It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Maybe I have been unclear; I think Darwin was right about most of his observations and conclusions. I question some of the assumptions made by him and his successors. From my view random mutation and natural selection go a long way toward accounting for the diversity of life on Earth, but there has to be more to it.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
a reply to: borntowatch
So a complex or essential function for the whales vestigial limbs has been shown to exist?
Can you produce a verified source for this?
Maybe one that isn't a creationist/ID/anti-evolution page?
Why are so many people turning this thread in to a creation evolution, religion argument.
originally posted by: borntowatch
You are comparing written words and colors to evolution and think your argument is logical.
Stop and think, just a little, only a tiny bit before posting another reply.
originally posted by: DarkATi
originally posted by: borntowatch
You are comparing written words and colors to evolution and think your argument is logical.
Stop and think, just a little, only a tiny bit before posting another reply.
Since you didn't come right out and say why you think my example is illogical, I can only assume.
I will assume that you think I'm an idiot because I am using words, written and then colored by an intelligent being, in order to demonstrate the theory of evolution, a natural process without the support of an intelligent being.
If this is the case, you are quite mixed up. I did not post that picture as an example of biological evolution. Rather, I was using the picture to demonstrate what gradual change (i.e. evolution) looks like in general.
Again, there is no problem here. In order to talk about and understand natural processes, humans have to use intelligence. This does not mean that the processes being intelligently discussed are therefore intelligent processes (or have intelligence behind them).
Next time, please be direct and explain your reply. Otherwise, you're wasting everyone's time. If I'm being an idiot, all you need to do is show me how I'm being an idiot; I will then accept it and we can both move on.
You want an education or a debate? Educate yourself. That is how science works.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: borntowatch
Looking for scientific evidence of speciation ?
Here you go.
Hope you have a good pair of reading glasses and a bottomless cup of coffee on hand...
Sorry cranial sponge, I want a discussion not a link to a vague substanceless website.
Please copy and paste your points and then link the site.
Its a discussion not a link fest
I do hope you are not offended and understand?
originally posted by: OpenMindedRealist
a reply to: Krazysh0t
From my view random mutation and natural selection go a long way toward accounting for the diversity of life on Earth, but there has to be more to it.
originally posted by: roth1
You want an education or a debate? Educate yourself. That is how science works.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: borntowatch
Looking for scientific evidence of speciation ?
Here you go.
Hope you have a good pair of reading glasses and a bottomless cup of coffee on hand...
Sorry cranial sponge, I want a discussion not a link to a vague substanceless website.
Please copy and paste your points and then link the site.
Its a discussion not a link fest
I do hope you are not offended and understand?
originally posted by: kayej1188
Here is the entire issue with the OP in a nutshell. I'm going to break it down. This was your quote from a couple posts back:
"Nahhh, I just made it up for a bit of fun, see I am so clever I can make up great sounding theory that is persuasive and scientificy I am not selling anything or trying to persuade people to accept my beliefs. if you want science to explain the truth you can do your own research. I am not here to win a war or argue."
Notice what's in bold. It's the most telling part of this thread--it screams that you are an absolute joke. There is SO much research and evidence out there supporting evolution. It is not our job to convince you. Please, take your own advice and "if you want science to explain the truth you can do your own research." If you actually do your due diligence, and still not convinced, then that's that. There's nothing more to say. You have a difference of opinion, and it is not our job to convince you, nor do any of us care what you believe. Just know that your at odds with just about 99.9% of all scientists. Instead of going on about what that means about us, maybe you should focus more on what that means about you.
I highly highly recommend that this thread be neglected. I also suggest that any moderators reading take a careful look at Borntowatch's post history and ineffective/unproductive style and STRONGLY consider banning him or removing his privileges. He is a very poor representation of what ATS is all about.
originally posted by: borntowatch
No I wont answer it because I dont have to prove myself to you.
No I'm not going to tell you what my theory is, its not scientific so its not a theory. I am after a scientific evidence to prove the theory that I think is a crock of crap
Evolution maybe all be but fact, but the lack of evidence proves its a fairy tail.
You spout off like a hot kettle but offer no evidence, seen that done around here lots.
Thanks but no thanks.
and finally if I am the infant then isnt the onus on you to prove what you believe is true, glad I am not your child. Dictator much?
originally posted by: borntowatch
I am interested in seeing life changing from one species to another.
originally posted by: Prezbo369
originally posted by: borntowatch
No I wont answer it because I dont have to prove myself to you.
No I'm not going to tell you what my theory is, its not scientific so its not a theory. I am after a scientific evidence to prove the theory that I think is a crock of crap
Evolution maybe all be but fact, but the lack of evidence proves its a fairy tail.
You spout off like a hot kettle but offer no evidence, seen that done around here lots.
Thanks but no thanks.
and finally if I am the infant then isnt the onus on you to prove what you believe is true, glad I am not your child. Dictator much?
Do you see how your standards of evidence are so poor that your opinion of evolution is pretty much worthless?