It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: muse7
What are you going to do about it? You don't want to get the government involved, you're not a socialist are you?
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
It just goes to show you that even a 60 year old drug can still be profitable long after the initial investment, R&D and marketing have been recouped.
This is why I don't believe the myth that big pharma suppresses drugs for autism, cancer and AIDS. There are plenty of ways that big pharma can manipulate the supply and price of such drugs (as in this case) in order to keep reaping profits for decades upon decades.
It helps though -- believing that magical cures are somehow secreted away in labs under the guise of profit than the actual cold, hard reality: the are no magic bullets...yet.
Hell, even aspirin that is out of patent still is a cash cow for pharmaceutical companies.
originally posted by: gentledissident
originally posted by: muse7
What are you going to do about it? You don't want to get the government involved, you're not a socialist are you?
The government is already involved.
I am a socialist.
I really don't consider the governing bodies a true government. It's more like another corporation.
originally posted by: libertytoall
Your last statement probably sums up why you're a socialist. So you believe if the corporations are going to control the government then you might as well suck as much socialist policies out of them as possible.
originally posted by: gentledissident
originally posted by: libertytoall
Your last statement probably sums up why you're a socialist. So you believe if the corporations are going to control the government then you might as well suck as much socialist policies out of them as possible.
No, I'm a socialist because I believe housing, food, water, education, and medical should be available to all without a struggle. I'm a socialist because I believe in the honesty and efficiency of cooperation. We could be working far less hours with far less toil. Our technology could be amazing without the withholding of information that even occurs internally due to competition. Competition seems childish to me. It is best left to the field of entertainment.
I'm a capitalist when it comes to trinkets. If you want to make something nonessential, I might trade for it if it takes my mind off of death.
originally posted by: libertytoall
you believe housing, food, water, education, and medical should be available to all without struggle but who's going to pay for it all? Please tell me why all those things should be a god given right? Competition is a natural way. People striving for success is healthy.
originally posted by: libertytoall
you believe housing, food, water, education, and medical should be available to all without struggle but who's going to pay for it all? Please tell me why all those things should be a god given right? Competition is a natural way. People striving for success is healthy.