U.S. Marshals Raid Sheriff Joe’s Office

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
The previous Sheriff of Cochise County AZ (Larry Dever) was murdered;

No he was not, he was drunk and driving.

FLAGSTAFF, AZ - The blood-alcohol content of the Cochise County sheriff who died in a one-vehicle wreck in northern Arizona was more than three times the state's legal limit, an autopsy report shows.

www.abc15.com...

Here we go, an extemely drunk Sheriff is driving his vehicle on a mountain road; is not wearing his seat belt and drives into the abyss (goes against the simplest rules of DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE impared). He is/was the sheriff of Cochise County and is above the law? No one took this seriously here (we all know he was murdered).

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
The previous Sheriff of Cochise County AZ (Larry Dever) was murdered;

No he was not, he was drunk and driving.

FLAGSTAFF, AZ - The blood-alcohol content of the Cochise County sheriff who died in a one-vehicle wreck in northern Arizona was more than three times the state's legal limit, an autopsy report shows.

www.abc15.com...

Here we go, an extemely drunk Sheriff is driving his vehicle on a mountain road; is not wearing his seat belt and drives into the abyss (goes against the simplest rules of DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE impared). He is/was the sheriff of Cochise County and is above the law? No one took this seriously here (we all know he was murdered).

Can't argue with that. Doesn't make it fact you just can't argue with that which gives you Whitaker eye.

a reply to: intrepid

All this transferring is making me dizzy.

I did experience the FBI barging through my front door, grabbing my boyfriend and his friend who had just arrived, laying them out on the floor and handcuffing them.

My house was staked out, because I had dated a guy that went AWOL. This was 1964, I think.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
The previous Sheriff of Cochise County AZ (Larry Dever) was murdered;

No he was not, he was drunk and driving.

FLAGSTAFF, AZ - The blood-alcohol content of the Cochise County sheriff who died in a one-vehicle wreck in northern Arizona was more than three times the state's legal limit, an autopsy report shows.

www.abc15.com...

Here we go, an extemely drunk Sheriff is driving his vehicle on a mountain road; is not wearing his seat belt and drives into the abyss (goes against the simplest rules of DRIVING A MOTOR VEHICLE impared). He is/was the sheriff of Cochise County and is above the law? No one took this seriously here (we all know he was murdered).

Can't argue with that. Doesn't make it fact you just can't argue with that which gives you Whitaker eye.

I would with kindness call it this: Dever came in contact with an (up close and personal) experience with Murphy's law that ended his life ("A Bad Day At Black Rock").

a reply to: Annee

Damn! Its still happening?

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: hellobruce

No he was not, he was drunk and driving.

Ahh YES.

The P-E-R-F-E-C-T "accident"

Let me guess..... Obama's fault.

Oh well Maybe ... planned but not a "fault".

But more likely Janet was the orchestrator.

The illegal immigration policies were well under way by then.

Any and ALL threats had to be "eliminated".

All conspiracy theories Of Course.

Can't wait for those emails to get "discovered".

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

i know this is a CT site and what not....but really? I mean...Occams Razor....

Like convenient "accidents" and "coincidences" have never ever happened at the right places and times.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: xuenchen

Did you notice that the Sheriff ADMITTED to the charges?

I know you have to find a Democrat to cast aspersions on ... I just want to know that you read that, one of the ten or so times its been posted here.

Of COURSE he admitted something.

That's all part of the ongoing micromanaging plan and control.

With all the "Joe" corruption, you would think he would have been arrested by now.

But that would spoil a good blackmail plan wouldn't it?

btw, "Joe" is acting as controlled opposition with the birth certificate too.

It's brilliant. They get him to give wild accusations and therefore the conspiracy MUST be invalid.

It's brilliant. Orly Taitz is in the same scapegoat pen with her wild lawsuits that *always* miss the target as planned.

Only a few people know the real secret of Obama's "birth".

Ah, Alinsky Rule 3 again. Let's not deal in facts, or even reasonable suppositions based on facts, or even conjecture ... let's just make up whatever sounds scariest and go with that.

a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

i know this is a CT site and what not....but really? I mean...Occams Razor....

Like convenient "accidents" and "coincidences" have never ever happened at the right places and times.

Well.... looking at these threads one gets the impression that only Dems are committing these "accidents". Quite frankly it's not fooling anyone. Even this tripe topic. It's been shown that Joe has been a naughty boy for a while. HW did nothing. Bubba did nothing. W did nothing and now Obama is catching slack for his Admin(not him personally) doing something about this abuser of the Constitution? Pfft.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

OK.

I'll quit with the conspiracies.

I should have posted this topic in the Breaking News Forum.

Why do I hear voices elevating in squeak with every post?

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

Furry: How does one go back to the insanity and qualify/quantify it all over again without going through another rinse cycle?

originally posted by: intrepid

Well.... looking at these threads one gets the impression that only Dems are committing these "accidents".

Interesting idea.

Hmmm.

But it also looks like Repubs are getting the sharp end of the stick.

Jan Brewer knows.

The immigration policies are dangerous indeed.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

Furry: How does one go back to the insanity and qualify/quantify it all over again without going through another rinse cycle?

A question to a question. The epitome of a failed argument. Or would you like to answer his question?

a reply to: xuenchen
No, the divine interceptors would have placed this thread deemed correct forum. You need to have more trust in the system.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Annee

Damn! Its still happening?

That was 1964.

I doubt you could get away with that today.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

Furry: How does one go back to the insanity and qualify/quantify it all over again without going through another rinse cycle?

A question to a question. The epitome of a failed argument. Or would you like to answer his question?

Give Furry a chance to respond. Epitome of a failed argument that has'nt been addressed yet? When he answers I may question. Why not answer yourself intrepid.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Annee

Damn! Its still happening?

That was 1964.
I doubt you could get away with that today.

Oh but they do and have better recon.

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: vethumanbeing

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: xuenchen

if it were a difficult story to buy...maybe. evidence supporting your claim?

Furry: How does one go back to the insanity and qualify/quantify it all over again without going through another rinse cycle?

A question to a question. The epitome of a failed argument. Or would you like to answer his question?

Give Furry a chance to respond. Epitome of a failed argument that has'nt been addressed yet? When he answers I may question. Why not answer yourself intrepid.

You've got nothing. OK.