between A Democrat And A Socialist?"

Answer: Sanders is out of the closet.

What HE said.

UPDATE:

Deal reached between Sanders and DNC doesn’t do away with the disdain
By John Wagner December 19 at 10:11 AM

The accord announced after midnight between Bernie Sanders’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee did little to paper over their discord.

In early Saturday morning statements, both parties relayed that the DNC — facing a federal lawsuit from the Sanders camp — had agreed to end its suspension of the campaign’s access to key voter information contained in a DNC-controlled database, including data the Sanders campaign had gathered about its own supporters.

The Vermont senator claimed a breach of contract resulted earlier in the week when the DNC cut his campaign off after several of his staffers improperly reviewed proprietary information gathered by Hillary Clinton. The intrusion

came during a stretch when a firewall in the database was mistakenly dropped by a contractor hired by the DNC.

In its statement, the Sanders campaign claimed the DNC had “capitulated” and committed an “about face” on a punishment that the Sanders team characterized as far over-reaching.

“We are extremely pleased that the DNC has reversed its outrageous decision,” said Jeff Weaver, Sanders’s campaign manager, adding: “Clearly, they were very concerned about their prospects in court.”

In its statement, the DNC maintained that what Sanders’s camp had done was “completely unacceptable” and said that “the DNC expects each campaign to operate with integrity going forward with respect to the voter file.”

The DNC also stressed that the Sanders campaign had agreed to cooperate with an investigation that would continue.

The dueling statements came just hours after Weaver and DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz both appeared on MSBNC’s “All in with Chris Hayes” and did little to hide the disdain they apparently were feeling toward one another.

Wasserman Schultz told guest host Alex Wagner that Sanders was “a man of integrity” but that Sanders’s campaign staff “is not serving him very well. And she used this analogy to describe the data breach:

“It’s as if you found a house with an unlocked front door and instead of locking it and notifying authorities, you went in and you took things, ransacked the house and took things that didn't belong to you. And then you expect to continue to have access to the house.”

On the show, Wasserman Schultz also suggested that the Sanders’s camp had been dragging its feet to provide a full accounting of the incident to the DNC -- a condition it had set for restoring access to the data.

During a separate interview, Weaver hotly disputed that, holding up his phone to show an email sent the night before to a top staffer at the DNC.

“I’m happy to provide it to anybody in the media, which will demonstrate that, of course, what the chairwoman said was absolutely false,” Weaver said. “We have responded with information. If they wanted additional information, they certainly should have let us know.”

Weaver also suggested the DNC was likely to settle the case because they were afraid of what might come out in the discovery process of the legal proceedings.

“We will get access to all the internal communications of the DNC where we can demonstrate what I think most people think is going on, which is that there are some people in there who are clearly trying to help the Clinton campaign,” he said.

The Clinton camp, meanwhile, aggressively went after the Sanders campaign on Friday afternoon, with Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon accusing the Sanders staffers who discovered the Clinton data of acting “like kids in the candy store.”

“They went hog wild, downloading as much data as they could,” he said on CNN.

The Sanders campaign acknowledged that four staffers had viewed the data, one of whom was fired.

Later Friday, the Clinton camp struck a more conciliatory tone, issuing a statement in which Fallon said that his campaign was hopeful the matter would be resolved Friday night and that the Sanders team would get access to its voter files “right away.”

But a few hours after the matter was resolved, Fallon put out a statement highlighting the fact that the Sanders campaign had “agreed to submit to an independent audit to determine the full extent of the intrusion.”

“We believe this audit should proceed immediately, and, pending its findings, we expect further disciplinary action to be taken as appropriate,” he said.

www.washingtonpost.com...

a reply to: IAMTAT

Man I hope they pour through everything with a fine toothed comb. This will not be good for DWS & DNC!

a reply to: Malynn

I think the DNC caved, thinking they would rather not have their operations examined too closely.

Also, if I was a Clinton donor through the DNC...I would cancel my credit card, if they had it on file.
There's no telling who else could have gained financial information from that security leak.

Anyone remember the Watergate scandal?

In those days, they had 'plumbers' actually enter an office to get campaign data from actual papers.

Nixon wasn't one of the plumbers..... so he wasn't involved.... right?

OH PLAEEEZZE!!! This is all a "Hillary" creation! "Dirty" Debbie Wasserman-Shultz is clearly an agent of the Hillary camp!

a reply to: Malynn

I disagree. The comment telling someone to "use Google" brings relevancy to that portion of my comment. But this thread isn't about Google.

new thread