It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
i would rephrase that to " The aliens are a few years into the future when we get to the technological level to Prove them real "
originally posted by: Indigent
The aliens are a few years into the future when we get to the tecnology level to find them.
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
i would rephrase that to " The aliens are a few years into the future when we get to the technological level to Prove them real "
originally posted by: Indigent
The aliens are a few years into the future when we get to the tecnology level to find them.
Since Earth has the technology to "read" an exoplanet's atmosphere and "see" IF thee is any automobile exhaust in it...I'd say y'all have the technological ability to prove that ET is indeed real.
The fact that we have not yet found the slightest evidence for life — much less intelligence — beyond this Earth does not surprise or disappoint me in the least. Our technology must still be laughably primitive, we may be like jungle savages listening for the throbbing of tom-toms while the ether around them carries more words per second than they could utter in a lifetime.
- "Credo" (1991); also in Greetings, Carbon-Based Bipeds! : Collected Essays, 1934-1998 (1999), p. 360
originally posted by: taoistguy
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: All Seeing Eye
i would rephrase that to " The aliens are a few years into the future when we get to the technological level to Prove them real "
originally posted by: Indigent
The aliens are a few years into the future when we get to the tecnology level to find them.
Since Earth has the technology to "read" an exoplanet's atmosphere and "see" IF thee is any automobile exhaust in it...I'd say y'all have the technological ability to prove that ET is indeed real.
You are assuming aliens have cars like us using the same fuel as us.
originally posted by: Kojiro
Simply put, our technology is simply too primitive and stupid to detect them. Broad, energy wasteful radio signals are an absolutely terrible way to send long-distance calls through space. They breakdown and degrade the farther they go, ultimately becoming white noise within the CMB. In fact, we're starting to phase out radio, converting to more energy efficient digital signals, which means even if someone is able to tune in I Love Lucy on a distant planet, it'll only be for a very limited time (under 100 years, give or take a few decades).
So what would advanced aliens be using?
Directed lasers, come up as one possibility. A single tight, energy efficient beam would be able to get to its distant destination mostly intact, provided that the beam was accurately aimed. If it's angle is just slightly off, it could completely miss the intended recipient entirely and the recipient wouldn't be any wiser. There's also the possibility that the aliens figured out quantum entanglement and figured out how to send information through it (something far, far beyond our reach). I'm sure there are other advanced communications possibilities, any of them far more efficient than clunky energy inefficient radio.
That said, we are starting to develop the technologies that allow us to peer into other star systems, and so I have great expectations for Optical SETI.
originally posted by: Xeven
Of all the millions of Species Earth has produced, only one has evolved enough to ask that question in 4 billion years...
Other Earth like planets might never see a species evolve the way Humans have. Even today there is no other species here that we can communicate with. How do you expect there to be life nearby that we could communicate with?
That right there is the Answer to this question. Mark this thread solved.
originally posted by: moebius
What is your favorite and why?
originally posted by: Kojiro
a reply to: tanka418
You're funnier.
Radio uses radio waves, a laser uses light. Different technologies. Different bands of electromagnetic radiation. You might as well suggest that deadly gamma rays are the same thing as radio, even though radio can't burn you to a mote in an instant like a gamma ray can.
Furthermore, at no point did I say aliens have never possessed radio, they are simply unlikely to use it for long in their development, much like ourselves.
originally posted by: tanka418
originally posted by: Kojiro
a reply to: tanka418
You're funnier.
Radio uses radio waves, a laser uses light. Different technologies. Different bands of electromagnetic radiation. You might as well suggest that deadly gamma rays are the same thing as radio, even though radio can't burn you to a mote in an instant like a gamma ray can.
lol...okay, gamma rays are the same as radio. In as much as they are both electromagnetic radiation...it would seem that they follow the same physics. Further, gamma rays, are simply very high energy "radio"...which, contrary to your belief, will burn you to an instant crisp at sufficiently high energy levels.
Furthermore, at no point did I say aliens have never possessed radio, they are simply unlikely to use it for long in their development, much like ourselves.
No you didn't, you were attempting to go on about how ET would use light and lasers. When, in fact, the use of light, lasers, is actually a step backwards when it comes to communication. Back in the early years of the last century there were attempts to use light for communication...it did seem a natural thing to do. But when it came to needing the "light" to change direction, to "bend" around a blocking object; it was found that light couldn't work. That's one of the problems with light...you can block it with a thin piece of paper. In the atmosphere of all planets, even in space there "dust clouds" that will prevent lasers from working by blocking the complete transmission of any light; making the lower frequency "radio" superior in all respects. Even the power loss / dissipation (propagation) of radio and lasers is the same,
originally posted by: Kojiro
No, gamma rays are high energy electromagnetic radiation. Electromagnetic radiation isn't radio, radio is is low spectral band electromagnetic radiation. You know, like that old saying we teach small children: "All thumbs are fingers, but not all fingers are thumbs."
And I'm pretty sure I stated that gamma rays could kill you in an instant, so I don't grasp where you think I said otherwise.
Hm... and I suppose you have another self-drawn graph showing these results, because it seems rather peculiar that if such a problem with lasers existed, that they would go ahead and use and search for the technology with Optical SETI.
www.seti.org...
originally posted by: mbkennel
a reply to: taoistguy
The usefulness of liquid hydrocarbon fuel is based on universal chemistry.
If you had to pick out a design for safe portable energy and given the periodic table & chemistry textbook, you'd come up with kerosene.