It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Guess I will go on my usual rant, that no one from the pro-gun side has ever answered. I live in an open carry state, my son, open carries at times when I am with him, I have no problem with that. However he had an in-law that felt the need to open carry to a 5 YO's family birthday party picnic at a private home, not in the inner city, something that seemed a bit inappropriate to me.
2nd question, outside of walking a field looking for game, or all out war, can someone please give me a reasonable cause to open carry long guns?
ETA: Guess I just brought reasonable into the conversation. Hats off to texan, guess that word is used.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Polls are an interesting thing, supposedly the pollsters can't call cell phones, so the only folks they can find to poll are old white folks, something tells me this skews the polls.
originally posted by: the owlbear
The NRA is just a group of gun and ammunition manufacturers who lobby Congress and spread fear to those who own guns in order to get them to buy more guns and ammo.
Preying on the fears of the weak-minded. I'm all about responsible gun ownership, but put me in the unfavorable column when dealing with the Big Guns N Bigger Ammo lobby.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Guess I will go on my usual rant, that no one from the pro-gun side has ever answered. I live in an open carry state, my son, open carries at times when I am with him, I have no problem with that. However he had an in-law that felt the need to open carry to a 5 YO's family birthday party picnic at a private home, not in the inner city, something that seemed a bit inappropriate to me.
2nd question, outside of walking a field looking for game, or all out war, can someone please give me a reasonable cause to open carry long guns?
ETA: Guess I just brought reasonable into the conversation. Hats off to texan, guess that word is used.
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: buni11687
Favourable or unfavourable statistics aside, debates aside, one thing stands out among all other aspects regarding US citizens and their relationship with the US government vis-a-vis gun ownership and that is:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
Now, it is abundantly clear to this poster that the security of a free state is currently being compromised by the US government because the NSA spies, the FBI entraps, the CIA wars and the DHS / domestic law enforcement is upgrading to military grade enforcement - so your freedom is in jeapordy and politicians want to erode the constitution and amendments of inconvenience, so I'll say it again, just to drive it home....
Never before in the history of the United States of America has it been more vital that citizens are armed, because as sure as sh!t, your government wants to fully disarm you - one "restriction" and "mass shooting" at a time, one "comparison to Australia" at a time - FACT.
I'm glad this poll supports the NRA, even though in the big scheme of things, it's irrelevant to what the US governments real modus operandi is in regards to this topic.
Please point me to the website of a well regulated militia. I am not anti gun, am anti idiots owning them. There are too many accidental shootings, suicide by gun, and other gun related injuries in this country. There is a huge difference between a guy smacking his old lady around and emptying a clip in her.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Guess I will go on my usual rant, that no one from the pro-gun side has ever answered. I live in an open carry state, my son, open carries at times when I am with him, I have no problem with that. However he had an in-law that felt the need to open carry to a 5 YO's family birthday party picnic at a private home, not in the inner city, something that seemed a bit inappropriate to me.
Maybe. Thats the thing with rights...people use them at inappropriate moments.
2nd question, outside of walking a field looking for game, or all out war, can someone please give me a reasonable cause to open carry long guns?
ETA: Guess I just brought reasonable into the conversation. Hats off to texan, guess that word is used.
So it isn't stolen from your truck,a nd because you can't stash it in your pocket? Not as often as it used to be, but it happens in smaller towns from time to time still.
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
Guess I will go on my usual rant, that no one from the pro-gun side has ever answered. I live in an open carry state, my son, open carries at times when I am with him, I have no problem with that. However he had an in-law that felt the need to open carry to a 5 YO's family birthday party picnic at a private home, not in the inner city, something that seemed a bit inappropriate to me.
2nd question, outside of walking a field looking for game, or all out war, can someone please give me a reasonable cause to open carry long guns?
ETA: Guess I just brought reasonable into the conversation. Hats off to texan, guess that word is used.
You can take a poop on the bathroom floor and it is legal but that doesn't mean you should do it. Usually the people carrying long guns (outside of a rural area) are those trying to make a point, not for any practical purpose.
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
originally posted by: BubbaJoe
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: buni11687
Favourable or unfavourable statistics aside, debates aside, one thing stands out among all other aspects regarding US citizens and their relationship with the US government vis-a-vis gun ownership and that is:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
Now, it is abundantly clear to this poster that the security of a free state is currently being compromised by the US government because the NSA spies, the FBI entraps, the CIA wars and the DHS / domestic law enforcement is upgrading to military grade enforcement - so your freedom is in jeapordy and politicians want to erode the constitution and amendments of inconvenience, so I'll say it again, just to drive it home....
Never before in the history of the United States of America has it been more vital that citizens are armed, because as sure as sh!t, your government wants to fully disarm you - one "restriction" and "mass shooting" at a time, one "comparison to Australia" at a time - FACT.
I'm glad this poll supports the NRA, even though in the big scheme of things, it's irrelevant to what the US governments real modus operandi is in regards to this topic.
Please point me to the website of a well regulated militia. I am not anti gun, am anti idiots owning them. There are too many accidental shootings, suicide by gun, and other gun related injuries in this country. There is a huge difference between a guy smacking his old lady around and emptying a clip in her.
Agreed, it's a culture and mental health issue thing
It's not guns - its culture etc
etc
etc
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: BubbaJoe
You do realize I'm from Australia yeah?
You do realize that no such website exists yeah?
Whats your point? other than your stance that idiots should not own guns?
My point is, very soon, it will be illegal to own guns in the US so your opinion will see the light of day...unless a well regulated militia is formed.
Propaganda, NSA spying and the DHS will ensure a well regulated militia is NEVER formed.
Am I clear now?
ETA: And those posts were me acknowledging that it's not guns - it's culture and mental health - that has nothing to do with my stance on the 2nd.
originally posted by: Edumakated
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
It's funny; the same people who will talk about reasonable gun laws are the first to claim it is unreasonable to ask for ID to vote. More liberal logic...
If it a reasonable that I need to pass a background check to purchase a firearm, then I think it is also reasonable that voters prove they can legally vote.