Rubio: Women Are Getting Pregnant Just To Sell "Baby Parts" To Planned Parenthood

Hey Look! Another Republican who just doesn't like facts. Marc Rubio went full retard this week by spewing some BS that Planned Parenthood not only sells baby parts, but actually incentives women to have abortions.

“I just think you’ve created an industry now — a situation where very much, you’ve created an incentive for people not just to look forward to having more abortions, but being able to sell that fetal tissue — these centers — for purposes of making a profit off it, as you’ve seen in some of these Planned Parenthood affiliates.”

Why would women have abortions "for money" when they receive sweet F.A from anyone for it...?

Who does he think the "donations" go to? The women?


What a f#ing jabroni!!!

What in the world has happened to the Republican party? Back when I was a member they actually had intelligent candidates and look what they got now. Bobby Jindal was right the GOP has become the stupid party.

the government is not funding abortions for baby parts thats insanity

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

That's why this is prima facie absurd! The women don't get a PENNY for any donated tissue! What's their incentive, Marco? What are they getting out of having an abortion?

More ridiculous than Jeb! saying that Democrats get black voters by giving them "free stuff"...

Someone ring god, call in the asteroid strike.

Humanity is too far gone...

Hiw the f* did stupid multiply so exponentially, so quickly. ..

a reply to: Benevolent Heretic

Ludicrous isn't it, Benevolent.

These republican candidates are comedy gold for the intellectual...

I think even the great satirists would be jealous of all of this material...


It can't be real, can it?
Like deep down, & genuinely... From the heart bulls#?

I find it funny now, because I think they're quality trolls...

But if it's real, it's sad.

According to Republicans welfare is big business too, so I don't know why a woman would go through an abortion when she could make more money milking the system until that kid is 18

Silly man!! Women are getting paid to get pregnant and HAVE the babies, not abort them! A 5 second perusal of Craigslist will tell you this. SMH.

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Not only do women NOT get paid for having an abortion, they have to PAY for it! LOL! Lots of incentive right there!

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Not only do women NOT get paid for having an abortion, they have to PAY for it! LOL! Lots of incentive right there!

Must be some sort of investment we've never heard of.

a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

You know the sad part is that Rubio is seen as one of the "smarter" Republican candidates

Lol

Annnnnnnd that is why republicans are not going to get elected, the others are just a bad but not as ignorant..hell Ill go with outright stupid.

I think it's great that the Republicans continue to expose themselves for what they are. People, such as myself, have been talking for some time about how the Republican party has full retard.

The real sad thing is that they say these sorts of things because it's popular rhetoric among their voter base. We have a portion of the population, not just the political class, that believe and enjoy this sort of nonsense.

Scary to think about.

originally posted by: occrest
Silly man!! Women are getting paid to get pregnant and HAVE the babies, not abort them! A 5 second perusal of Craigslist will tell you this. SMH.

Yup! There's also egg donations. Which can net you between $5 - $10,000.

Rubio is probably just cherry picking issues. He can never answer a question with a simple answer. He's gotta cram a bunch of issues into it.

originally posted by: muse7
a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

You know the sad part is that Rubio is seen as one of the "smarter" Republican candidates

Lol

Hehe, yeah even I believed that until about 10 minutes ago...

a reply to: muse7

Makes me miss Ronald Reagan and George HW. Although I've heard that Ted Cruz is always the smartest man in the room. Have yet to see evidence of that, however.

What I am about to say with shock you all.
Rubio is wrong.

However, as a conservative libertarian
he should be right.
We should allow the mothers to get money for
their "donations" or at the very least if their
fetal tissue is sold
(I won't argue that point with any of you, it IS being done)
then the mother should not have to pay
the $800-$1500 that PP charges for
an abortion.
www.plannedparenthood.org...

As a conservative libertarian:
I say if someone wants to charge for
donor parts they should be allowed to
do so.

It is a crime that middle men
profit enormously in the "donation"
of organs at the death of living
humans.

It is a crime that PP should
profit from the "donation" of the
baby parts.

The people who should be allowed
to get the money from the "donations"
are the families.

The organs belong
to them, not the middle man who
makes millions selling them
(this includes adult organs).

That is what should be completely
illegal, profit for the middle man,
which should be non-profit but in
reality is definitely not.

As a libertarian, and true liberal conservative:

not a faux liberal/progressive (the liberals of today)
whose goal is to
control every aspect of everyone's life:

I say, you want to sell your organs,
fine, it's your body.

You want to sell your less than
viable fetus (under 24 weeks),
fine, it's your body,
after 24 weeks
it is no longer your body to sell.

You want to sell your inheritance
of a loved one's dead body, fine,
sell the organs to pay for the funeral
and final expenses.

Rubio is wrong that it is happening now.
But he should be right and all liberals
should be applauding the rightness of it.

I am NOT being sarcastic, I mean all of this.

Rubio is a Rube.Just when you think the repubs could'nt sink lower..Smh.

a reply to: grandmakdw

That's pretty progressive, grandma.

I do kind of agree though, some sort of compensation should be in order.
But there is that "slippery slope" of getting pregnant just for the money.

I wouldn't want to incentivise that, as much as I believe the donor should receive a sum of sorts.

Maybe enough to compensate, but not enough to incentivise is a good middle ground.