It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
I think the brain dead idiots are the people wondering what else is the cop suppose to do. wow
Well please explain to this idiot what he was supposed to do then. Just let him go because he didn't feel like getting arrested? Try again when he's feeling more cooperative?
originally posted by: fixitwcw
a reply to: alienjuggalo
lol. i agree, but your gonna get flamed. i'm starting to lean toward only violent/corruption/theft/sex crimes being against the law.
He had an opportunity to avoid being arrested when the cop told him to get out of the street, but he decided not to take that opportunity.
Then he had a chance to avoid being tazed when the cop with the taser pointed at him told him to stop
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Greathouse
Getting violent over someone disrespecting the flag is more disrespectful to what it represents than burning.
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Greathouse
Getting violent over someone disrespecting the flag is more disrespectful to what it represents than burning.
If I see someone disrespecting the flag. Things would not go very well for either of us .
That wouldn't be the very amendment you exercised when you made that remark would it? Or do you just not like the First Amendment when someone protest's something you don't agree with ?
Freedom of speech, protest and assembly is a tricky thing for some neophytes. They don't realize it applies to both sides not just the side they believe in.
All I have done is tell you what I would do . I recommend that course of action for no one because it will have consequences . But I am willing to except those consequences . I couldn't possibly expect most of you people to understand . Because many of you stand for nothing, you do all your protesting and complaints under the veil of anonymity on the Internet .
According to Missouri state law, impeding the flow of traffic is punishable by “a fine of not less than ten dollars nor more than fifty dollars.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Greathouse
All I have done is tell you what I would do . I recommend that course of action for no one because it will have consequences . But I am willing to except those consequences . I couldn't possibly expect most of you people to understand . Because many of you stand for nothing, you do all your protesting and complaints under the veil of anonymity on the Internet .
Quit while you're behind? It's a practical impossibility to prove that you're not just another Internet tough guy by talking smack on the Internet, tough guy.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: Sremmos80
This is really getting boring. Everyone's going to take the idealistic stand that violence is bad. When every damn one of you have committed violent acts.
Then as usual you come along as usual and try to put words in my mouth.
originally posted by: Greathouse
With your stance I would certainly hate to be. Either one of your friends or family, I'd hate to be in a situation where I needed help if you were around, and I would hate to be a child being victimized. Because according to your statement you would just stand there and scold the perpetrators .