It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
UPS and FedEx are getting out of the unprofitable e-commerce shipping sector,
originally posted by: Montana
a
I'm sorry, but here I call nonsense. More than 25 years of railroad experience has made me an expert in railroad waste and excess. Please don't even try to blow that smoke. You would be fundamentally wrong.
originally posted by: AlaskanDad
Again another reason for the USPS it is public service that is needed, rather than a business which would cut services to increase their profits.
originally posted by: Semicollegiate
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
A good country-ide postal service is a social good - hence it is entirely appropriate for it to be taxpayer supported.
Private companies are happy to pick the eye-teeth out of profitable sections of it - but how many of them will deliver at affordable costs to all quarters of eth country?
Privatising post is just another right wing idiocy that ignores the need to have a functioning society with all the supporting services that required, in favour of allowing a few people to get filthy rich.
UPS and FedEx deliver everywhere.
Why wouldn't private mail?
originally posted by: Montana
Your margins might have been incredibly thin, but the quantities were wildly inflated due to waste and excess. This is the difference between looking in and looking out.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: MystikMushroom
Is the USPS more or less answerable to the people than the VA and the entire educational system?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Bluntone22
You aren't understanding. Congress passed a bill in 2006 that required the USPS to fund it's retirement, health and insurance for the next seventy years... within ten years time. No other federal, state or private entity is required to do that. It's absurd.
Well Congress passed a law. That makes it all better.
Some people had mortgages that required them to make house payments too. Guess what? That didn't work out so well.
If just having contracts and laws made everything work out perfectly, then there wouldn't be any problems. This is the same kind of magical thinking that makes some people think they can just mandate 100% of our energy come from renewable sourced within 10 years and it will somehow all magically happen, too.
Just because you wave your hand and decree it doesn't actually put any realistic solution in place.
It's like throwing gobs of cash at schools and saying, "There I fixed education." Even though there is no plan that goes with it. And everyone wonders why kids continue to not learn anything.
originally posted by: Kali74
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Bluntone22
You aren't understanding. Congress passed a bill in 2006 that required the USPS to fund it's retirement, health and insurance for the next seventy years... within ten years time. No other federal, state or private entity is required to do that. It's absurd.
Well Congress passed a law. That makes it all better.
Some people had mortgages that required them to make house payments too. Guess what? That didn't work out so well.
If just having contracts and laws made everything work out perfectly, then there wouldn't be any problems. This is the same kind of magical thinking that makes some people think they can just mandate 100% of our energy come from renewable sourced within 10 years and it will somehow all magically happen, too.
Just because you wave your hand and decree it doesn't actually put any realistic solution in place.
It's like throwing gobs of cash at schools and saying, "There I fixed education." Even though there is no plan that goes with it. And everyone wonders why kids continue to not learn anything.
What are you going on about? I don't think you understood anything I said... even a tiny bit.