City On The Moon Found On Google Map, Oct 2015

I see a penthouse w/a rooftop infinity pool!

a reply to: Gideon70

The thread author is asking. Why is that an issue?

a reply to: Gideon70

OK get this . I found this on the internet . There is
NO other links or information . This is a conspiracy website .
If you don't like it , DO NOT post on my thread .
I did NOT state whether I believe this or not.
I posted it so that the ATS members could
comment on it .
Ignorance denied .

originally posted by: Dystopian7
a reply to: Gideon70

The thread author is asking. Why is that an issue?

Go back and read the opening post . The author says NASA is lying .
He is not asking . He is stating .
People like you are part of the problem.

originally posted by: radarloveguy
a reply to: Gideon70

OK get this . I found this on the internet . There is
NO other links or information . This is a conspiracy website .
If you don't like it , DO NOT post on my thread .
I did NOT state whether I believe this or not.
I posted it so that the ATS members could
comment on it .
Ignorance denied .

You stated NASA is lying.
You base this assumption on a photographic anomaly .
If all you want is people who agree with you , you are in for a rude awakening

The black cover makes it even more suspect, Google have been known to cover up certain google earth images, good find, flagged.

a reply to: Gideon70

I stated NO such thing .
That statement is a QUOTE
from the website I linked to .
Do some research ... look at the link !

Looking at the 2nd link you have put up I have to admit this is very exciting and unusual. Something has definitely been blacked out. You can see what they call a pyramid and to be honest it does have the look of one. The edges of some of the structures are not being covered and this is odd.

I know there will be the usual mocking etc but this is very interesting.

a reply to: Gideon70

Your missing the important point of this. It's not who is lying. It is that these look like real structures. Wow...I'm excited. This is best evidence I've seen.

originally posted by: radarloveguy
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

And the photo in the OP , the building with windows ?
...... #2

It is a pixelated picture, and has a boundary through it, colour bleed and likely too ambiguous for the digital process.

There's also a need to take in layering of pictures taken at different times.

originally posted by: radarloveguy
a reply to: Gideon70

I stated NO such thing .
That statement is a QUOTE
from the website I linked to .
Do some research ... look at the link !

You said , and I quote " It's all been a lie . This my friends is the real deal "

Anything else is just semantics on your part .... ok ?

originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: Gideon70

Your missing the important point of this. It's not who is lying. It is that these look like real structures. Wow...I'm excited. This is best evidence I've seen.

Best evidence of what ?????
Without a photo comparison of this showing a city , your arguement is silly.

originally posted by: Gideon70

originally posted by: radarloveguy
a reply to: Gideon70

You said , and I quote " It's all been a lie . This my friends is the real deal "
Anything else is just semantics on your part .... ok ?

One more time , I PASTED that quote from the link provided .

i have NOT offered ANY belief either way on this ,
no need to geteminaknot

a reply to: radarloveguy

So only post If you fall for this BS.

originally posted by: radarloveguy

originally posted by: Gideon70

originally posted by: radarloveguy
a reply to: Gideon70

You said , and I quote " It's all been a lie . This my friends is the real deal "
Anything else is just semantics on your part .... ok ?

One more time , I PASTED that quote from the link provided .

i have NOT offered ANY belief either way on this ,
no need to geteminaknot

I have , yet again....yawn, been back and read your initial post and there is nothing to indicate any quotes from an outside source.

If you haven't a clue how to present a thread , maybe you should lurk a little in future.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: radarloveguy

So only post If you fall for this BS.

NO , you DO NOT write the rules,
this is a valid thread , and I am looking
for the truth .
Please TRY and stay on topic .
We know you think it's all pixellation/artifacts.
I'm NOT so sure .

Real or not NASA definitely uses the clone tool quite a bit to cover up things and very poorly at that.

a reply to: Gideon70

There is clear attempted covering up of some kind of structures on the moon. These structures from the pictures have perfect corners and symtry that don't look natural.

I find this fishy all the way

look at the left side of the moon how pixelated its border is , you see zigzag there. ( by the way what is called that space fog behind the moon ? )

Is that a scotch tape ? why all the moonbases are following the tape line and zoom kaboom .. space stations !!! Tricks are all i see here

a reply to: radarloveguy

Neither do you but show me where in the T&C where it says that you can tell others not to post.

"If you don't like it , DO NOT post on my thread ." (not yours btw it is ATS's now.)

Like I said I don't like it because it is obvious what the images are.
So tell me again not to post.