It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Edwin Gray likes smoking cigarettes, but a Superior Court judge in Washington D.C. has ruled Gray can’t smoke anything in his home - including marijuana, which was recently legalized in the District.
Gray’s neighbors filed a civil lawsuit against Gray and his sister, Mozella Johnson, who lives in the family home. The neighbors, a couple with one child and another on the way, alleged in their lawsuit that they’re being harmed by Gray’s smoke - which permeates their home through a hole in the basement.
"We were floored," Johnson told WJLA. Their family has owned the home for 50 years.
The judge filed a temporary injunction and ordered that no one in the house, including guests, smoke indoors.
Washington D.C. real estate attorney and Washington Post columnist Benny Kass was surprised at the outcome. "I think it’s an excellent precedent to start, so people can realize you can't just ignore your neighbor," Kass said. "Your home is no longer your castle."
The lawsuit asks for $500,000 in damages, and the case is ongoing, but Johnson believes the injunction sets a bad precedent. "If this judge has done this, who will be next? What other neighbor will be next?" he asked.
originally posted by: Anyafaj
Edwin Gray likes smoking cigarettes, but a Superior Court judge in Washington D.C. has ruled Gray can’t smoke anything in his home - including marijuana, which was recently legalized in the District.
Gray’s neighbors filed a civil lawsuit against Gray and his sister, Mozella Johnson, who lives in the family home. The neighbors, a couple with one child and another on the way, alleged in their lawsuit that they’re being harmed by Gray’s smoke - which permeates their home through a hole in the basement.
"We were floored," Johnson told WJLA. Their family has owned the home for 50 years.
The judge filed a temporary injunction and ordered that no one in the house, including guests, smoke indoors.
Washington D.C. real estate attorney and Washington Post columnist Benny Kass was surprised at the outcome. "I think it’s an excellent precedent to start, so people can realize you can't just ignore your neighbor," Kass said. "Your home is no longer your castle."
The lawsuit asks for $500,000 in damages, and the case is ongoing, but Johnson believes the injunction sets a bad precedent. "If this judge has done this, who will be next? What other neighbor will be next?" he asked.
How long before smoking is illegal entirely? I don't smoke right now, but I have in the past. This man was in his own home! I doubt very highly he smoked so much that these people were that inconvenienced. Sure, maybe they smelled a cigarette or two, now and then, but I highly doubt it was so excessive that they need an injunction to stop him AND $500,000! Give me a break!
originally posted by: StoutBroux
Oh this is too easy. They should sit out in their front yard and smoke! Then go in the back yard and smoke. Sit on the roof and smoke. Sit in their car with the windows down and smoke.
They'll probably have to smoke proof their house. $500,000 in damages???? For what? An offensive odor? This better get resolved fast.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
Oh this is too easy. They should sit out in their front yard and smoke! Then go in the back yard and smoke. Sit on the roof and smoke. Sit in their car with the windows down and smoke.
They'll probably have to smoke proof their house. $500,000 in damages???? For what? An offensive odor? This better get resolved fast.
originally posted by: thesaneone
I can't tell from the article but are these neighbors next door in a different building or are they neighbors in a apartment upstairs?
If next door in their own house then screw them nobody is going to tell me what I can do in my own home but if it's in a shared building then I would say move if you don't like it it's still his home.
Washington D.C. real estate attorney and Washington Post columnist Benny Kass was surprised at the outcome. "I think it’s an excellent precedent to start, so people can realize you can't just ignore your neighbor," Kass said. "Your home is no longer your castle."
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
Washington D.C. real estate attorney and Washington Post columnist Benny Kass was surprised at the outcome. "I think it’s an excellent precedent to start, so people can realize you can't just ignore your neighbor," Kass said. "Your home is no longer your castle."
And therein lies the issue. The bolded part speaks VOLUMES on where our country is and has been headed for quite a while.
You don't own anything. You are not your own person capable of making decisions on your own. You need the nanny state to make it all better and to keep you safe.
People accepted it and asked for it for too long. Welcome to the fruits of their labor.
which permeates their home through a hole in the basement.
originally posted by: Connman
I personally would want this hole in the basement looked into for starters. .
But for sure I would be cooking the nastiest smelling stuff I could think of and burn some of those nasty smelling incense by the pack.
And as for the bad call by the judge I can't comment on unbiased. I don't like judges
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Kangaruex4Ewe
With that same logic, doesn't the other family have a righit to not have smoke in thier castle if they don't want it?
The fine is ridiculous and outrageous but I kinda get the claim. It is a shared building with kids that are possibly getting exposed to smoke.
Does the phrase " your rights end where mine begin" not apply here?