It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While the Ontario Liberal government under lesbian Premier Kathleen Wynne would have parents believe its newly unveiled sex-ed program is an unbiased presentation of fact, a detailed look at what kids in grades 1-8 are expected to learn reveals something entirely different.
Passing the baton of the 1960s sexual revolt to today’s up-and-coming generations of youngsters, the 2015 Health and Physical Education program states in its earliest pages that sexual health “is more than simply teaching young people about the anatomy and physiology of reproduction,” but includes the relatively recent inventions of “sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression” as well as “gender roles and expectations.”
originally posted by: caladonea
I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
a reply to: Telos
What does the sexuality of the Premier have to do with it?
I don't see anything wrong with teaching the kids the facts. In fact, more education is what is needed to combat teenage pregnancy and the spread of STDs.
I can see how this would bother someone who wishes to continue their own judgements and hateful treatment of LGBT people.
originally posted by: caladonea
a reply to: Telos
I feel those sexual (supposed education) programs should not be in schools at all. I feel that parents should tell their children about those things in life...when the children are ready. Every child is different...and their timing and curiosity about such things is different too. Not every child is ready to hear and learn about such things at such young ages.
I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.
I am very frightened for and worried about the children of today.
originally posted by: Telos
Well if for some people teaching the kids at 6 years of age about all that is mentioned in the OP is normal, then I can say this world is more sick then I thought.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: Telos
Not for anything I mentioned the fact that the architect of all this was someone arrested for pedophilia.
Do you have a link for that, because he wasn't mentioned in the article...
originally posted by: caladonea
a reply to: Telos
I get this awful feeling that there may be a (hidden pedofile agenda) for teaching such things to children at such a young age.
I am very frightened for and worried about the children of today.
TORONTO, March 13, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) -- A homosexual activist has candidly admitted that gay-themed materials and policies pushed in grade schools across North America are for the sake of “indoctrinating” children into an unquestioning acceptance of homosexuality.
“I am here to tell you: All that time I said I wasn't indoctrinating anyone with my beliefs about gay and lesbian and bi and trans and queer people? That was a lie,” writes long-time Canadian gay activist S. Bear Bergman in a piece appearing on Huffington Post a week ago tellingly titled ‘I Have Come to Indoctrinate Your Children Into My LGBTQ Agenda (And I'm Not a Bit Sorry).’
Bergman, who runs a Toronto-based publishing company making books for children that positively portrays “LGBTQ” people, is the transgender partner of J. Wallace, a gender equity adviser at the Toronto District School Board (TDSB).
As a young queer activist, full of teenage certainty (and angst, and hormones), I used to bristle and complain at a lot of the things said about those of us who were doing the work of LGBTQ equity and inclusion. By far, with a bullet, my number one upset was with the people who accused us of recruiting. "You can't reproduce, you have to recruit!" shrieked one memorable fellow.
The first time I was introduced to this idea of reproduction and recruitment as the two paths to Being All The Homosexual I Could Be, I had two very strong reactions. I felt the revulsion of denial, of course -- we were not recruiting, and certainly not in the way that this asshole was suggesting we were. At the same time, I experienced a delicious fantasy in which I was in fact recruited and chosen to be queer. In it, I was ushered into the world of queerness with care and tenderness by experienced homos and trans people (in my imagination they were like very fabulous versions of my favorite camp counselors from childhood). I would be issued my leather jacket and my protest pins, my safer sex supplies and a hotline of some kind I could call if I needed it. As a teenaged homo trying to piece together strained relationships with my family or origin, it was a really nice idea.
I progressed to giving talks at high schools about LGBTQ acceptance and tolerance (those were the watchwords of the day) and again, the mail flowed -- how dare I indoctrinate impressionable young minds into the idea that queers and transfolk were just as fine and lovely a kind of human as any other kind.
My wickedness, you see. It knows no bounds.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: Telos
Not for anything I mentioned the fact that the architect of all this was someone arrested for pedophilia.
Do you have a link for that, because he wasn't mentioned in the article...
www.torontosun.com...
TORONTO - By day, Ben Levin was the esteemed educator, tenured U of T professor, former Ontario deputy education minister, the expert who had the ear of premiers and leaders the world over. And in his off hours? He liked to frequent an online incest chat room to counsel single moms on how to sexually assault their daughters for his pleasure and theirs, a site where his profile listed his sexuality as “nothing is taboo.” How frightening to think this was the man who had so much influence on education in this province and beyond. A look at his Facebook page shows that he was speaking at conferences and workshops around the globe before his July 2013 arrest. And all the while, he was going back to his hotel room and logging on to the “M” website — its real name concealed due to ongoing investigations — where he shared, created and discussed the sexual abuse of the very children he sought to educate.
On Aug. 12, 2012, Toronto Police Det.-Const. Janelle Blackadar went on the site posing as a sexually submissive single mother interested in the sexualization of her children. Levin encouraged her to sexually touch her two daughters and told her he had done the same to his own three girls when they were as young as 12. The court heard, though, that it was all talk — there’s no evidence Levin sexually abused his daughters and faces no such charges.
In December, 2012, he was also online with Angela Johnson, a London, Ont. investigator posing as a single mom of three kids. Levin also told her he had been sexually active with his own daughters. “Miss that a lot,” he said online, “but we had many wonderful years.”
www.torontosun.com...
Levin — a former deputy education minister who is expected to plead guilty to child porn-related charges Tuesday — repeatedly highlighted his role as overseeing curriculum issues. In a 2009 newsletter, the then-deputy minister said he was “responsible for ... everything that they do” and to “implement” the “new” approach.
This was the beginning of the 63-year-old’s involvement in the controversial curriculum change. Once a professor at the University of Toronto’s Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, there are many interpretations about Levin’s part in the curriculum, but it’s his own definition that should clear it up. On March 6, 2009, Levin wrote and signed a memo that put himself in charge of Ontario’s school curriculum. “Dear colleagues, I am writing to provide an update on our sector’s agenda ...
I will be filling the ADM (assistant deputy minster) position previously held by George Zegarac ...